News & Analysis as of

Removal Federal Jurisdiction

Benesch

Ninth Circuit Shuts Down “Super” Snap Removals, Leaves Question of “Non-Super” Snap Removals (AKA Pre-Service Removals) Open for...

Benesch on

Many defendants prefer federal court to state court. Accordingly, when sued in state court, they will remove whenever possible.  This bulletin addresses a wrinkle in the law about when removal is possible....more

McGuireWoods LLP

Eighth Circuit Confirms That No Anti-Removal Presumption Applies under CAFA

McGuireWoods LLP on

The Eighth Circuit recently held that a district court “applied the wrong legal standard” when it remanded a case after removal under the Class Action Fairness Act (“CAFA”). In Leflar v. Target Corp., the district court held...more

Downey Brand LLP

Ruling may give oil companies upper hand in climate change cases

Downey Brand LLP on

On May 17, the U.S. Supreme Court issued a 7-1 decision in BP P.L.C. v. Mayor and City Council of Baltimore, 2021 DJDAR 4717, that may give fossil fuel companies the upper hand in the slew of recent climate change cases filed...more

Bennett Jones LLP

Win for American Energy Companies Facing Climate Change Litigation

Bennett Jones LLP on

In a 7-1 ruling in BP PLC et al v Mayor and City Council of Baltimore (19-1189), the Supreme Court of the United States ruled that the Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals did not fully analyze whether a climate change tort...more

Cozen O'Connor

Supreme Court Sides With Energy Companies On Technical Grounds In Climate Liability Case

Cozen O'Connor on

The U.S. Supreme Court issued a 7-1 opinion in BP PLC v. Mayor and City Council of Baltimore, Case No. 19-1189, ruling that the Fourth Circuit erred in failing to consider all jurisdictional arguments from defendants BP and...more

Morgan Lewis

US Supreme Court Allows Oil and Gas Companies to Appeal Jurisdictional Issues in Baltimore Climate Suit

Morgan Lewis on

In a decision with important implications for climate change tort cases, the US Supreme Court held that federal courts of appeal can consider all potential grounds for federal jurisdiction in certain appeals of district court...more

Jones Day

U.S. Supreme Court Delivers Procedural Win to Corporate Defendants in Climate Change Litigation

Jones Day on

The U.S. Supreme Court held that the Fourth Circuit erred in its review of a remand order that would have kept Baltimore's climate change suit in state court. On May 17, 2021, in Mayor and City Council of Baltimore v. BP...more

Faegre Drinker Biddle & Reath LLP

Supreme Court Decides BP P.L.C., et al. v. Mayor and City Council of Baltimore

On May 17, 2021, the Supreme Court held in BP P.L.C., et al. v. Mayor and City Council of Baltimore that when a remand order is appealable under 28 U.S.C. § 1447(d), the court of appeals may review the entire remand order,...more

Zelle  LLP

Climate Change Litigation Goes Before the Supreme Court

Zelle LLP on

In January, the US Supreme Court will hear arguments in one of the lawsuits filed against oil and gas companies for their alleged contribution to climate change. The Court’s ruling will likely have a significant impact on how...more

Jones Day

From the Top in Brief - June 2020

Jones Day on

The U.S. Supreme Court recently handed down three rulings potentially impacting bankruptcy cases. Nunc Pro Tunc Relief - In Roman Catholic Archdiocese of San Juan v. Acevedo Feliciano, No. 18-921, 2020 WL 871715 (U.S....more

Greenberg Glusker LLP

Nunc Pro Tunc Anyone?

Greenberg Glusker LLP on

On February 24, 2020, the United States Supreme Court ruled in a case Roman Catholic Archdiocese of San Juan v. Feliciano in connection with removal of a state court matter to Federal court, something that may have a...more

Burr & Forman

Did the Supreme Court Really Ban Nunc Pro Tunc Orders?

Burr & Forman on

The U.S. Supreme Court in Roman Catholic Archdiocese of San Juan, Puerto Rico v. Acevedo Feliciano, No. 18-921, 2020 WL 871715, at * (U.S. Feb. 24, 2020) in a per curiam opinion that turned on a state court’s jurisdiction...more

Carlton Fields

A Dart Across the Bow

Carlton Fields on

The Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals recently underscored that removal practice under the Class Action Fairness Act (CAFA) differs in some important respects from traditional removal practice in non-CAFA cases. It did so...more

Womble Bond Dickinson

Tracking the Trend: Court Holds Defendants Not Required to Allege Plaintiff’s Article III Standing in Removing TCPA Case From...

