News & Analysis as of

Statute of Limitations › Supreme Court of the United States › Tibble v Edison Int

Statute of Limitations refers to a statute that sets the time period during which a legal claim can be brought. Most statute of limitations laws require individuals to sue at some point during a set period... more +
Statute of Limitations refers to a statute that sets the time period during which a legal claim can be brought. Most statute of limitations laws require individuals to sue at some point during a set period usually commencing from the date of the wrong or injury or the discovery of the wrong or injury. Except for under a limited set of circumstances, if an individual does not file a suit within the specified time period, the law bars them from ever suing on that claim. less -
Mintz - Employment Viewpoints

The Big Mistake Too Many Retirement Plan Fiduciary Committees are Making—And What to Do About It

Mintz - Employment Viewpoints on

Formally organized retirement plan committees have become the norm in recent years. Retirement plans, particularly 401(k) plans, have increasingly adopted consultant-advised governance structures that include fiduciary...more

Stinson - Benefits Notes Blog

Tibble and Class Action Plaintiffs Win Round Two versus Edison International and Its 401(k) Investment Committees

Stinson - Benefits Notes Blog on

In past articles in this Blog I reported on decisions of the 9th Circuit Court of Appeals and ultimately the U.S. Supreme Court dealing with a class action for breach of fiduciary duty for selecting retail mutual funds in...more

Adler Pollock & Sheehan P.C.

U.S. Supreme Court Rules That Employers Must Periodically Review Investment Options In 401(k) Plans And Remove Imprudent Funds

Adler Pollock & Sheehan P.C. on

An employer has fiduciary duties with respect to the 401(k) plan it provides its employees. Those duties include the obligation to choose prudent investment options and to consider the fees associated with service providers...more

Laner Muchin, Ltd.

Supreme Court Emphasizes Requirements About Selecting and Monitoring Plan Investments

Laner Muchin, Ltd. on

Plan administrators, investment committees and any other plan fiduciary responsible for selectingthe investment options of an employee benefit plan subject to ERISA should take note of the recent U.S. Supreme Court ruling in...more

King & Spalding

UPDATE: The U.S. Supreme Court Decides ERISA Statute of Limitations Case – Implications for Plan Fiduciaries

King & Spalding on

Last November, we reported that the Supreme Court had granted certiorari in Tibble v. Edison International, a Ninth Circuit decision holding that a claim that a plan fiduciary breached its duty of prudence in selecting plan...more

Tucker Arensberg, P.C.

United State Supreme Court Confirms ERISA Fiduciary’s Continuing Duty To Monitor Investments

Tucker Arensberg, P.C. on

In its Tibble v. Edison International decision the United State Supreme Court confirmed that the scope of an ERISA fiduciary’s duty of prudence continues after initial investments are made and imposes an ongoing duty to...more

Proskauer - Employee Benefits & Executive...

U.S. Supreme Court Says “Regular Review” of ERISA Investments Required

Proskauer - Employee Benefits & Executive... on

ERISA plan fiduciaries charged with responsibility for selecting, monitoring or removing plan investment options should pay close attention to the U.S. Supreme Court’s recent ruling in Tibble v. Edison Intl., 135 S. Ct. 1823...more

Proskauer Rose LLP

The ERISA Litigation Newsletter - June 2015

Proskauer Rose LLP on

Editor's Overview - In this month's newsletter, Anthony Cacace analyzes the heavily anticipated Supreme Court ruling in Tibble v. Edison Intl., 135 S. Ct. 1823 (2015), where the Court held that ERISA's fiduciary duty of...more

Goodwin

Supreme Court Vacates Decision Applying Statute of Limitations in Excessive Fee Case

Goodwin on

In a highly anticipated decision concerning 401(k) excessive fee litigation, the U.S. Supreme Court ruled in favor of the plaintiffs in Tibble v. Edison, Int’l, No. 13-550, vacating the lower court’s decision that had found...more

Baker Donelson

SCOTUS Reinforces ERISA Fiduciaries' Continuing Duty To Monitor Plan Investments

Baker Donelson on

Recently, in Tibble v Edison International, 575 U.S.(2015), the United States Supreme Court addressed the application of the Employment Retirement Income Security Act (ERISA) statute of limitations for violations of fiduciary...more

Womble Bond Dickinson

Once Again, the Supreme Court Upsets Precedent in Fourth and Eleventh Circuit

Womble Bond Dickinson on

As we reported in our March 11, 2014 article, the Eleventh and Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals definitively rejected the “continuing breach” theory in recent disputes involving statute of limitations deadlines in ERISA cases...more

Ary Rosenbaum - The Rosenbaum Law Firm P.C.

