Rescission

News & Analysis as of

Ceding Reinsurer’s Disclosure Deficiencies Insufficient To Support Retrocessionaire’s Rescission Claim

A federal district court recently made findings of fact and conclusions of law following a nine-day bench trial upholding a ceding reinsurer’s right to receive certain payments from a retrocessionaire under two retrocession...more

Eleventh Circuit Holds Certain Improper Disclosures Do Not Trigger TILA Rescission

On January 14, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit affirmed dismissal of a suit seeking rescission of a mortgage loan based on the lender’s alleged failure to disclose the “real lender” and improper disclosure...more

The US tax rescission doctrine: when the parties want an agreement to disappear

The old saw about the best-laid plans of mice and men also goes for international tax planning and transactions with significant tax consequences. Sometimes the business and/or financial assumptions around the planning...more

Utah Federal Court Rules on “Clear and Conspicuous” Requirement under the Truth-in-Lending Act

The United States District Court for the District of Utah partially granted summary judgment for borrowers alleging that their mortgage lender violated the Truth in Lending Act, and its implementing regulation, Regulation Z. ...more

Utah Federal Court Holds Model TILA Rescission Notice Not “Clear And Conspicuous”

On January 6, the U.S. District Court for the District of Utah held that the model TILA rescission disclosure, form H-8, does not clearly and conspicuously disclose the three business day rescission period. Simmons v....more

Court Of Appeal Says Legislature Was “willing to tolerate some dead cats to keep management honest.”

Chapter 13 of the California General Corporation Law establishes the rights of “dissenting shareholders” (defined in Section 1300(c)) to demand payment of cash for their shares in reorganizations and short-form merger...more

The GPMemorandum, Issue 174

In This Issue: - Court Approves Settlement In Class Action Lawsuit Filed Against Franchisor: A class action settlement has been approved in Swift v. DirectBuy, Inc., 2013 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 152618 (N.D. Ind. Oct....more

Insurance Recovery Law -- Dec 11, 2013

FEMA Clarifies Time Extension for Victims of Sandy - Why it matters: Given the unprecedented meteorological event known colloquially as “Superstorm Sandy,” the Federal Emergency Management Agency granted multiple...more

Florida Court Allows Rescission of a Professional Liability Policy

In its recent decision in Zurich American Ins. Co. v. Diamond Title of Sarasota, Inc., 2013 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 170981 (M.D. Fla. Dec. 4, 2013), the United States District Court for the Middle District of Florida had occasion to...more

New York State Court Dismisses Rescission Claim in RMBS Putback Case

On November 21, Justice Shirley Werner Kornreich of the Supreme Court of the State of New York granted in part defendant DB Structured Products, Inc.’s (DB) motion to dismiss the complaint of ACE Securities Trust 2007-HE1....more

Temporary Insurance Applications and Agreements: The Impact of Material Misrepresentations in Life Insurance Applications on...

Earlier this year, the Fourth Circuit upheld a decision of the U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, Banner Life Ins. Co. v. Noel, No. 12-1329, 2013 WL 221650 (4th Cir. Jan. 22, 2013), holding that a...more

Ninth Circuit Upholds Rescission of Life Insurance Policy and Rejects Novel Theories

This week the Ninth Circuit affirmed a grant of summary judgment in favor of USAA Life Insurance Company, holding that the insurer was entitled to rescind the policy under California law when it discovered that its insured...more

Borrower Must File Suit before Foreclosure To Exercise Rescission Rights, Eighth Circuit Holds

The Eighth Circuit recently held that a borrower must file suit before foreclosure to exercise rescission rights under TILA. The court now joins the Ninth and Tenth Circuits in holding that notice alone is not sufficient. In...more

Fannie Mae Announces Requirements For Foreclosure Sale Eliminations And Rescissions

On September 18, Fannie Mae issued Servicing Guide Announcement SVC-2013-19, which establishes requirements for eliminations and rescissions of foreclosure sales, effective immediately. The announcement states that when a...more

Dodd-Frank News: September 2013: Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform And Consumer Protection Act Update

In This Issue: - Recent Cases ..CFPB Involvement in Litigation ..Say-On-Pay Voting ..Constitutional Challenges to Dodd-Frank ..TILA Rescission ..Dodd-Frank Amendment to the Securities and...more

Real Property, Financial Services & Title Insurance Case Law Update: Weeks Ending August 30 & September 6, 2013

I. FLORIDA STATE CASES - ILAN NIEUCHOWICZ & SASHA FUNK GRANAI - Hearsay/Business Records Exception: court erred in considering testimony given by Association’s new management company concerning amounts owed to...more

Eighth Circuit Reaffirms that Notice Alone is Insufficient to Effectuate TILA Rescission

The United States Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit affirmed a lower court’s opinion rejecting plaintiffs’ attempt to rescind a loan agreement after the loan had already been foreclosed, ruling that the foreclosure...more

CUNA Mutual Group Sues To Rescind RMBS Purchases

On August 16, several affiliates of CUNA Mutual Group (CUNA) filed six separate lawsuits in the United States District Court for the Western District of Wisconsin, seeking to rescind their purchases of RMBS from six different...more

Eighth Circuit Extends Recent TILA Rescission Holding

On August 19, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit held that borrowers facing foreclosure were required to file suit prior to the foreclosure sale to complete the exercise of their right to rescind under TILA....more

Eighth Circuit TILA rescission decision rejects CFPB position

The Eighth Circuit has now joined the Tenth Circuit in ruling that notice alone within the three-year period is insufficient to validly exercise a right to rescind....more

Eighth Circuit Holds Borrowers Must File Suit Within TILA Three-Year Rescission Period

On July 12, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit held that a borrower seeking rescission under TILA must file suit within three years, and that merely providing the lender notice is insufficient to preserve the...more

First Circuit Permits Insurer to Retain Policy Premiums Despite Rescission

Courts often require insurers to return premiums (or at least offer to return them) when rescinding an insurance policy. Some states may even require it under statute. The reason is that rescission is an equitable remedy...more

Court Adheres to Specific Definition of “Designated Premises”; Holds Policy Cancellation Does Not Preclude Rescission

In Seneca Ins. Co. v. Cimran Co., — N.Y.S.2d –, 2013 WL 1405231 (App. Div. 1st Dep’t 2013), the New York appeals court granted the insurer’s motion for summary judgment, declaring that it had no duty to defend and indemnify...more

Closing Protection Letters: Overlooked Indemnity Coverage For Common Foreclosure Defense Claims

Mortgage lenders are all too familiar with borrowers’ assertions that they did not receive two properly dated copies of the Truth-In-Lending Act (“TILA”) mandated Notice of Right to Cancel form (“NORTC”) at closing. Under...more

Seventh Circuit Decision in Koransky Bouwer Enforces Professional Liability Reporting Requirements

Earlier this month, the 7th Circuit affirmed a district court order that held an insurer properly denied coverage to the insured law firm based on its failure to comply with the reporting requirements under its claims-made...more

42 Results
|
View per page
Page: of 2