Womble Bond Dickinson on

We’re closely tracking the recent trend involving plaintiffs’ use of their lack of Article III standing as a basis to avoid federal jurisdiction. Last week we reported on a case in the Northern District of California that was...more

Payne & Fears

Key California Employment Law Cases: April 2018

Payne & Fears on

This month’s key California employment law cases are two decisions from the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals. Chavez v. JPMorgan Chase & Co., 888 F.3d 413 (9th Cir. 2018) - Summary: Amount in controversy for federal...more

Foley & Lardner LLP

Seventh Circuit Considers Diversity Jurisdiction in Trust Dispute

Foley & Lardner LLP on

In Doermer v. Oxford Fin’l Group, Ltd., No. 17-1659 (7th Cir. Mar. 7, 2018), the Seventh Circuit had before it an example of what Chief Judge Diane Wood called a “depressingly common” type of litigation: “[f]amily disputes...more

BakerHostetler

A Look at Potential Supreme Court Nominees’ Class Action Decisions

BakerHostetler on

Tonight, President Donald Trump is expected to nominate one of three federal appellate judges to the Supreme Court: Judge William Pryor of the Eleventh Circuit, Judge Neil Gorsuch of the Tenth Circuit or Judge Thomas Hardiman...more

Burr & Forman

Who Decides Whether Bankruptcy Jurisdiction Exists after Removal from State Court?

Burr & Forman on

Imagine that while a bankruptcy case is pending, the debtor-in-possession or bankruptcy trustee files a state law claim against one of the estate’s creditors. Presumably, if the debtor wins its state law claim, that recovery...more

Goodwin

Supreme Court Clarifies When State Law Claims Are Removable Under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934

Goodwin on

On May 16, 2016, the U.S. Supreme Court issued its decision in Merrill Lynch, Pierce, Fenner & Smith Inc. v. Manning, 578 U.S. __ (May 16, 2016), which resolved a longstanding circuit split as to the scope of exclusive...more

Pierce Atwood LLP

Pazol v. Tough Mudder, Inc.: Muddying the waters on proof of jurisdictional facts under CAFA?

Pierce Atwood LLP on

The Class Action Fairness Act of 2005 (CAFA) was intended to make it easier for defendants to remove class action lawsuits from state court to federal court. For example, CAFA introduced the concept of minimal as opposed to...more

Seyfarth Shaw LLP

Texas Federal Court Rules “Anti-Competitive” Employment Covenants Do Not Raise Federal Antitrust Question

Seyfarth Shaw LLP on

In a case solely comprised of state-law claims to enforce employment covenants, a United States District Judge in the North District of Texas ruled last week in Leica Microsystems Inc. v. Hernandez et al., No. 3:15-CV-2531-D,...more

McDermott Will & Emery

Preemption Challenge to State Demand-Letter Regulations Confers Jurisdiction Under Post-AIA 35 U.S.C. § 1295(a)(1) - Vermont v....

McDermott Will & Emery on

Addressing jurisdictional issues, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit relied on post-AIA 35 U.S.C. § 1295(a)(1) to exercise, for the first time, jurisdiction over an appeal in which only a counterclaim arose...more

Cozen O'Connor

When Plaintiffs Fail to Plead the “Local Controversy” Exception to CAFA

Cozen O'Connor on

A narrow exception to CAFA’s broad removal provisions is the “local controversy” exception, which prohibits removal in certain cases where the dispute is deemed sufficiently contained within the forum state that the interests...more

Foley & Lardner LLP

Seventh Circuit: "Frivolous" Argument Saves Jurisdiction

Foley & Lardner LLP on

The Seventh Circuit issued an important opinion by Judge Easterbrook today, Lu Junhong v. Boeing Co., No. 14-1825, a clump of cases that arose after an Asiana Airlines jet manufactured by Boeing struck a seawall while landing...more

Hinshaw & Culbertson LLP

Do Medical Records Support Removal And Do Unripe Claims Get Dismissed

In Alilin v. State Farm Mut. Auto. Ins. Co., No. 6:14-cv-1183-Orl-41DAB (D. for M.D. Fla., Jan. 30, 2015), Judge Carlos Mendoza denied Alilin's challenge to the amount in controversy prong of State Farm's removal to federal...more

47 Results
 / 
View per page
Page: of 2

"My best business intelligence, in one easy email…"

Your first step to building a free, personalized, morning email brief covering pertinent authors and topics on JD Supra:
*By using the service, you signify your acceptance of JD Supra's Privacy Policy.
- hide
- hide