News & Analysis as of

Subjective Standard

Fox Rothschild LLP

FCA 101: Knowledge

Fox Rothschild LLP on

In this blog post, we will explore the knowledge element. Despite being a fraud statute, the FCA does not require specific intent to defraud the government to impose liability. Instead, the FCA defines culpable “knowing,”...more

A&O Shearman

Eastern District Of Pennsylvania Denies Motion To Compel The Election Of Defendants’ “Subjective Beliefs”

A&O Shearman on

On August 22, 2024, Judge Harvey Bartle III of the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania denied a motion to compel defendants to provide information concerning the “subjective beliefs” of their...more

Ackerman & Ackerman, P.C.

How to Make “Just Compensation” More “Just” for Displaced Homeowners

Last summer, I wrote a blog about why just compensation—which is based on the ‘objective’ standard of what a property would sell for on the open market—shortchanges residential property owners subjected to eminent domain. In...more

Ackerman & Ackerman, P.C.

When Market Value Isn’t Enough: The Pitfalls of Objectively Measured Just Compensation

When we take on an eminent domain case, our primary goal is to put our client in the best position possible.  In some cases, that means fighting the taking itself, as my dad (and boss) did in the well-known Wayne County v....more

Epstein Becker & Green

SuperValu’s Effect on the FCA Scienter Standard and Impact to Future Litigation

Epstein Becker & Green on

n June 1, 2023, the U.S. Supreme Court unanimously settled a long-standing dispute over a subjective versus objective standard for scienter under the False Claims Act (FCA), holding that a defendant’s own subjective belief is...more

Dickinson Wright

False Claims Act “Knowledge” Is a Subjective Standard

Dickinson Wright on

The Federal False Claims Act (“FCA”) allows private parties to bring lawsuits in the name of the federal government against defendants who allegedly “knowingly” present a false claim to the government for payment. The...more

Husch Blackwell LLP

False Claims Act Update: A Mid-Year Review (2023)

Husch Blackwell LLP on

The Supreme Court issued a number of headline-grabbing decisions this term on topics like religious accommodation, LGBTQ protections, and consideration of race in college admissions. These decisions are wide-reaching and...more

Miller Canfield

Supreme Court Ruling Strengthens Government’s Ability to Voluntarily Dismiss Whistleblower Lawsuits

Miller Canfield on

The United States Supreme Court has ruled in an 8-1 decision that the U.S. government has broad authority to dismiss whistleblower actions over the individual whistleblower’s objections so long as the government intervenes...more

Jackson Lewis P.C.

U.S. Supreme Court: False Claims Act Liability Depends on Defendant’s Subjective Beliefs

Jackson Lewis P.C. on

Liability in False Claims Act (FCA) suits depends on whether a defendant subjectively believed its claims were false, not on whether it can offer an objectively reasonable basis for its claims, the U.S. Supreme Court has held...more

Proskauer - Health Care Law Brief

The Supreme Court’s Ruling Narrows Available FCA Scienter Defenses

In a unanimous opinion, the United States Supreme Court (“Court”) recently held that the False Claims Act’s (“FCA”) scienter requirement refers to a defendant’s knowledge and subjective beliefs, rather than what a...more

Orrick, Herrington & Sutcliffe LLP

Supreme Court False Claims Act Ruling May Affect Paycheck Protection Program Lenders

On June 1, the Supreme Court ruled that entities that submit false claims to the government can be liable if they subjectively believed the claims were false at the time of submission. ...more

Littler

Supreme Court: False Claims Act Liability Depends on Defendant’s Subjective Belief

Littler on

On June 1, 2023, in United States ex rel. Schutte, the United States Supreme Court held that, to impose liability on an employer for “knowingly” submitting a false claim to the government for payment, it is sufficient for the...more

Venable LLP

Yes, Contractors and Providers, What You Think Matters - U.S. Supreme Court Unanimously Holds That Defendants' Subjective Beliefs...

