News & Analysis as of

Supreme Court of the United States › Department of Homeland Security (DHS)

The United States Supreme Court is the highest court of the United States and is charged with interpreting federal law, including the United States Constitution. The Court's docket is largely discretionary... more +
The United States Supreme Court is the highest court of the United States and is charged with interpreting federal law, including the United States Constitution. The Court's docket is largely discretionary with only a limited number of cases granted review each term.  The Court is comprised of one chief justice and eight associate justices, who are nominated by the President and confirmed by the Senate to hold lifetime positions. less -
Akin Gump Strauss Hauer & Feld LLP

Autonomous Akin Update - July 2024

Akin Gump Strauss Hauer & Feld LLP on

Our newsletter reflects the focus of Akin’s cross-practice autonomous systems and advanced mobility team on developments in the regulatory, policy, trade, intellectual property, and cybersecurity and privacy spaces....more

Epstein Becker & Green

Not the Day We Are Waiting For - SCOTUS Today

Epstein Becker & Green on

With a significant mass of cases left to decide and only a few weeks to issue the opinions, the U.S. Supreme Court has reduced the backlog by four yesterday. None of them, however, resolves the future of Chevron deference or...more

Dorsey & Whitney LLP

The Supreme Court Update - April 29, 2024

Dorsey & Whitney LLP on

Today, the Supreme Court of the United States granted certiorari in four cases: Medical Marijuana, Inc. v. Horn, No. 23-365: This case involves interpretation of the Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organizations Act...more

Fisher Phillips

SCOTUS Predictions: Blockbuster Decision Will Dismantle Workplace Regulations

Fisher Phillips on

The Supreme Court is set to shake up the workplace world by taking away a great deal of power from federal agencies – including the regulators who oversee many of the nation’s labor and employment laws. That’s according to...more

Fisher Phillips

Workplace Law Forecast 2024 - Your workplace law recap for 2023 and predictions for 2024 to help you prepare for the coming year.

Fisher Phillips on

When I reflect on the relationship that our firm has with our clients, I’m most proud of the fact that you can always count on us. That often means defending complex litigation, steering you through regulatory threats,...more

Jackson Lewis P.C.

States Lack Standing to Sue Over Immigration-Enforcement Guidelines, U.S. Supreme Court Rules

Jackson Lewis P.C. on

Texas did not have standing to challenge the Biden Administration’s policy priorities regarding removal of noncitizens, the U.S. Supreme Court has ruled. United States v. Texas, No. 22-58 (June 23, 2023)....more

PilieroMazza PLLC

Weekly Update for Government Contractors and Commercial Businesses – June 2023 #5

PilieroMazza PLLC on

GOVERNMENT CONTRACTS - GAO Sustains Rare Bid Protest Challenging Agency’s Corrective Action - In February 2023, the Department of Energy (DOE) agreed to take corrective action following three bid protests filed at the...more

Faegre Drinker Biddle & Reath LLP

Supreme Court Decides United States v. Texas

Faegre Drinker Biddle & Reath LLP on

On June 23, 2023, the U.S. Supreme Court decided United States v. Texas, No. 22-58, holding that Texas and Louisiana did not have standing to challenge guidelines for the enforcement of certain immigration laws promulgated by...more

ArentFox Schiff

Key Supreme Court Cases to Watch in Administrative and Environmental Law

ArentFox Schiff on

The first Monday of October means the Supreme Court begins to hear cases for the new term. As we promised at the end of last term, below we summarize cases the Court could address, including issues involving the federal Clean...more

Amundsen Davis LLC

Dobbs, Trigger Laws and Injunctions: The Changing Landscape of Reproductive Health Care for Providers

Amundsen Davis LLC on

Since the Supreme Court decision in Dobbs v. Jackson Women’s Health Organization, in which the Court determined that the authority to regulate abortion rests with the political branches, i.e. legislatures, and not the courts,...more

ArentFox Schiff

Five Administrative Law Takeaways From Recent Supreme Court Decisions

ArentFox Schiff on

The US Supreme Court’s decisions of late have been consequential. While headline-grabbing decisions deal with religious liberties, privacy, and gun control, the Court’s impact on administrative law will have major...more

Dorsey & Whitney LLP

The Supreme Court - June 30, 2022

Dorsey & Whitney LLP on

West Virginia v. EPA, No. 20-1530 (and consolidated cases): This case concerns the scope of the Environmental Protection Agency’s (EPA) authority to impose carbon dioxide emission standards under Section 111(d) of the Clean...more

