News & Analysis as of

Negligence › Employer Liability Issues › Harassment

Mintz - Employment, Labor & Benefits...

First Circuit Court of Appeals Holds That Employer Can be Found Liable Under Quid Pro Quo Sexual Harassment Negligence Theory for...

Mintz - Employment, Labor & Benefits... on

In a case of first impression, the First Circuit Court of Appeals recently held that an employer can be held liable under Title VII for quid pro quo sexual harassment based on the discriminatory actions of a non-supervisory...more

Nexsen Pruet, PLLC

Employment Law Update - Danger Ahead: Employer Liability For Third-Party Harassment

Nexsen Pruet, PLLC on

On April 29, 2014, the Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals held that employers can be liable for third-party harassment under a negligence standard. In doing so, the court joined other circuits in establishing that employers can...more

Smith Anderson

eTrends – Fourth Circuit Adopts Negligence Standard for Third-Party Harassment Claims

Smith Anderson on

When is an employer liable for workplace harassment of its employees by a customer, vendor or other third-party? In Freeman v. Dal-Tile Corp., decided on April 29, 2014, the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth...more

Sherman & Howard L.L.C.

HR as Caesar’s Wife

Sherman & Howard L.L.C. on

An employee rejects a co-worker’s proposal of a physical relationship. The co-worker gets him fired. Is the employer liable for sex discrimination? This is different from earlier cat’s paw cases because the person who caused...more

McAfee & Taft

Harassment-free workplace: Potential harassers not limited to employees

McAfee & Taft on

Employers are well aware of their obligation to act promptly to stop harassment or discriminatory behavior in the workplace when it is committed by employees. But this obligation can be more extensive. Employers are required...more

Fisher Phillips

Failure Is Not An Option

Fisher Phillips on

When it comes to a dealership’s legal liability for employment-related problems, the basis of the liability generally falls into two categories – actions the dealership took and those it failed to take. When it comes to big...more

Akerman LLP - HR Defense

Supreme Court Affirms Narrow Definition Of Supervisor Under Title VII

Akerman LLP - HR Defense on

The Supreme Court has ruled in Vance v. Ball State University that the authority to take tangible employment actions is the defining characteristic of a supervisor, and that without such authority an employee is not a...more

7 Results
 / 
View per page
Page: of 1

"My best business intelligence, in one easy email…"

Your first step to building a free, personalized, morning email brief covering pertinent authors and topics on JD Supra:
Sign up Log in
*By using the service, you signify your acceptance of JD Supra's Privacy Policy.
- hide
- hide