Venable LLP on

On June 1, 2023, the U.S. Supreme Court issued a unanimous opinion in United States ex rel. Schutte v. SuperValu Inc. reversing a pair of False Claims Act (FCA) cases on review from the Seventh Circuit Court of Appeals. In...more

Snell & Wilmer

Supreme Court Sides With Government (and Whistleblowers) in Preserving Relevance of Subjective Intent in FCA Cases

Snell & Wilmer on

In one of the most highly-anticipated decisions of this term, on Thursday, June 1, 2023, the United States Supreme Court ruled that a contractor’s liability in False Claims Act (FCA) cases hinges on subjective intent — i.e.,...more

Goodwin

The Supreme Court Holds that the False Claims Act’s Scienter Element Turns on Defendant’s Subjective Beliefs, Rejecting Seventh...

Goodwin on

The Supreme Court recently issued a significant decision clarifying what it means to “knowingly” submit a false claim under the False Claims Act. At issue in United States ex rel. Schutte v. SuperValu Inc. were allegations...more

Morgan Lewis

In Key FCA Scienter Opinion, US Supreme Court Turns Focus on Subjective Intent

Morgan Lewis on

The United States Supreme Court held on June 1 that the False Claims Act’s (FCA) scienter element requires analysis of the defendant’s subjective intent at the time of the alleged false claim, and that a defendant can be...more

WilmerHale

Supreme Court Holds That False Claims Act Requires Subjective Inquiry

WilmerHale on

On June 1, 2023, the Supreme Court decided a pair of closely watched False Claims Act (FCA) cases, U.S. ex rel. Schutte v. SuperValu Inc., No. 21-1326, and U.S. ex rel. Proctor v. Safeway, Inc., No. 22-111....more

Stevens & Lee

Supreme Court Rules Knowledge and Subjective Belief Are Key for False Claims Act Liability

Stevens & Lee on

In a unanimous decision Thrsday, the U.S. Supreme Court, in an opinion written by Justice Thomas, ruled that the False Claims Act’s (“FCA”) scienter element refers to a defendant’s knowledge and subjective beliefs — not to...more

Jackson Lewis P.C.

Pennsylvania Appellate Court Affirms Summary Judgment in Whistleblower Case

Jackson Lewis P.C. on

Whistleblower claims of all types generally require proof of three elements; a complaint of conduct believed to be unlawful (protected activity), some form of discipline (an adverse action), and proof that the adverse action...more

Husch Blackwell LLP

SCOTUS Signals Likely Reversal in SuperValu, Arguments Reflect Concerns over Application to Other FCA Cases

Husch Blackwell LLP on

On April 18, 2023, the United States Supreme Court heard oral argument in two consolidated cases that have the potential to upend False Claims Act (FCA) litigation. Oral argument on both sides and questioning from the...more

Bradley Arant Boult Cummings LLP

Supreme Court to Consider False Claims Act “Objectively Reasonable” Knowledge Standard

In what may lead to the biggest FCA opinion in recent history, the U.S. Supreme Court earlier this month agreed to consider two cases addressing the necessary state of mind (i.e., “scienter”) to violate the FCA....more

Steptoe & Johnson PLLC

Supreme Court Rules in Favor of Physicians in Overprescribing Cases

The U.S. Supreme Court unanimously agreed that in prosecuting cases against physicians under the Controlled Substances Act (CSA), if the alleged physician demonstrates that his or her conduct is authorized per the CSA, the...more

Quarles & Brady LLP

High Court Rules “State of Mind” Relevant in Prosecuting Prescribers under the Controlled Substance Act

Quarles & Brady LLP on

Last week the Supreme Court ("the Court") released a decision holding that the Federal Controlled Substance Act (the "Act") provision that criminalizes the dispensing of a controlled substance “except as authorized” includes...more

McDermott Will & Emery

Eighth Circuit Applies Subjective Standard to Reasonable Basis Penalty Defense

On April 24, 2020, the US Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit published its opinion in Wells Fargo & Co. v. United States, No. 17-3578, affirming a district court’s holdings that the taxpayer was not entitled to certain...more

Holland & Hart - Your Trial Message

Question the Legal Fiction of the ‘Reasonable Person’

The idea of something being a “Legal Fiction” is that it is treated as true for the purposes of the law, but it is not literally true. “A corporation is a person” is perhaps one of the best known of these legal fictions, and...more

27 Results
 / 
View per page
Page: of 2

"My best business intelligence, in one easy email…"

Your first step to building a free, personalized, morning email brief covering pertinent authors and topics on JD Supra:
*By using the service, you signify your acceptance of JD Supra's Privacy Policy.
- hide
- hide