Gaming Legal News: April 6, 2012 • Volume 5, Number 7: Unnamed Developers Seek Constitutional Amendment For Eight New Casinos In... by Dickinson Wright on 4/12/2012 A group of unnamed developers operating under the title “Citizens for More Michigan Jobs” obtained approval from the Michigan Board of State Canvassers on April 3, 2012, as to the form of a petition to amend Michigan’s...more
Are Florida Right of Way Corridor Preservation Ordinances Unconstitutional? Land Owner Wins First Round in Federal Fight by Rosa Eckstein Schechter on 4/11/2012 In Florida land development, how traffic moves through an area is important - and years in advance of any roadway being constructed, there are land planners who work hard to determine where roads (highways, streets, etc.) are...more
Legislature Meets First Committee Deadline by Winthrop & Weinstine, P.A. on 3/19/2012 The Minnesota Legislature had a busy week at the Capitol, working to meet their first deadline. The deadline for committees to act favorably on bills in the house of origin is midnight on Friday. Committees must act favorably...more
Redevelopment Law Unconstitutional Because of Impairment of Contract? by Sheppard Mullin Richter & Hampton LLP on 3/13/2012 Largely lost in the noise and furor surrounding the decision by the California Supreme Court upholding AB 1X 26 (California Redevelopment Association v. Matosantos (2011) 53 Cal.4th 231, which terminated the functions of...more
In a Landmark Decision, the Texas Supreme Court Recognizes Vested Property Interest in Groundwater "In Place" by Jackson Walker on 2/29/2012 On February 24, 2012, the Texas Supreme Court issued its long-awaited decision in Edwards Aquifer Authority v. Day, one of the most significant water law cases in years. In a unanimous decision, the Court ruled that,...more
Texas Supreme Court Heard Condemnation Case Today - $48,000 or $21 million? by Jackson Walker on 2/28/2012 Today the Texas Supreme Court heard an oral argument to decide whether a pipeline company will pay $48,000 or $21 million to condemn 24 acres for a gas processing facility. Rent was less than $23,000 annually; the...more
PA Tax Notes by McNees Wallace & Nurick LLC on 2/24/2012 Interest on Real Estate Tax Overpayments The Commonwealth Court has held that the provisions of the Local Taxpayer Bill of Rights apply to refunds of real estate taxes, requiring that interest be calculated from the...more
Marzulla Law Legal Report - February 2012 by Nancie G. Marzulla on 2/13/2012 In This Newsletter: - Marzulla Law Asks U.S. Supreme Court to Decide Standing of Municipal Taxpayers In February 2009, Highway J Citizens Group, U.A., an associationin southeastern Wisconsin that promotes...more
Wisconsin group petitions high court for certiorari by Nancie G. Marzulla on 2/9/2012 Article originally published in the WISCONSIN LAW JOURNAL - Monday, February 6, 2012. A Wisconsin-based citizens group is asking the U.S. Supreme Court to review a case challenging the annexation of a business...more
Proposed Constitutional Amendment on Eminent Domain: Cons and Pros by Sands Anderson PC on 2/3/2012 The proposed eminent domain constitutional amendment is pending at the 2012 Virginia General Assembly. See 2012′s bills on the amendment, HJ 3 and SJ 3. If these...more
California Supreme Court Upholds Elimination of Redevelopment Agencies by Allen Matkins Leck Gamble Mallory & Natsis... on 1/4/2012 In a highly anticipated decision, the California Supreme Court ruled on December 29, 2011, that legislation adopted in July to dissolve redevelopment agencies is constitutional, but that legislation adopted concurrently to...more
Legal Update: California Supreme Court Ruling Winds Up Redevelopment Agencies: Legislative Reform May be Next by Miller Starr Regalia on 1/2/2012 In an opinion filed December 29, 2011, the California Supreme Court upheld Assembly Bill 1X 26, which dissolves redevelopment agencies as of October 1, 2011. The opinion also invalidated Assembly Bill 1X 27, which provides...more
Magner v. Gallagher Brief Amicus Curiae Of Pacific Legal Foundation, Center For Equal Opportunity, Competitive Enterprise Institute, And The CATO... by Cato Institute on 12/29/2011 The federal Fair Housing Act makes it unlawful "[t]o refuse to sell or rent after the making of a bona fide offer ... or otherwise make unavailable or deny, a dwelling to any person because of race, color, religion, sex,...more
Update on Redevelopment Law: The Supreme Court Makes it Official - Redevelopment is Dead in California by Sheppard Mullin Richter & Hampton LLP on 12/29/2011 The California Supreme Court released its opinion today in California Redevelopment Association v. Matosantos, challenging the Legislature's adoption of AB 1X 26, providing for elimination of California redevelopment agencies...more
Sauce For the Goose? Home Builders Lose a Standing Battle by Foley Hoag LLP - Environmental Law on 12/11/2011 Developers have cheered in recent years as the Supreme Court has tightened its standing rules. In a decision issued on Friday in National Association of Home Builders v. EPA, the Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia...more