News & Analysis as of

Supreme Court of the United States › Food and Drug Administration (FDA)

The United States Supreme Court is the highest court of the United States and is charged with interpreting federal law, including the United States Constitution. The Court's docket is largely discretionary... more +
The United States Supreme Court is the highest court of the United States and is charged with interpreting federal law, including the United States Constitution. The Court's docket is largely discretionary with only a limited number of cases granted review each term.  The Court is comprised of one chief justice and eight associate justices, who are nominated by the President and confirmed by the Senate to hold lifetime positions. less -
Knobbe Martens

Federal Circuit Review | August 2024

Knobbe Martens on

Specify the Steps of Information Manipulation or Lose under § 101 - In Mobile Acuity Ltd. v. Blippar Ltd. Appeal No. 22-2216, the Federal Circuit held that patent claims that merely recite result-orientated, functional...more

King & Spalding

Transitional Coverage for Emerging Technologies: CMS’s Latest, But Not Necessarily Greatest, Coverage with Evidence Approach

King & Spalding on

On August 7, 2024, the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (“CMS” or the “Agency”) issued a final procedural notice (“Notice”) outlining a new Medicare coverage pathway, aimed at achieving timelier and predictable access...more

Holland & Knight LLP

What's Next for the Regulatory Landscape Post-Chevron?

Holland & Knight LLP on

For nearly 40 years and in more than 18,000 judicial opinions, federal courts have used the Chevron doctrine to defer to an agency's reasonable interpretation of an ambiguous statute. On June 28, 2024, the U.S. Supreme Court...more

Troutman Pepper

Industry Urges SCOTUS to Consider FDA Graphic Cigarette Warnings

Troutman Pepper on

In August, a group of tobacco companies filed a petition for certiorari at the U.S. Supreme Court, seeking review of a lower court’s holding that the First Amendment does not prohibit the U.S. Food and Drug Administration...more

Proskauer - Minding Your Business

The Broad Impact of Edwards v. Meril on the Safe Harbor Provision

Proskauer - Minding Your Business on

The Federal Circuit’s decision in Edwards Lifesciences Corp. v. Meril Life Sciences Pvt. Ltd., has garnered significant attention, especially concerning the application of the “safe harbor” provision under 35 U.S.C. §...more

BCLP

Selected Recent Developments for Public Companies

BCLP on

Public companies should take note of several recent developments, including: ..Reversal of the Pegasystems trade secrets lawsuit that nevertheless preserves guidance to take care when describing litigation as “without...more

Fenwick & West LLP

Disclosure Trend: Risk Factors Post-Chevron

Fenwick & West LLP on

Life sciences companies are adding risk factor language in response to the U.S. Supreme Court overturning the Chevron Doctrine. As you may recall, the U.S. Supreme Court recently overturned the Chevron Doctrine....more

Parker Poe Adams & Bernstein LLP

Two Recent Supreme Court Decisions Could Dramatically Impact Health Care Regulatory Challenges at the Federal and State Levels

Parker Poe Adams & Bernstein LLP on

For nearly 40 years, federal courts have been required to defer to an agency’s interpretation of an ambiguous statute, even if the court did not agree with that interpretation. This deference, commonly referred to as Chevron...more

Foley & Lardner LLP

FDA: The Effects of Loper on the Regulatory Agenda

Foley & Lardner LLP on

The Supreme Court’s decision in June 2024 in Loper Bright Enterprises v. Raimondo and Relentless Inc. v. Department of Commerce to overrule the Chevron doctrine has major implications for every administrative agency,...more

Akin Gump Strauss Hauer & Feld LLP

The Top 10 Takeaways for Businesses from the Supreme Court’s Three Big Administrative Law Decisions in 2024

Akin Gump Strauss Hauer & Feld LLP on

Now that the dust has settled following the Supreme Court’s overhaul of administrative law through three late-term decisions, Akin litigators and policy advisors offer the most significant takeaways for businesses and...more

Maron Marvel

Will EPA’s Recent Ban on Methylene Chloride Uses Result in Exponential Litigation Similar to Asbestos?

