Intellectual Property Electronic Discovery

Read Intellectual Property Law updates, alerts, news, and legal analysis from leading lawyers and law firms:
News & Analysis as of

Recommind Challenges CAL Patent: eDiscovery Trends

How do you like them apples? After they were the subject of much scrutiny five years ago regarding their attempt to trademark “predictive coding” (only to eventually abandon it), Recommind (now OpenText after they were...more

Defendants Are Awarded Additional Costs For Depositions And E-Discovery

Robinson, J. Defendants’ motion to review taxation of costs is granted in part and denied in part. Delaware Local Rule 54.1 provides guidance as to how the court generally exercises it discretion to award costs. The...more

[Event] Continuing Legal Education and Chicago Cubs Rooftop Event - August 11th, Chicago, Illinois

Join Freeborn & Peters LLP for an afternoon of Continuing Legal Education classes followed by an evening of baseball hosted by the firm's Litigation Practice Group....more

An Investigative Piece on Clawback Agreements

Who: Clawback agreement; alias: Rule 502 Agreement. What: A mechanism to take back inadvertently disclosed privileged and/or confidential information and protect against an argument that you waived privilege....more

I’ve Made a Huge Mistake: Intentional Destruction of ESI is No Illusion

In season three of the series Arrested Development, episode 11 finds George Bluth, Sr. unsurprisingly using a giant electromagnet in an attempt to delete electronic computer files, which could potentially indict him for...more

District Court Refuses to Recognize "Apex" Doctrine for Documents Created by Inventor and Global Leader of Company

The defendant filed a motion to compel, seeking a wide array of discovery against Plaintiffs Dyson, Inc. and Dyson Limited (collectively, "Plaintiffs") to produce emails belonging to James Dyson ("Dyson"). Plaintiffs asserted...more

Current Issues in U.S. Litigation Discussed at Korean CLE Seminar

On April 15, 2016, a select group of Korean patent and intellectual property attorneys convened at the Ritz Carlton Hotel in Seoul for a continuing legal education seminar entitled “Current Issues in U.S. Litigation.” The...more

Court Compels Production of Database for Forensic Metadata Analysis (Utah)

Thorne Research v. Atlantic Pro-Nutrients, 2016 WL 1122863 (D. Utah Mar. 22, 2016) - In this patent infringement suit, the defendant filed a motion to compel, seeking a copy of a database that the plaintiffs’ inventor...more

Court Denies Motion for a Negative Inference Based upon Plaintiff’s Alleged Deletion of Emails

In one of the first cases applying the 2016 amendments to the federal discovery rules, on March 11, 2016, Judge Pratter of the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania issued a Memorandum Opinion...more

What’s Trending in eDiscovery

The first quarter of 2016 has been a busy one for courts adjudicating matters relating to eDiscovery. Across the pond, the English High Court approved the use of technology-assisted review, while U.S. courts have been busy...more

Defendants’ Proposal to Redact Irrelevant Information Upheld under Newly Amended Rule 26 Florida

In re Takata Airbag Prods. Liab. Litig., MDL No. 2599 (S.D. Fla. Mar. 1, 2016) - In this products liability case, a Special Master approved the defendants’ proposal to withhold or redact irrelevant parent documents from...more

Amended Rule 26: Protecting Against Competitively Sensitive Disclosures

Hundreds of billions of business e-mails are sent per day. That number may not come as a shock to many, but once a company is involved in litigation, e-discovery can be quite burdensome. Even the mention of the phrase...more

Federal Court Offers Clues in How the Newly Amended Rule 37(e) Will Be Applied When Electronically Stored Information Is Not...

