News & Analysis as of

Preliminary Injunctions › Mandatory Arbitration Clauses › Employment Litigation

Seward & Kissel LLP

Employment Litigation Roundup: December 2024

Seward & Kissel LLP on

Arizona employer cannot exclude settlement communications from former employee’s retaliation complaint - In Flores v. Rafi Law Group PLLC, the plaintiff accused her law firm employer of retaliating against her by (i)...more

Ogletree, Deakins, Nash, Smoak & Stewart,...

Ninth Circuit Panel to Reconsider Decision Upholding California Mandatory Arbitration Ban

Ogletree, Deakins, Nash, Smoak & Stewart,... on

​​​​​​​The panel of the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals that largely upheld California’s law banning mandatory arbitration agreements in the employment context just withdrew its decision. On August 22, 2022, two of the three...more

Fisher Phillips

The Arbitration Whipsaw Continues – Court Reinstates Portions of California Prohibition of Mandatory Arbitration Agreements

Fisher Phillips on

- The Ninth Circuit rules that portions of Assembly Bill 51 are not preempted by the Federal Arbitration Act (“FAA”) and lifts a lower court’s injunction that barred the law from taking effect. - The court did rule that...more

Littler

National and State Trade Groups Sue to Strike Down California “Anti-Arbitration” Law

Littler on

On Friday, December 6, 2019, a coalition of national and state trade associations filed suit in California federal court seeking to strike down the state’s recently enacted “anti-arbitration” law, A.B. 51.1  A.B. 5...more

4 Results
 / 
View per page
Page: of 1

"My best business intelligence, in one easy email…"

Your first step to building a free, personalized, morning email brief covering pertinent authors and topics on JD Supra:
Sign up Log in
*By using the service, you signify your acceptance of JD Supra's Privacy Policy.
- hide
- hide