News & Analysis as of

Pharmacies Supreme Court of the United States

Spilman Thomas & Battle, PLLC

The Health Record - Healthcare Law Insights, Issue 4, August 2024

Welcome to our fourth issue of The Health Record - our healthcare law insights e-newsletter. In this edition, we address a variety of topics including a recent SCOTUS ruling and the potential impact on CMS, issues of patient...more

McDermott Will & Emery

This Week in 340B: November 2023 #2

McDermott Will & Emery on

This weekly series provides brief summaries to help you stay in the know on how 340B cases are developing across the country. Each week we comb through the dockets of more than 50 340B cases to provide you with a quick...more

Epstein Becker & Green

State Regulation of Pharmacy Benefit Managers: Tenth Circuit Holds That ERISA and Medicare Part D Preempt Key Parts of Oklahoma...

Epstein Becker & Green on

On August 15, 2023, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit (the “Tenth Circuit”) issued its decision in Pharmaceutical Care Management Association (PCMA) v. Mulready, one of the first major opinions to further define...more

Epstein Becker & Green

SuperValu’s Effect on the FCA Scienter Standard and Impact to Future Litigation

Epstein Becker & Green on

n June 1, 2023, the U.S. Supreme Court unanimously settled a long-standing dispute over a subjective versus objective standard for scienter under the False Claims Act (FCA), holding that a defendant’s own subjective belief is...more

Manatt, Phelps & Phillips, LLP

5th Circuit Rejects FDA Actions Expanding Access to Medication Abortion; Supreme Court Review Likely

On Wednesday, August 16, the Fifth Circuit Court of Appeals issued a ruling upholding parts of a Texas district court’s decision that would, if it becomes effective, severely limit access to mifepristone, one of two pills...more

Dorsey & Whitney LLP

Supreme Court’s Recent Decision on FCA’s Scienter Standard Potentially Raises Threshold for Government to Establish “Reckless...

Dorsey & Whitney LLP on

On June 1, 2023, a unanimous Supreme Court decision sought to clarify the meaning of “scienter” in the FCA context, which deals with the defendant’s knowledge (or lack thereof) that a claim for payment was false and intent to...more

Cozen O'Connor

Supreme Court Confirms: Subjective Beliefs of Falsity are Fair Game in FCA Lawsuits

Cozen O'Connor on

On June 1, 2023, the Supreme Court unanimously held in two consolidated landmark cases, U.S. ex rel. Proctor v. Safeway Inc. and U.S. ex rel. Schutte et al. v. SuperValu Inc., that a defendant’s subjective beliefs must be...more

Dickinson Wright

False Claims Act “Knowledge” Is a Subjective Standard

Dickinson Wright on

The Federal False Claims Act (“FCA”) allows private parties to bring lawsuits in the name of the federal government against defendants who allegedly “knowingly” present a false claim to the government for payment. The...more

Dickinson Wright

Supreme Court Issues Ruling on the Requisite Intent for False Claims Act Defendants

Dickinson Wright on

A recent decision by the Supreme Court clarified the required intent for a defendant to be held liable under the False Claims Act. According to the Court, the FCA’s scienter requirement refers to a defendant’s knowledge and...more

Burr & Forman

Do I Believe You? Scienter Standard in a FCA Case

Burr & Forman on

Two False Claims Act (“FCA”) cases have recently been decided by the United State Supreme Court, further clarifying one aspect of the FCA. In the recent decisions in U.S. ex rel Proctor v. Safeway, Inc. and U.S. ex rel....more

BCLP

U.S. Supreme Court Explains Meaning of “knowingly” Under the False Claims Act

BCLP on

In its recent unanimous and significant decision in the consolidated cases of United States ex rel. Schutte v. SuperValu, No. 21-1326 (6-1-23), and United States ex rel. Proctol v. Safeway, Inc., No. 22-111 (6-1-23), the...more

Locke Lord LLP

Grappling With Increased Insurance ‎Regulatory Scrutiny of Pharmacy Benefit Managers

Locke Lord LLP on

Insurance regulators and examiners (“Insurance Regulators”) are increasing their efforts to scrutinize pharmacy benefit managers (“PBMs”), including conducting examinations of their business operations and initiating...more

Jackson Lewis P.C.