Among the most significant changes to the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure that went into effect in December 2015 were amendments to Rule 37(e), which defines spoliation in the context of electronically stored information...more

The Problem with Backup Tapes: District Court Orders Retention of Old Backup Tapes for Ongoing Litigation

In this patent infringement action pending in a multi-district litigation, one of the defendants moved the district court for an order allowing the defendant to destroy old backup tapes. Defendant ICM, Inc. ("ICM") moved for...more

Top Considerations When Building BYOD Policies

In a recent article, my Kroll Ontrack colleague Vikas Pall wrote about the growing concerns over bring your own device (BYOD) policies. Today’s employees integrate their personal and professional lives, and the use of...more

Court Issues Sanctions for Manipulation of Email Evidence, Addresses New FRCP 37(e) (New York)

CAT3 v. Black Lineage, 2016 WL 154116 (S.D.N.Y. Jan. 12, 2016) - In this trademark infringement case, the plaintiff asserted rights to a domain name to sell its clothing products, in addition to an online website and...more

Court Denies Motion to Compel Under Newly Amended FRCP 26(b)(1) (California)

Gilead Sciences v. Merck, 2016 WL 146574 (N.D. Cal. Jan. 13, 2016) - In this patent infringement case, the defendant sought additional discovery on the contents of certain “tubes of compounds” that the plaintiff’s...more

How the Amended Federal Rules Will Change Patent Litigation

Significant amendments to the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure became effective on December 1, 2015 and include an important change to patent infringement pleading practice and the most notable revisions to the civil...more

A BETTER WAY TO LITIGATE? – The December 1, 2015 Amendments To The Federal Rules Of Civil Procedure Aim For More Efficiency And...

Civil litigation can sometimes be less than civil or efficient. Indeed, some parties have been found to engage in “abusive” discovery practices or dilatory tactics intended to prolong and increase the costs of litigation....more

CLIENT ALERT: Federal Rules of Civil Procedure Amendments to Take Effect December 1, 2015

On December 1, 2015, amendments to Rules 1, 4, 16, 26, 30, 31, 33, 34, 37, 55 and 84 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure will become effective. These amendments were originally approved by the Judicial Conference in...more

Reducing Your Company’s Exposure to Trade Secret Litigation when Key Employees Come and Go

THE NIGHTMARE SCENARIO - Within the span of two weeks, Mr. Smith and Mr. Wilson, two top managers from your $2 billion corporation, resign. Both managers had complete, unfettered access to your corporation’s trade...more

When E-Filing Goes Wrong: How to Protect Your Trade Secrets in the Event of Inadvertent Online Disclosure

It is frightening to think that valuable corporate trade secrets could be lost with the click of a mouse. But as electronic court filing becomes increasingly prevalent, the risk of inadvertent disclosure of sensitive...more

Court Orders Inclusion of Technology Specialist Fees in Award Calculation (New Mexico)

Gen. Protecht Grp., Inc. v. Leviton Mfg. Co., 2015 WL 4988635 (D.N.M. Aug. 3, 2015) - In this patent infringement case, the defendant alleged that the plaintiffs had infringed upon the defendant’s specialized patents,...more

International News: Focus on Private Equity

Our Focus on Private Equity provides a global perspective on some of the challenges being faced by PE firms and how these can be successfully addressed. It also examines some of the many opportunities available, e.g., by...more

Five Drivers of E-Discovery in the APAC Region

In last week’s blog, we discussed developing trends in e-discovery law in the Asia-Pacific region. This week, we explore five trends that will continue to spur the growth of e-discovery in this region over the next few years....more

205 Results
View per page
Page: of 9

Follow Intellectual Property Updates on:

JD Supra Readers' Choice 2016 Awards

"My best business intelligence, in one easy email…"

Your first step to building a free, personalized, morning email brief covering pertinent authors and topics on JD Supra:

Sign up to create your digest using LinkedIn*

*By using the service, you signify your acceptance of JD Supra's Privacy Policy.

Already signed up? Log in here

*With LinkedIn, you don't need to create a separate login to manage your free JD Supra account, and we can make suggestions based on your needs and interests. We will not post anything on LinkedIn in your name. Or, sign up using your email address.