News & Analysis as of

Reservation of Rights Duty to Defend

Lowenstein Sandler LLP

Allocation: Debunking the “Partial” Duty to Defend Myth

In this episode of "Don’t Take No for an Answer," Lynda A. Bennett and Alexander B. Corson explore the complex issue of "allocation" in the context of defense costs in insurance claims. They discuss what steps to take when...more

Bradley Arant Boult Cummings LLP

Insurance in the Know (Part 1): Reservations of Rights Can Trigger Right to Independent Counsel

This is the first in a series of discussions about issues that arise on a regular basis after policyholders file an insurance claim. Many liability insurance policies require the insurer to defend the insured. This “duty...more

Wiley Rein LLP

Insurer With Excess “Other Insurance” Clause Owes No Defense Obligations

Wiley Rein LLP on

The United States District Court for the Southern District of New York, applying New York law, has held that an E&O insurer had no obligation to contribute toward the defense of an underlying matter in light of its policy’s...more

Ervin Cohen & Jessup LLP

Getting Your Insurer To Favorably Resolve Litigation

Ervin Cohen & Jessup LLP on

Where a liability carrier has assumed its insured’s defense under a reservation of rights, a variety of conflicts between those parties may arise when there are settlement discussions to resolve the underlying litigation....more

Rivkin Radler LLP

New York Insurance Coverage Law Update - July 2022

Rivkin Radler LLP on

Second Circuit Holds That Insurer Precluded From Relying On Exclusions Because Unreasonably Delayed Disclaiming While Basis Was, Or Should Have Been, Apparent- In December 2015, Luis Alberto was working on a construction...more

White and Williams LLP

Federal Courts Reject Insurers’ Attempts to Recoup Defense Costs Expended Under Reservation of Rights

In situations where there is a dispute over a duty to defend, an insurer may provide a defense to its insured, subject to a reservation of rights, to not only deny coverage for a defense, but also to file a declaratory...more

Rivkin Radler LLP

Insurance Update - March 2022

Rivkin Radler LLP on

Texas practitioners can add a new term to their legal vocabulary: “the Monroe exception.” The Texas Supreme Court has finally weighed in on whether to create an exception to the eight corners rule when determining if an...more

Wiley Rein LLP

Insurer Owes Duty to Defend and Indemnify Nuisance Litigation

Wiley Rein LLP on

A federal district court, applying California law, has held that an insurer owed a duty to defend and indemnify an insured in an underlying nuisance litigation under a not-for-profit D&O policy, as the policy’s pollution,...more

Rivkin Radler LLP

Justices May Hesitate to Review Calif. Fraud Coverage Case

Rivkin Radler LLP on

Many states have statutes or public policy that prohibits insurers from indemnifying policyholders for claims caused by their own willful acts. This is typical in the context of criminal acts or punitive damages, which many...more

Wiley Rein LLP

Insured Barred From Settling Without Insurer’s Consent Absent Breach of Duty to Defend But Insurer Must Exercise Good Faith in...

Wiley Rein LLP on

The United States District Court for the District of South Dakota, applying South Dakota law, has held that an insured healthcare system was barred from settling without its healthcare liability insurer’s consent where the...more

Polsinelli

Tanning Tiff: Illinois Supreme Court Clarifies Duty to Defend BIPA Claims

Polsinelli on

In a highly anticipated case before Illinois' highest court, the justices recently found an insurance carrier’s business liability policy requires it to defend a lawsuit alleging violations of the Illinois Biometric...more

Rivkin Radler LLP

New York Insurance Coverage Law Update - March 2021

Rivkin Radler LLP on

The insured was sued in an underlying action seeking damages and injunctive relief for alleged trademark infringement. The insured tendered the action to its CGL insurer which disclaimed. The insured settled the underlying...more

Payne & Fears

Nevada Supreme Court Recognizes an Insurer's Reimbursement Claim

Payne & Fears on

The Nevada Supreme Court held that insurers may seek reimbursement of defense costs if a court determines that it owed no duty to defend and the insurer reserved reimbursement rights. In Nautilus Insurance Company v....more

Rivkin Radler LLP

Insurance Update - March 2021

Rivkin Radler LLP on

In our March Insurance Update, we discuss four state supreme court cases and four cybercrime cases. The state high courts address: •From whose perspective should a consent-to-settle provision be judged? •What standard...more

Cozen O'Connor

Extrinsic Evidence and the Duty to Defend in Texas: To Be or Not to Be?