U.S. Supreme Court: False Claims Act Liability Depends on Defendant’s Subjective Beliefs

Jackson Lewis P.C. on

Liability in False Claims Act (FCA) suits depends on whether a defendant subjectively believed its claims were false, not on whether it can offer an objectively reasonable basis for its claims, the U.S. Supreme Court has held...more

Polsinelli

SCOTUS Rejects Defense-Friendly Scienter Standard In Schutte Opinion

Polsinelli on

On June 1, 2023, the Supreme Court of the United States (SCOTUS) issued its much-anticipated opinion in United States ex rel. Schutte v. SuperValu Inc. and United States ex rel. Proctor v. Safeway, Inc. (Schutte), holding...more

Fox Rothschild LLP

Supreme Court Rejects “Objectively Reasonable” Defense to False Claims Act

Fox Rothschild LLP on

The Supreme Court’s recent decision in United States ex rel. Schutte v. SuperValu, Inc. clarified that the claimant’s knowledge and subjective beliefs, and not what an objectively reasonable person may have known or believed...more

Bradley Arant Boult Cummings LLP

SuperValu: Supreme Court Clarifies FCA’s State-of-Mind Requirement

On June 1, 2023, in U.S. ex rel. Schutte v. SuperValu Inc., the Supreme Court clarified the state-of-mind (or “scienter”) standard under the False Claims Act (FCA), holding that a defendant’s subjective belief that a claim...more

Ballard Spahr LLP

Supreme Court’s SuperValu Decision: a Game-Changer for Assessing FCA Violations

Ballard Spahr LLP on

Summary - On June 1, 2023, the Supreme Court issued a landmark decision in False Claims Act cases. In United States ex rel. Schutte v. SuperValu Inc., it unanimously held that liability under the False Claims Act depends...more

ArentFox Schiff

Investigations Newsletter: Recent Filings Shed Light on DOJ’s View of Supreme Court’s Recent FCA Ruling

ArentFox Schiff on

Recent Filings Shed Light on DOJ’s View of Supreme Court’s Recent FCA Ruling - On June 1, 2023, the US Supreme Court explained that an assessment of a defendant’s subjective beliefs — rather than what an objectively...more

Mintz - Health Care Viewpoints

The Supreme Court’s SuperValu Decision on the “Knowingly” Element in the False Claims Act: Protecting Against Liability When There...

In a resounding unanimous 9-0 decision, the Supreme Court rejected the argument that a defendant’s subjective belief is irrelevant under the False Claims Act (FCA) when evaluating whether a defendant “knowingly” submitted a...more

McDermott Will & Emery

SuperValu: It’s Not Super Bad! A Practical Look at the Supreme Court’s Recent FCA Scienter Ruling

McDermott Will & Emery on

Two separate lawsuits alleging False Claims Act (FCA) violations by retail drug pharmacies made their way to the Supreme Court of the United States this term. The lawsuits decided whether the pharmacies could defeat these...more

Skadden, Arps, Slate, Meagher & Flom LLP

Supreme Court Clarifies False Claims Act Scienter Element in Schutte

On June 1, 2023, the U.S. Supreme Court issued its highly anticipated decision in the consolidated cases United States ex rel. Schutte v. SuperValu Inc. and United States ex rel. Proctor v. Safeway, Inc., Nos. 21-1326 &...more

K&L Gates LLP

Supreme Court Issues Decision Regarding False Claims Act's Scienter Element

K&L Gates LLP on

The United States Supreme Court recently held that a defendant’s subjective belief is always relevant to the False Claims Act’s scienter element, regardless of what an objectively reasonable person may have believed. This...more

Wilson Sonsini Goodrich & Rosati

U.S. Supreme Court Closes Door on Objective Reasonableness Defense in Healthcare False Claims Act Cases

Leaves Window Open for Defense Based on Subjective Belief - On June 1, 2023, the U.S. Supreme Court issued a decision in a consolidated appeal of two healthcare qui tam cases that removes a very powerful defense from...more

Brownstein Hyatt Farber Schreck

U.S. Supreme Court Clarifies False Claims Act Scienter Requirement

On June 1, 2023, in United States ex rel. Schutte v. SuperValu, Inc., the U.S. Supreme Court unanimously held that the scienter requirement of a claim brought under the False Claims Act (FCA) is evaluated based on the...more

McCarter & English Blog: Government Contracts...

The False Claims Act’s Fuzzy Scienter Element Brought into Sharp Focus

Parties litigating False Claims Act (FCA) cases have long struggled with a thorny question around the essential element of scienter (the defendant’s intent, or state of mind): What/how much does a contractor need to know when...more

92 Results
 / 
View per page
Page: of 4

"My best business intelligence, in one easy email…"

Your first step to building a free, personalized, morning email brief covering pertinent authors and topics on JD Supra:
*By using the service, you signify your acceptance of JD Supra's Privacy Policy.
- hide
- hide