News & Analysis as of

Mandatory Arbitration Clauses Preliminary Injunctions

ArentFox Schiff

Ninth Circuit’s Reversal Allows Mandatory Employment Arbitration Agreements in California

ArentFox Schiff on

In another reversal of course, the US Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals cleared the way again for California employers to require arbitration agreements. The latest 2-1 decision in Chamber of Commerce v. Bonta, issued on...more

ArentFox Schiff

Change of Mind: Ninth Circuit Will Review California Law Prohibiting Mandatory Employment Arbitration Agreements

ArentFox Schiff on

A Ninth Circuit panel that previously upheld a California law prohibiting mandatory employment arbitration agreements in the workplace withdrew its decision and ordered the matter to be resubmitted for a panel rehearing. ...more

Ogletree, Deakins, Nash, Smoak & Stewart,...

Ninth Circuit Panel to Reconsider Decision Upholding California Mandatory Arbitration Ban

​​​​​​​The panel of the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals that largely upheld California’s law banning mandatory arbitration agreements in the employment context just withdrew its decision. On August 22, 2022, two of the three...more

Ervin Cohen & Jessup LLP

Mandatory Arbitration Agreements in California: Down, But Possibly Not Out

Ervin Cohen & Jessup LLP on

Businesses and attorneys alike have kept a close eye on the developments surrounding the challenge to California Assembly Bill 51 (now codified as Labor Code section 432.6). Most recently, in a 2-1 decision, the 9th Circuit...more

ArentFox Schiff

Ninth Circuit Upholds Portions of California Law Prohibiting the Use of Mandatory Employment Arbitration Agreements

ArentFox Schiff on

The Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals has vacated a preliminary injunction issued in January 2020 that prohibited California from enforcing Assembly Bill 51 (“AB 51”), which barred employers from requiring employees to sign...more

Fisher Phillips

The Arbitration Whipsaw Continues – Court Reinstates Portions of California Prohibition of Mandatory Arbitration Agreements

Fisher Phillips on

- The Ninth Circuit rules that portions of Assembly Bill 51 are not preempted by the Federal Arbitration Act (“FAA”) and lifts a lower court’s injunction that barred the law from taking effect. - The court did rule that...more

Manatt, Phelps & Phillips, LLP

California Court Keeps AB 51 on Hold

The Chamber of Commerce and employer organizations convinced a federal court judge in California to halt enforcement of Assembly Bill 51, which was set to take effect January 1, 2020, and invalidate all agreements requiring...more

MoFo Employment Law Commentary (ELC)

Federal Court Preliminarily Enjoins the Attorney General from Enforcing AB 51, the New California Law Barring Mandatory Employment...

A federal district court found that the new California law barring mandatory employment arbitration agreements is preempted by the Federal Arbitration Act (FAA). The court granted the challengers’ motion for preliminary...more

Davis Wright Tremaine LLP

Preliminary Injunction Blocks California Ban on Arbitration Agreements Covered by Federal Arbitration Act

On February 7, 2020, United States District Court Judge Kimberly J. Mueller issued a decision explaining her prior order blocking enforcement of California's new law restricting arbitration agreements, AB 51. ...more

Seyfarth Shaw LLP

AB 51: Preliminary Injunction GRANTED

Seyfarth Shaw LLP on

Seyfarth Synopsis: Among other things, AB 51 makes it unlawful for employers to impose arbitration agreements on employees as a condition of employment, even if employees are permitted to opt out. AB 51 was quickly challenged...more

Weintraub Tobin

Federal Court Explains Order Barring California From Enforcing New Anti-Employment-Arbitration Law

Weintraub Tobin on

A federal court in Sacramento explained last week its rationale for temporarily barring the State of California from enforcing a new law, AB 51, that would curtail employment arbitration agreements. The rationale set forth in...more

Epstein Becker & Green

California Federal Court Issues Detailed Decision Explaining Its Preliminary Injunction to Block Anti-Arbitration Law

Epstein Becker & Green on

As we wrote here, United States District Court Judge Kimberly J. Mueller of the Eastern District of California wrote a brief “minute order” explaining that she was issuing a preliminary injunction to halt enforcement of...more

Littler

California Court Concludes that Anti-Arbitration Law is Likely Preempted

Littler on

On February 7, 2020, the U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of California issued an order supporting its injunction of Assembly Bill 51 (AB 51), an expansive anti-arbitration law enacted in October, which was...more