Cozen O'Connor on

In July of 2020, the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit revisited and affirmed its prediction that Texas courts will not allow extrinsic evidence to determine an insurer’s duty to defend where such evidence...more

Cozen O'Connor

NY Appellate Court: Liability Insurer Cannot Recover Defense Costs Absent Express Policy Provision

Cozen O'Connor on

Given the breadth of the duty to defend, liability insurers often must defend insureds against claims that do not ultimately trigger the duty to indemnify. In some states, an insurer can offer a defense under a reservation of...more

Gould + Ratner LLP

Suburb's Citizens Out of Luck Against Contractor's Insurer for Contaminated Water

Gould + Ratner LLP on

Under established Illinois law, an insurer must defend a legal action filed against its insured unless it is clear from the face of the underlying complaint that the allegations fail to state facts which bring the case...more

White and Williams LLP

Connecticut Supreme Court Finds Duty to Defend When Case Law is Uncertain

White and Williams LLP on

The Connecticut Supreme Court recently addressed whether an insurer has a duty to defend when faced with legal uncertainty as to whether coverage is owed: for example, when there is no Connecticut case law on point, and...more

Saul Ewing LLP

Illinois Appellate Court Provides Guidance on Insurers’ Duty to Defend Biometric Information Lawsuit

Saul Ewing LLP on

On March 20, 2020, the Illinois Appellate Court for the First District issued its decision in the case of West Bend Mutual Insurance Company v. Krishna Schaumburg Tan, Inc., 2020 IL App (1st) 191834, 2020 WL 191834, a...more

Hinshaw & Culbertson - Insights for Insurers

Appellate Court Rules Insurers Have Duty to Defend Illinois Biometric Privacy Claim

An Illinois state appellate court recently ruled that a customer's biometric privacy class action claims against an insured tanning salon potentially fell within two insurer's personal injury coverage. See, West Bend Mutual...more

Pillsbury - Policyholder Pulse blog

Are Denials of Coverage and Belated Defense Payments a Breach of the Duty to Defend? In Wisconsin—Not Necessarily.

When an insurer pursues a judicial determination on its duty to defend and agrees to defend its insured retroactively only five months after its insured initially requested a defense, has it breached its duty to defend? In...more

Sheppard Mullin Richter & Hampton LLP

Anti-Slapp Statute Does Not Apply To Allegations That Insurer Improperly Refused To Provide Cumis Counsel

Miller Marital Deduction Trust v. Zurich American Insurance Company, — P.3d –, 2019 WL 5304862; First Appellate District Court of Appeal, Division Three, Case No. A155398 (October 21, 2019). In Miller Marital Deduction...more

Rumberger | Kirk

Four Things Insurance Companies Should Know About Florida House Bill 301

Rumberger | Kirk on

Florida House Bill 301—approved by the Florida Legislature in the 2019 Regular Session and signed by the Governor—addressed a number of different issues relating to insurance in Florida. This article discusses four of those...more

Pillsbury - Policyholder Pulse blog

11th Circuit Finds Duty to Indemnify Is Not Ripe until Underlying Action Is Resolved

It’s a familiar story to anyone involved in insurance claims. A policyholder is sued and tenders the claim to its insurer. The insurer agrees to defend subject to a reservation of rights, but it also asserts that policy...more

Farella Braun + Martel LLP

Claims-Made Policy Note: Policy’s Use of Defined Terms May Expand or Limit Coverage Under Related Acts Provision

In an unpublished decision, the Ninth Circuit affirmed the Central District of California’s interpretation of the related acts provision in a professional liability policy, holding that related acts reported in a prior policy...more

57 Results
 / 
View per page
Page: of 3

"My best business intelligence, in one easy email…"

Your first step to building a free, personalized, morning email brief covering pertinent authors and topics on JD Supra:
*By using the service, you signify your acceptance of JD Supra's Privacy Policy.
- hide
- hide