News & Analysis as of

Supreme Court of the United States › Immigrants

The United States Supreme Court is the highest court of the United States and is charged with interpreting federal law, including the United States Constitution. The Court's docket is largely discretionary... more +
The United States Supreme Court is the highest court of the United States and is charged with interpreting federal law, including the United States Constitution. The Court's docket is largely discretionary with only a limited number of cases granted review each term.  The Court is comprised of one chief justice and eight associate justices, who are nominated by the President and confirmed by the Senate to hold lifetime positions. less -
McAfee & Taft

Steadying the ship: What employers need to know about navigating the CHNV program’s turbulent waters

McAfee & Taft on

The CHNV Parole Program, a significant humanitarian initiative, allows nationals from Cuba, Haiti, Nicaragua, and Venezuela (CHNV) to temporarily enter the United States. Designed to address urgent humanitarian needs, the...more

Seyfarth Shaw LLP

CHNV Parole Pause, Continued: Mass Terminations Still Blocked, but SCOTUS Appeal Looms

Seyfarth Shaw LLP on

In the ongoing narrative of the Trump administration’s attempt to repeal the Humanitarian Parole program for Cuba, Haiti, Nicaragua, and Venezuela (CHNV), on Monday, May 5th, the US Court of Appeals for the First Circuit...more

Jackson Lewis P.C.

Do Weekends Count? SCOTUS Decides They Don’t for Voluntary-Departure Deadline

Jackson Lewis P.C. on

On calculating a noncitizen’s voluntary-departure deadline, the U.S. Supreme Court held that a deadline that falls on a weekend or legal holiday automatically extends to the next business day. Monsalvo Velázquez v. Bondi, No....more

Skadden, Arps, Slate, Meagher & Flom LLP

Supreme Court Could Soon Rule on the Merits in Challenges to the Trump Administration - The Trump Administration’s First 100 Days

Skadden, Arps, Slate, Meagher & Flom LLP on

The U.S. Supreme Court has taken a cautious approach to the Trump administration’s wide-ranging actions....more

Dorsey & Whitney LLP

The Supreme Court Update - April 22, 2025

Dorsey & Whitney LLP on

The Supreme Court of the United States issued one decision today: Monsalvo Velázquez v. Bondi, No. 23-929: The Court addressed whether the 60-day voluntary-departure deadline to leave the country rolls over to the next...more

Harris Beach Murtha PLLC

U.S. Supreme Court to Interpret 14th Amendment’s Citizenship Clause

Harris Beach Murtha PLLC on

On January 20, 2025, President Donald Trump signed Executive Order 14160, titled “Protecting the Meaning and Value of American Citizenship,” aiming to narrow the application of birthright citizenship in the United States. The...more

Jackson Lewis P.C.

SCOTUS to Consider Emergency Applications to Lift Nationwide Injunctions on EO Ending Birthright Citizenship?

Jackson Lewis P.C. on

The Trump Administration urged the U.S. Supreme Court to limit nationwide injunctions blocking enforcement of the executive order (EO) to end birthright citizenship. Following his inauguration on Jan. 20, 2025, President...more

Akin Gump Strauss Hauer & Feld LLP

Restoring The Death Penalty And Protecting Public Safety

Akin Gump Strauss Hauer & Feld LLP on

Summary - The Order requires that laws authorizing capital punishment are respected and faithfully implemented. The Attorney General is mandated to pursue the death penalty for all crimes of a severity demanding its use,...more

Jackson Lewis P.C.

DACA Case Update: Appeals Court’s Focus on Standing

Jackson Lewis P.C. on

Legal standing to sue is central to various state challenges to immigration policies. A party can only bring a lawsuit if they can demonstrate sufficient connection and harm from the challenged policy. The U.S. Supreme Court...more

Jackson Lewis P.C.

Supreme Court Reaffirms Federal Courts Lack Authority to Review Visa Denials

Jackson Lewis P.C. on

In a 6-3 ruling in U.S. Department of State et al v. Munoz et al (Case Number 23-334), the Supreme Court of the United States (SCOTUS) reaffirmed the doctrine of consular nonreviewability ruling against a U.S. citizen’s...more

Epstein Becker & Green

Late-Term Flood of Decisions Continues, Disagreement Among Justices Increasingly Pronounced - SCOTUS Today

Epstein Becker & Green on

With the current term of the Supreme Court soon to end, the run of decisions in which the Justices have been unanimous or close to it is being displaced by the “tougher” ones, in which there is substantial disagreement....more

Dorsey & Whitney LLP

The Supreme Court Update - March 20, 2024

Dorsey & Whitney LLP on

On March 19, 2024, the Supreme Court of the United States issued two decisions: FBI v. Fikre, 22-1178: This case addresses when the “voluntary cessation of a challenged practice” renders a lawsuit moot. Yonas Fikre, a...more

Epstein Becker & Green

Two Plaintiffs Win Border Battles as Court Emphasizes When It Has Jurisdiction in Cases with Substantial Factual Issues - SCOTUS...