Maron Marvel on

Methylene chloride, also known as dirchloromethane [osha.gov], is a volatile, colorless liquid with a chloroform like odor. Historically, it has been used in various industrial processes, such as pharmaceutical manufacturing,...more

Spilman Thomas & Battle, PLLC

The Health Record - Healthcare Law Insights, Issue 3, July 2024

Spilman Thomas & Battle, PLLC on

Welcome to our third issue of The Health Record - our healthcare law insights e-newsletter! We are winding down the summer with our talented group of law students and they have continued to research and write, shadow...more

Foley Hoag LLP

Loper Bright's Implications for the Food and Drug Administration and Regulated Industry

Foley Hoag LLP on

Under the Chevron doctrine, FDA and other agencies had significant flexibility to set policy where Congress left a gap or failed to speak clearly when enacting legislation—a common occurrence given the at-times sparse...more

Husch Blackwell LLP

The Overturning of Chevron Deference: Implications for AI in Medical Research

Husch Blackwell LLP on

In a landmark decision on June 28, 2024, the Supreme Court overturned a 40-year-old legal precedent known as Chevron deference. Established in 1984, Chevron deference mandated that judges defer to federal agencies concerning...more

Jackson Lewis P.C.

What U.S. Supreme Court Decision on Standing Tells Us About Challenges to Corporate DEI Initiatives

Jackson Lewis P.C. on

The U.S. Supreme Court held that a group of doctors, nurses, and medical associations did not have the right under the U.S. Constitution, a doctrine known as “standing,” to challenge Food and Drug Administration (FDA)...more

Hogan Lovells

Chevron’s demise brings promises & perils for life sciences companies

Hogan Lovells on

The U.S. Supreme Court has issued its highly anticipated decision overturning the 40-year old doctrine established in Chevron v. Natural Resources Defense Council, which recognized judicial deference to administrative...more

ArentFox Schiff

Post-Chevron Health Care Regulations: The Dawn of a New Day

ArentFox Schiff on

On June 28, the US Supreme Court overturned the Chevron doctrine — the legal principle that the judiciary should defer to a federal agency’s reasonable interpretation of an ambiguous statute. Chevron reflected the view...more

Venable LLP

Implications of Loper Bright for FDA-Regulated Products

Venable LLP on

Recently, Venable's Government Division offered its general thoughts on the fallout from the Supreme Court's reversal of the long-standing Chevron deference principle. Here, the FDA Practice Group offers some of its own...more

Axinn, Veltrop & Harkrider LLP

The Floodgates Have Opened: Supreme Court Scuttles Chevron, Brings New Uncertainty to Regulated Industries

Axinn, Veltrop & Harkrider LLP on

For forty years, Chevron has put a thumb on the scales in favor of the executive agencies whenever their decisions were challenged in court. Now, the Supreme Court has overturned that longstanding precedent, issuing its...more

Schwabe, Williamson & Wyatt PC

Chevron’s End Means Uncertainty and Opportunity for the Healthcare Industry

Schwabe, Williamson & Wyatt PC on

“Chevron is overruled.” The U.S. Supreme Court’s June 28 decision in Loper Bright Enterprises v. Raimondo and its companion case, Relentless v. Department of Commerce, will have enormous effects on the healthcare sector....more

Akin Gump Strauss Hauer & Feld LLP

Chevron Runs Out of Gas: The Bumpy Road Ahead for Health Regulations After Loper Bright

Akin Gump Strauss Hauer & Feld LLP on

On June 28, in Loper Bright Enterprises v. Raimondo, the Supreme Court overturned the longstanding Chevron doctrine, under which courts generally granted deference to a federal agency’s reasonable interpretation of ambiguous...more

Holland & Knight LLP

What Does the Overturning of Chevron Mean for Healthcare?

Holland & Knight LLP on

The U.S. Supreme Court issued a significant ruling on June 28, 2024, that changes the respective roles of administrative agencies and the courts in interpreting statutes. In Loper Bright Enterprises v. Raimondo, the court...more

McDermott Will & Emery

Loper Bright Could Shift Outlook for FDA Legal Challenges

McDermott Will & Emery on

The US Supreme Court has overruled the longstanding Chevron doctrine, an administrative law doctrine that required courts to defer to reasonable agency interpretations of ambiguous statutes. Loper Bright Enterprises v....more

Brownstein Hyatt Farber Schreck

Health Care Impacts Following Chevron Decision

Brownstein Hyatt Farber Schreck on

On Friday, June 28, the Supreme Court overturned the longstanding Chevron doctrine, on a 6-3 vote, which had previously required courts to defer to federal agencies' reasonable interpretations of statutes within an agency’s...more

Foley Hoag LLP

Chevron’s Demise—And What It Means for Healthcare and Life Sciences Companies

Foley Hoag LLP on

Since 1984, the “Chevron doctrine” had served as the bedrock of many regulatory actions by the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) and other federal agencies. Under the doctrine, courts followed a two-step...more

259 Results
 / 
View per page
Page: of 11
Next »

"My best business intelligence, in one easy email…"

Your first step to building a free, personalized, morning email brief covering pertinent authors and topics on JD Supra:
Sign up Log in
*By using the service, you signify your acceptance of JD Supra's Privacy Policy.
- hide
- hide