News & Analysis as of

Supreme Court of the United States › First Amendment › Debt Collection

The United States Supreme Court is the highest court of the United States and is charged with interpreting federal law, including the United States Constitution. The Court's docket is largely discretionary... more +
The United States Supreme Court is the highest court of the United States and is charged with interpreting federal law, including the United States Constitution. The Court's docket is largely discretionary with only a limited number of cases granted review each term.  The Court is comprised of one chief justice and eight associate justices, who are nominated by the President and confirmed by the Senate to hold lifetime positions. less -
Orrick, Herrington & Sutcliffe LLP

2nd challenge to CFPB medical debt reporting rule filed in Texas

Orrick, Herrington & Sutcliffe LLP on

On January 8, a complaint was filed in the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of Texas challenging the CFPB’s newly finalized medical debt rule that restricts credit reporting agencies from including medical debt...more

Bradley Arant Boult Cummings LLP

Does the Eleventh Circuit’s Hunstein Decision Mean that the FDCPA Violates the First Amendment?

Bradley Arant Boult Cummings LLP on

The Eleventh Circuit’s far-reaching decision in Hunstein v. Preferred Collection and Management Services, Inc. — which we previously covered on this blog — continues to raise questions for the wide range of industries that...more

Faegre Drinker Biddle & Reath LLP

District Court Departs from Supreme Court Plurality to Find Government-Debt Collector Retroactively Liable Under TCPA — But...

Faegre Drinker Biddle & Reath LLP on

For nearly five years, the TCPA explicitly excluded from liability calls made to collect government-backed debt. Naturally, government debt collectors relied on this exception and called debtors without fear of TCPA...more

Faegre Drinker Biddle & Reath LLP

Another District Court Joins Creasy Split

Faegre Drinker Biddle & Reath LLP on

Recently, the Eastern District of Missouri added to the split among courts deciding whether they can hear TCPA claims alleging robocall violations that occurred when the now-invalidated government debt exception was part of...more

Faegre Drinker Biddle & Reath LLP

Two More District Courts Disagree with Creasy

Faegre Drinker Biddle & Reath LLP on

Confusion continues amongst federal district courts in the wake of Barr v. American Association of Political Consultants, Inc. (“AAPC”), 140 S. Ct. 2335 (2020), the Supreme Court decision that held the TCPA’s government-debt...more

Benesch

AAPC In Review

Benesch on

In July of 2020, the Supreme Court issued its highly anticipated decision in Barr v. American Association of Political Consultants, Inc., 140 S. Ct. 2335 (2020), known ever since as the AAPC decision. The Supreme Court set...more

Faegre Drinker Biddle & Reath LLP

Northern District of Florida Picks Side in Creasy Split

Faegre Drinker Biddle & Reath LLP on

In the aftermath of Barr v. American Association of Political Consultants, Inc.—the Supreme Court decision from July that held the TCPA’s government-debt exception to be an unconstitutional content-based restriction on...more

Faegre Drinker Biddle & Reath LLP

Eastern District of California Adds to Creasy Split

Faegre Drinker Biddle & Reath LLP on

As we have reported... a growing number of district courts are issuing opinions addressing whether they have subject matter jurisdiction over TCPA claims alleging robocall violations that occurred when the government debt...more

Eversheds Sutherland (US) LLP

Dialing In: TCPA Top 5 Issues for 2021

Eversheds Sutherland (US) LLP on

Will anything stop the continuing barrage of class action lawsuits under the Telephone Consumer Protection Act (TCPA)? In 2020, TCPA lawsuits remained one of the most commonly-filed type of class action in federal courts...more

Faegre Drinker Biddle & Reath LLP

First-of-its-Kind Decision Rejects Liability for Calls Made Before Supreme Court Cured TCPA's Unconstitutionality by Invalidating...

Faegre Drinker Biddle & Reath LLP on

Charter Communications may have just helped literally thousands of TCPA defendants snatch victory from the jaws of defeat. As our regular readers know, the Supreme Court recently held in Barr v. AAPC that a recent addition...more

King & Spalding

Supreme Court Strikes Down TCPA Exception—While Keeping the Remainder of the Act Intact—and Will Soon Address “Autodialer”...

King & Spalding on

On July 6, the Supreme Court issued a long-awaited decision in Barr v. American Association of Political Consultants addressing whether a provision of the Telephone Consumer Protection Act (“TCPA”)—which generally prohibits...more

Sheppard Mullin Richter & Hampton LLP

TCPA’s 2015 Government-Debt Collection Exception Struck Down- Now What?