Vedder Price

Federal Court Preliminary Enjoins Enforcement of New California Arbitration Law AB 51

Vedder Price on

On Friday, January 31, 2020, Chief District Judge Kimberly J. Mueller of the federal District Court for the Eastern District of California issued a Preliminary Injunction (PI) against the State of California, enjoining the...more

Orrick - Employment Law and Litigation

AB 51 Update: Preliminary Injunction Granted

On Friday January 31, 2020, Judge Kimberly Mueller of the Eastern District of California granted a preliminary injunction blocking the enforcement of California Assembly Bill 51 (AB 51) to the extent it applies to arbitration...more

Payne & Fears

Federal Judge Issues Preliminary Injunction Blocking State's Enforcement of New Law Banning Mandatory Employee Arbitration...

Payne & Fears on

On January 31, 2020, Judge Kimberly Mueller issued a preliminary injunction "in full" preventing the State of California from enforcing AB 51, the state's new law effectively banning mandatory employee arbitration...more

Fox Rothschild LLP

Court Grants Injunction To Stop AB 51 — Mandatory Arbitration Still OK In CA

Fox Rothschild LLP on

Here is the latest in a series of blogs about AB 51, the California bill that threatened mandatory arbitration. Thankfully, the District Court granted the preliminary injunction in full (not just temporarily), and stopped AB...more

Seyfarth Shaw LLP

AB 51 Challenge: Preliminary Injunction Issued

Seyfarth Shaw LLP on

Seyfarth Synopsis: After granting a temporary restraining order days before AB 51 was to go into effect, the Eastern District of California granted a motion for a preliminary injunction on January 31, 2020. An order detailing...more

Ervin Cohen & Jessup LLP

Breaking News: Federal Court Grants Preliminary Injunction To Block AB 51 Employment Arbitration Law

U.S. District Court Judge Kimberly Mueller just granted a preliminary injunction to block Assembly Bill 51 throughout future court proceedings, which will examine the enforceability of the new law.  This is welcome news for...more

Fisher Phillips

Federal Court Preserves Use Of Mandatory Arbitration Agreements In California

Fisher Phillips on

A federal judge just extended the reprieve that permitted California employers to escape the grasp of a newly enacted law that aimed to prevent them from utilizing mandatory arbitration agreements with their employees. After...more

Greenberg Glusker LLP

Breaking News! New Court Order Bans the Ban on Mandatory Employment Arbitration Agreements

Greenberg Glusker LLP on

AB 51 is the California Bill which attempts to ban certain mandatory employment arbitration agreements. It was scheduled to take effect on January 1, 2020, but was temporarily enjoined on December 30, 2019, after a coalition...more

Stokes Wagner

AB 51 Remains on Pause as the District Court Requests Further Briefing

Stokes Wagner on

The temporary restraining order (“TRO”) which prevents the enforcement of AB 51 remains in effect until January 31, 2020. As a reminder, California’s AB 51 bars mandatory arbitration agreements in employment agreements....more

Ogletree, Deakins, Nash, Smoak & Stewart,...

AB 51 Update: Court Continues TRO on California’s Arbitration Statute

Assembly Bill (AB) 51, which attempts to ban certain mandatory arbitration agreements, was scheduled to go into effect on January 1, 2020. However, a coalition of business organizations filed a suit on December 9, 2019...more

Mintz - Employment Viewpoints

California’s Ban on Mandatory Employment Arbitration Stayed for Now

California AB 51’s ban on mandatory employment arbitration remains stayed for now. AB 51 was passed in fall 2019 and essentially prohibits employers from requiring an applicant or employee to consent to mandatory arbitration...more

FordHarrison

A (Temporary) Reprieve for Mandatory Workplace Arbitration

FordHarrison on

On December 30, 2019, a federal judge in the Eastern District of California entered an order temporarily halting the enforcement of AB 51, California’s new anti-mandatory arbitration law. AB 51, which was set to go into...more

34 Results
 / 
View per page
Page: of 2

"My best business intelligence, in one easy email…"

Your first step to building a free, personalized, morning email brief covering pertinent authors and topics on JD Supra:
*By using the service, you signify your acceptance of JD Supra's Privacy Policy.
- hide
- hide