Advisors Advantage - June 2015

Ary Rosenbaum - The Rosenbaum Law Firm P.C. on

In This Issue: - For Retirement Plan Providers, It's All About Making A Connection - DOL Comment Period Extended - Supreme Trouble with Tibbles - My Referrals Aren't For Sale And Neither Should Yours ...more

Polsinelli

Supreme Court Reminds Companies to Monitor 401(k) Plan Investments, Sets Parameters for "Regular Review" Requirements

Polsinelli on

Companies and in-house fiduciaries face increasing scrutiny these days over their 401(k) and other retirement plans. This was underscored again recently by a key Supreme Court ruling. In Tibble v. Edison International, the...more

Carlton Fields

What Does the Supreme Court’s Tibble Ruling Mean for Practitioners and ERISA Fiduciaries?

Carlton Fields on

The Supreme Court’s recent decision in Tibble v. Edison Int’l, et al., --- S.Ct. ---, Case No. 13-550, 2015 WL 2340845 (May 18, 2015), is perhaps more interesting for what the Court did not decide than for what it did....more

Poyner Spruill LLP

Yes Virginia, There is a Duty to Monitor Retirement Plan Investments

Poyner Spruill LLP on

In a recent unanimous ruling the U.S. Supreme Court confirmed what most retirement plan professionals already knew: ERISA requires plan investment fiduciaries to monitor investments and remove imprudent ones. Surprisingly to...more

Parker Poe Adams & Bernstein LLP

Supreme Court Affirms Duty to Monitor Plan Investments

Parker Poe Adams & Bernstein LLP on

The Supreme Court’s decision will undermine a plan fiduciary’s ability to assert a statute of limitations defense based on when an investment option was added; rather, the six year statute of limitations will be measured from...more

Cozen O'Connor

Supreme Court Expands Scope of Fiduciary Liability

Cozen O'Connor on

In Tibble v. Edison International, the U.S. Supreme Court expanded the scope of the duty of prudence owed by ERISA fiduciaries. Although ostensibly a case about the statute of limitations, the Court ruled that trustees of...more

Weintraub Tobin

Supreme Court Hits Home Run for 401(K) Plan Beneficiaries

Weintraub Tobin on

This week’s decision by the United States Supreme Court in Tibble v. Edison International, 2015 U.S. LEXIS 3171 (May 18, 2015), is expected to trigger an increase in lawsuits against 401(k) plan fiduciaries....more

Goodwin

Financial Services Weekly News Roundup - May 2015 #5

Goodwin on

SEC Enforcement Action on FCPA Compliance – Check the Box Is Not Enough. On May 20 the SEC announced that global resources company BHP Billiton had agreed to pay $25 million to settle charges that it had violated the...more

Dickinson Wright

U.S. Supreme Court Decision on ERISA Fiduciary Duty Statute of Limitations Case Provides Broad Principle But Little Practical...

Dickinson Wright on

Last week the U.S. Supreme Court issued its opinion in Tibble v. Edison International, a highly anticipated case involving whether ERISA’s six year statute of limitations for breach of fiduciary duty claims prevented a claim...more

Holland & Knight LLP

Supreme Court: ERISA Fiduciaries Have Ongoing Duty to Monitor Investments - Selection of Plan Investment Alternative Is Not a...

Holland & Knight LLP on

In Tibble v. Edison International, 13-550 (U.S. May 18, 2015), the U.S. Supreme Court ruled that the Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974 (ERISA) requires ERISA plan fiduciaries to monitor plan investments for...more

Ary Rosenbaum - The Rosenbaum Law Firm P.C.

Supreme Trouble with Tibble

Ary Rosenbaum - The Rosenbaum Law Firm P.C. on

While the Supreme Court ruled in the monumental 401(k) case Tibble v. Edison that mostly dealt with statute of limitations issues, one could read something into it a little more. Tibble was the case where the District...more

Williams Mullen

Supreme Court Rules on Plan Fiduciaries Duty to Monitor Plan Investments

Williams Mullen on

In a unanimous decision, the U.S. Supreme Court held on Monday, May 18, 2015, that a plan trustee has a continuing duty to adequately monitor plan investments and remove imprudent ones. Tibble v. Edison, Int’l, 2015 BL...more

Pillsbury Winthrop Shaw Pittman LLP

Supreme Court Ruling Heightens Pressure on Fiduciaries to Monitor 401(k) Plan Investments

Pillsbury Winthrop Shaw Pittman LLP on

On May 18th, the U.S. Supreme Court unanimously held in Tibble et al. v. Edison International et al., No. 13-550 (S. Ct. May 18, 2015) that ordinary principles of trust law impose on ERISA fiduciaries a duty to continually...more

Dechert LLP

Some Limited Trouble with Tibble? Part II –Supreme Court Decides Excessive-Fee Case Involving 401(k) Plan

Dechert LLP on

Earlier this week, the U.S. Supreme Court unanimously decided the case of Tibble v. Edison International. In Tibble, the Court held that the statute of limitations under the Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974...more

36 Results
 / 
View per page
Page: of 2
Next »

"My best business intelligence, in one easy email…"

Your first step to building a free, personalized, morning email brief covering pertinent authors and topics on JD Supra:
Sign up Log in
*By using the service, you signify your acceptance of JD Supra's Privacy Policy.
- hide
- hide