Epstein Becker & Green on

Yonas Fikre, a U.S. citizen who had emigrated from Sudan, found himself placed on the No Fly List by the FBI and unable to return to the United States from an international trip. This action followed Fikre’s having been...more

Patterson Belknap Webb & Tyler LLP

Over Dissent, Circuit Embraces Strict “Collateral/Direct” Distinction for Ineffective Assistance of Counsel Claims

Patterson Belknap Webb & Tyler LLP on

In Padilla v. Kentucky, 559 U.S. 356 (2010), the Supreme Court held that attorneys must advise their noncitizen clients of the risk of deportation arising from criminal conviction, and that the failure to do so violates the...more

Faegre Drinker Biddle & Reath LLP

Supreme Court Decides Patel v. Garland

Faegre Drinker Biddle & Reath LLP on

On May 16, 2022, the U.S. Supreme Court decided Patel v. Garland, No. 20-979, holding that federal courts lack jurisdiction to review an immigration judge’s findings of fact pertaining to a removable immigrant’s petition for...more

Dorsey & Whitney LLP

The Supreme Court - June 29, 2021

Dorsey & Whitney LLP on

Minerva Surgical, Inc. v. Hologic, Inc., No. 20-440: In the late 1990s, Csaba Truckai invented and patented a device to treat abnormal uterine bleeding. Truckai assigned his interest to his company, Novacept, which in turn...more

Faegre Drinker Biddle & Reath LLP

Supreme Court Decides Niz-Chavez v. Garland

Faegre Drinker Biddle & Reath LLP on

On April 29, 2021, the U.S. Supreme Court decided Niz-Chavez v. Garland, holding that, to constitute a notice to appear sufficient to stop a nonpermanent resident alien’s continuous presence in the country under 8 U.S.C. §...more

Jackson Lewis P.C.

Dropping Public Charge Rule, DHS Announces Return To Previous Policy To Determine Admissibility

Jackson Lewis P.C. on

Secretary of the Department of Homeland Security (DHS) Alejandro Mayorkas has announced that the public charge rule, put in place by the Trump administration in 2019, is no longer in effect. Instead, DHS will return to its...more

Jackson Lewis P.C.

Noncitizen Bears Burden Of Proof When Challenging Deportation, U.S. Supreme Court Rules

Jackson Lewis P.C. on

A noncitizen applying for relief from deportation bears the burden of proving all elements of eligibility for relief, including that a conviction under a divisible state statute does not render the person ineligible for...more

Fisher Phillips

What Employers Need To Know About SCOTUS Nominee Amy Coney Barrett

Fisher Phillips on

President Trump officially selected Judge Amy Coney Barrett to fill the empty seat on the Supreme Court bench, filling the vacancy caused by Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg’s death. Assuming she is confirmed by the Senate, Judge...more

Shook, Hardy & Bacon L.L.P.

Privacy and Data Security Client Alert | April 2019

Shook, Hardy & Bacon L.L.P. on

Hotel Chain Pays $12 Million to Resolve Privacy Violations - Motel 6 settled claims with the Washington State Attorney General for $12 million to resolve charges that Motel 6 violated the Consumer Protection Act and the...more

UB Greensfelder LLP

Divided Supreme Court Rules Some Immigrants Not Entitled to Bond Hearings

UB Greensfelder LLP on

Yesterday, the U.S. Supreme Court held that some immigrants do not have a right to a bond hearing, even when they were not immediately detained years after being released from criminal custody. The Court’s decision reverses...more

Foley Hoag LLP

SCOTUS Overturns Decision on Bond Hearings for Detainees Subject to Indefinite Detention

Foley Hoag LLP on

Do noncitizens detained for a long time while their cases are pending have the right to a hearing to determine whether they can be released on bond? This was the question posed in the Jennings v. Rodriguez case, a...more

Jackson Lewis P.C.

Travel Ban Case At The U.S. Supreme Court, But DACA Will Wait

Jackson Lewis P.C. on

The Supreme Court is now in the middle of two high-profile immigration cases: Travel Ban 3.0 and the DACA rescission. The Court let President Donald Trump’s travel ban go in effect while litigation challenging the ban is...more

Dorsey & Whitney LLP

The Supreme Court - February 27, 2018

Dorsey & Whitney LLP on

Merit Management Group, LP v. FTI Consulting, Inc., No. 16-784: Prior to filing for Chapter 11 Bankruptcy, Valley View Downs, which sought to operate a racetrack casino in Pennsylvania, transferred $55 million to its...more

43 Results
 / 
View per page
Page: of 2
Next »

"My best business intelligence, in one easy email…"

Your first step to building a free, personalized, morning email brief covering pertinent authors and topics on JD Supra:
Sign up Log in
*By using the service, you signify your acceptance of JD Supra's Privacy Policy.
- hide
- hide