News & Analysis as of

Restraint of Trade Former Employee

CDF Labor Law LLP

California Assists New York Employees in No-Poach Case

CDF Labor Law LLP on

A private class-action complaint claimed that the department store, Saks, and several luxury brands (including Louis Vuitton, Loro Piana, Prada, Brunello and Fendi) violated Federal Antitrust laws when they agreed that each...more

Seyfarth Shaw LLP

Will we win? The odds of success in restraint of trade cases

Seyfarth Shaw LLP on

When an ex-employee goes to a competitor or starts poaching clients or staff, employers often look to a restraint of trade clause to protect key business assets such as client relationships or company confidential...more

Seyfarth Shaw LLP

Cyber Restraints Of Trade In The New Era Of Digital Markets

Seyfarth Shaw LLP on

An enforceable restraint of trade can be a key business asset, giving an employer time to recover when a senior employee has left the business for a competitor. Like a good insurance policy, it’s a big relief to have it when...more

Adler Pollock & Sheehan P.C.

Noncompetes with Massachusetts Employees: Subsidizing a Former Employee’s “Garden Leave”

Effective October 1, 2018, employers in Massachusetts, Rhode Island, and other states seeking to hold Massachusetts employees to noncompete agreements must meet the requirements of a new law passed by the Massachusetts...more

Littler

Second California Court Adopts Position that Employee Non-Solicitation Clauses are Invalid Restraints on Trade

Littler on

On January 11, 2019, a California federal district court issued a decision bolstering the argument that employee non-solicitation clauses are unenforceable under California law....more

Knobbe Martens

Enforcing a Non-Compete Agreement? – One Size Does Not Fit All

Knobbe Martens on

Two high-end, off-price fashion brands are duking it out over an employee jumping ship from Century 21 Department Stores, LLC to Rue Gilt Groupe. On November 5, 2018, Century 21 sued Rue Gilt Groupe and Berenice Arcuri in...more

Seyfarth Shaw LLP

The Post-Employment Restraint As A Business Asset

Seyfarth Shaw LLP on

This is the case now more than ever given that the Supreme Court of Victoria’s decision in Just Group Limited v Peck [2016] VSC 614 (later affirmed on appeal) has arguably raised the bar for correctly drafting an effective...more

Allen Matkins

Nevada Supreme Court Addresses Nationwide Non-Compete

Allen Matkins on

Given California's hostility to non-compete agreements, it is easy to lose sight of the fact that other states don't have the same attitude. In neighboring Nevada, the courts will look to whether the restraint on competition...more

Seyfarth Shaw LLP

Prescribing the “minimum effective dose”

Seyfarth Shaw LLP on

Drafting and enforcing post-employment restraints has a lot in common with good medicine. It is necessary to prescribe only the “minimum effective dose” – the amount necessary to produce the desired outcome with minimum...more

Ogletree, Deakins, Nash, Smoak & Stewart,...

Poachers Beware: Wisconsin Court Rules That Restrictions on Employee Solicitation Are Subject to Law Governing Noncompetes

In a case of first impression, the Wisconsin Court of Appeals held that anti-poaching provisions in post-employment restrictive covenants are subject to the statutory regulations that govern noncompete agreements in...more

Foley & Lardner LLP

Wisconsin Court Strikes Clause Restricting Solicitation of Employees

Foley & Lardner LLP on

An engineer’s employment contract provision imposing a post-termination restriction against soliciting former co-workers to quit or to accept employment with a competitor, supplier, or customer is an unenforceable restraint...more

Jackson Lewis P.C.

Wisconsin Court Finds Anti-Poaching Agreements to be Unenforceable

Jackson Lewis P.C. on

Analyzing an anti-poaching agreement as a non-compete agreement, a Wisconsin Court of Appeals has confirmed that a former employee’s agreement not to solicit other employees may be void and unenforceable if it is too broad....more

Faegre Drinker Biddle & Reath LLP

Non-Compete Restriction Held To Be Unenforceable

In Bartholomews Agri Food Ltd v Thornton [2016] EWHC 648 (QB), the High Court considered whether a non-compete post-termination restriction was an unlawful restraint of trade. Bartholomews Agri Food Ltd (Bartholomews)...more

13 Results
 / 
View per page
Page: of 1

"My best business intelligence, in one easy email…"

Your first step to building a free, personalized, morning email brief covering pertinent authors and topics on JD Supra:
*By using the service, you signify your acceptance of JD Supra's Privacy Policy.
- hide
- hide