Sheppard Mullin Richter & Hampton LLP on

The Supreme Court’s recent decision in Barr v. American Association of Political Consultants held the government-debt exception of the TCPA unconstitutional under the First Amendment’s Free Speech Clause. This means that...more

Foley & Lardner LLP

Supreme Court TCPA News: Government Debt Collectors Beware and Autodialers Under Review

Foley & Lardner LLP on

The Supreme Court is showing interest in the Telephone Consumer Protection Act (TCPA), which is designed to control certain unwanted calls, and which over the last decade has been a favored tool of the plaintiffs’ bar to...more

Orrick, Herrington & Sutcliffe LLP

The Supreme Court Is Positioning to Take On TCPA

Orrick, Herrington & Sutcliffe LLP on

On July 6, 2020, the United States Supreme Court issued its ruling in Barr v. American Ass’n of Political Consultants, a case in which the plaintiffs challenged a government-debt collection exception to the Telephone Consumer...more

Jackson Lewis P.C.

Supreme Court Weighs In On TCPA Constitutionality

Jackson Lewis P.C. on

In a much-anticipated Supreme Court decision, Barr v. American Association of Political Consultants, sure to impact the future of the Telephone Consumer Protection Act (“TCPA”), the Court addressed the issue of whether the...more

Morrison & Foerster LLP - Class Dismissed

Federally-Backed Debt Collection Exception Not The Supreme Court’s Cup Of T(CPA)

Morrison & Foerster LLP - Class Dismissed on

Barr v. Am. Ass’n of Political Consultants, Inc., 2020 WL 3633780, 591 U.S. __ (2020).[1] Earlier this month, the Supreme Court held, in a fractured decision yielding multiple concurring or dissenting opinions, that the...more

Payne & Fears

Supreme Court Makes More Robocalls Illegal and Will Determine What Is a Robocall Soon

Payne & Fears on

Since 1991 the Telephone Consumer Protection Act, or TCPA, has regulated robocalls, which are loosely defined as calls or texts using automatic telephone dialing systems (a/k/a an “autodialer”). In 2015, Congress excluded...more

BCLP

SCOTUS Upholds TCPA but Strikes Government Debt Collection Exception

BCLP on

The Telephone Consumer Protection Act ("TCPA") has been the subject of significant class and consumer litigation risk exposure for many industries, including financial institutions. In a July 6 ruling, the United States...more

Kilpatrick

TCPA Class Actions - Supreme Court Severs Government Debt Collection Exception

Kilpatrick on

Takeaway: In Barr v. American Association of Political Consultants, Inc, No. 19-631, 2020 WL 3633780 (U.S. July 6, 2020), the Supreme Court invalidated the exception for calls made for the purpose of collecting government...more

McGlinchey Stafford

Florida Real Property & Business Litigation Report, Volume 13, Issue 28

McGlinchey Stafford on

Barr v. American Association of Political Consultants, Inc., Case No. 19–631 (2020). The federal government cannot exempt itself from the anti-robocall provisions of the Telephone Consumer Protection Act of 1991, 47 U. S. C....more

Cooley LLP

Alert: Supreme Court Preserves Limits on Autodialed Calls to Cell Phones, Overturns Government Debt Collection Exception

Cooley LLP on

In a widely anticipated decision in Barr v. American Association of Political Consultants, the US Supreme Court determined that an exception to the Telephone Consumer Protection Act (TCPA) that allowed robocalls to mobile...more

Spilman Thomas & Battle, PLLC

All Consuming - Financial Litigation Insights: Issue 3, July 2020

Spilman Thomas & Battle, PLLC on

Welcome! Welcome to the new format of All Consuming . We listened to the feedback. A newsletter filled with long articles gives the detailed information some are looking for but becomes another thing that others have to...more

Cozen O'Connor

What High Court Ruling Means For TCPA's Future

Cozen O'Connor on

On July 6, the U.S. Supreme Court issued its ruling in Barr v. American Association of Political Consultants Inc. The court declined to invalidate the Telephone Consumer Protection Act's automated calls to cellphones...more

Hogan Lovells

U.S. Supreme Court Finds TCPA’s Federal-Debts Exemption Unconstitutional; Leaves Rest of TCPA Intact

Hogan Lovells on

On June 6, 2020, the U.S. Supreme Court issued its decision in Barr v. American Association of Political Consultants, Inc., et al., settling an issue that has lingered over litigation under the Telephone Consumer Protection...more

Seyfarth Shaw LLP

The U.S. Supreme Court Broadens The TCPA Class Action Trap For Unwary Businesses

Seyfarth Shaw LLP on

Seyfarth Synopsis: While many businesses hoped that the U.S. Supreme Court would blow up the ban on autodialed calls in the Telephone Consumer Protection Act (“TCPA”), on July 6, 2020, the nation’s highest court issued its...more

52 Results
 / 
View per page
Page: of 3
Next »

"My best business intelligence, in one easy email…"

Your first step to building a free, personalized, morning email brief covering pertinent authors and topics on JD Supra:
Sign up Log in
*By using the service, you signify your acceptance of JD Supra's Privacy Policy.
- hide
- hide