News & Analysis as of

Bad Faith PA Supreme Court

Marshall Dennehey

Pa. Supreme Court Evaluates Constitutional Parameters of a Jury’s Punitive Damage Award

Marshall Dennehey on

While it is well known that an insured has a clear and convincing standard of proving bad faith in order to recover such damages, it is lesser recognized that an insured does not have to prove outrageous conduct or evil...more

Dechert LLP

Non-Debtor Awarded Sanctions for an Improper Filing of an Involuntary Petition

Dechert LLP on

Section 303(i) of the Bankruptcy Code authorizes the court to award the debtor sanctions on account of an improper filing of an involuntary petition against it. But can a non-debtor third-party obtain such a relief? Yes, says...more

Saul Ewing LLP

Pennsylvania Supreme Court Split Ends 24-Year Insurance Bad Faith Battle

Saul Ewing LLP on

On August 25, 2020, the Pennsylvania Supreme Court split 3-3, with one Justice recused, on an appeal from a trial court’s insurance bad faith decision imposing $18 million in punitive damages and $3 million in attorney’s fees...more

White and Williams LLP

The Complex Insurance Coverage Reporter – A Year in Review

White and Williams LLP on

Welcome to CICR’s annual review of insurance cases. Here, we spotlight five (actually, seven) decisions from the last year that you should know about, and five pending cases—all before state high courts—to keep an eye on. The...more

McNees Wallace & Nurick LLC

Rancosky: The (Clarified) Insurance Bad Faith Standard

How does an insured prove that an insurer acted in bad faith? Although the issue has been well settled since the Superior Court decided Terletsky v. Prudential Property & Casualty Insurance Co. in 1994, there has been much...more

Carlton Fields

Pennsylvania Supreme Court Clarifies Showing Required For Bad Faith Insurance Claims

Carlton Fields on

The Pennsylvania Supreme Court has, for the first time in the 37-year history of Pennsylvania’s bad faith insurance statute, 42 Pa.C.S. § 8371, considered the necessary elements of such a claim, and it has determined that...more

Zelle  LLP

In the End, Pa. Supreme Court Only Clarifies Bad Faith Law

Zelle LLP on

In its recent decision in Rancosky v. Washington National Insurance Company, the Pennsylvania Supreme Court examined, for the first time, Pennsylvania’s standard for insurance bad faith. The court held that, while an...more

Butler Weihmuller Katz Craig LLP

Pennsylvania's Highest Court Clarifies The Elements Of A Statutory Bad Faith Cause Of Action

For the first time, the Pennsylvania Supreme Court, the highest court in the state, enunciated the elements of a bad faith insurance claim brought pursuant to Pennsylvania’s bad faith statute, 42 Pa.C.S. § 8371. The decision...more

Cozen O'Connor

PA Supreme Court Addresses Level of Proof Required Under Statutory Bad Faith Claim

Cozen O'Connor on

In an opinion dated September 28, 2017, the Pennsylvania Supreme Court, Western District, considered as an issue of first impression the level of proof required to prevail in a bad faith claim, examining the elements of a bad...more

Saul Ewing LLP

PA Supreme Court: Malice Not A Prerequisite to Bad Faith

Saul Ewing LLP on

In a much anticipated decision, the Pennsylvania Supreme Court cemented and clarified the test for bad faith set out in the 1994 Superior Court decision Terletsky v. Prudential—that an insurer’s bad faith is established by...more

Saul Ewing LLP

PA Supreme Court Ruling Makes it Easier for Insured to Prove Insurance Bad Faith

Saul Ewing LLP on

Policyholders asserting an insurance bad faith claim need not show a dishonest purpose or motive of self-interest or ill will to prove their claim against insurers under Pennsylvania’s insurance bad faith statute, 42 Pa....more

Tucker Arensberg, P.C.

Procurement Code Attorney Fee Award

Tucker Arensberg, P.C. on

Scott Enterprises, Inc. v. City of Allentown, 142 A.3d 779 (Pa. 2016) — Pennsylvania Supreme Court held that a jury finding of bad faith does not mandate a trial court to award penalties and attorney fees under the...more

Troutman Pepper

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania Holds That Under Prompt Payment Act, Imposition of Penalty and Attorneys’ Fees Is Discretionary, Not...

Troutman Pepper on

Scott Enters., Inc. v. City of Allentown, 2016 Pa. LEXIS 1503 (Pa. July 19, 2016) - The Supreme Court of Pennsylvania reversed an order of the Commonwealth Court and held that the prompt payment provisions of the...more

Pullman & Comley, LLC

Cancel My Reservation! Pennsylvania Sows Confusion Over Consent-to-Settle Clauses

Pullman & Comley, LLC on

This summer, the Supreme Court of Pennsylvania addressed an important question that has divided other courts: if an insurer defends a claim subject to a reservation of rights, may the insured settle the claim without the...more

Saul Ewing LLP

Bad Faith Sentinel - September 2015

Saul Ewing LLP on

Kennedy v. Allstate, No. 15-2221 (E.D. Pa. July 8, 2015). District Court recognizes possibility that insurance adjusters owe a duty of care to insureds that would be breached by failing to conduct a reasonable...more

Saul Ewing LLP

Bad Faith Sentinel - July 2015

Saul Ewing LLP on

Eighth Circuit: No Bad Faith Where Insured Failed to Make a Sufficient Demand and Insurer Refused to Entertain Settlement Offer Prior to Completing Investigation - Purscell v. Tico Ins. Co., No. 13-2362, 2015 WL 3855253...more

16 Results
 / 
View per page
Page: of 1

"My best business intelligence, in one easy email…"

Your first step to building a free, personalized, morning email brief covering pertinent authors and topics on JD Supra:
*By using the service, you signify your acceptance of JD Supra's Privacy Policy.
- hide
- hide