Faegre Drinker Biddle & Reath LLP

Supreme Court Decides Biden v. Texas

Faegre Drinker Biddle & Reath LLP on

On June 30, 2022, the U.S. Supreme Court decided Biden v. Texas, No. 21-954. The Court held that the Immigration and Nationality Act (INA) does not prohibit the Biden administration’s Department of Homeland Security (DHS)...more

Dorsey & Whitney LLP

The Supreme Court - June 24, 2022

Dorsey & Whitney LLP on

Dobbs v. Jackson Women’s Health Organization, No. 19-1392: The Supreme Court held that the U.S. “Constitution does not confer a right to abortion,” overruled its prior decisions in Roe v. Wade and Casey, and returned “the...more

Faegre Drinker Biddle & Reath LLP

Supreme Court Decides Patel v. Garland

Faegre Drinker Biddle & Reath LLP on

On May 16, 2022, the U.S. Supreme Court decided Patel v. Garland, No. 20-979, holding that federal courts lack jurisdiction to review an immigration judge’s findings of fact pertaining to a removable immigrant’s petition for...more

Dorsey & Whitney LLP

The Supreme Court - February 18, 2022

Dorsey & Whitney LLP on

Biden v. Texas, No. 21-954: This case concerns the Migrant Protection Protocols (MPP) - also known as the “Remain in Mexico” policy - a former policy of the Department of Homeland Security (DHS) under which certain...more

Clark Hill PLC

Window on Washington – Vol. 6, Issue 6

Clark Hill PLC on

The Senate is in session this week, and the House has a committee work period. The Senate plans to vote on nominee confirmations, on U.S. Postal Service reform legislation, and on the House-passed continuing resolution (CR)...more

ArentFox Schiff

DOJ's New Civil Cyber-Fraud Initiative and How a Pending Case Could Test Its Efficacy

ArentFox Schiff on

The Department of Justice recently announced a new initiative that aims to hold government contractors accountable when they fail to meet required cybersecurity standards. In announcing the “Civil Cyber-Fraud Initiative” in...more

Constangy, Brooks, Smith & Prophete, LLP

DACA Struck Down By Federal Judge, Approval Of New Applications Enjoined

Constangy, Brooks, Smith & Prophete, LLP on

On July 16, a federal judge in Texas vacated the Deferred Action for Childhood Arrivals program. Judge Andrew Hanen ruled that the DACA was unlawfully created by the Executive Branch in violation of the Administrative...more

Jackson Lewis P.C.

Judge Again Finds DACA Program Illegal, Blocks New Applications, Allows Renewals

Jackson Lewis P.C. on

The Deferred Action for Childhood Arrival program (DACA) is not legal, U.S. District Court Judge Andrew Hanen has ruled in State of Texas et al. v. U.S. et al. Judge Hanen issued an injunction preventing the Department...more

Dorsey & Whitney LLP

The Supreme Court - June 29, 2021

Dorsey & Whitney LLP on

Minerva Surgical, Inc. v. Hologic, Inc., No. 20-440: In the late 1990s, Csaba Truckai invented and patented a device to treat abnormal uterine bleeding. Truckai assigned his interest to his company, Novacept, which in turn...more

Faegre Drinker Biddle & Reath LLP

Supreme Court Decides Johnson v. Guzman Chavez

Faegre Drinker Biddle & Reath LLP on

On June 29, 2021, the U.S. Supreme Court decided Johnson v. Guzman Chavez, holding that the detention of a noncitizen ordered removed from the United States who reenters without authorization is governed by 8 U.S.C. § 1231....more

Epstein Becker & Green

June 2021 Immigration Alert

Epstein Becker & Green on

Flexibility to Verify Forms I-9 Is Extended to August 31 Due to COVID-19 - Due to the COVID-19 pandemic, the Department of Homeland Security (“DHS”) has announced another extension of its policy allowing special...more

Constangy, Brooks, Smith & Prophete, LLP

Farewell To The 2019 Public Charge Rule And Form I-944!

Constangy, Brooks, Smith & Prophete, LLP on

For the last year, the fate of the Public Charge Rule, which expanded the ability of the U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services to deny green cards to lower-income foreign nationals, has been uncertain. In addition to the...more

Harris Beach PLLC

USCIS Stops Enforcing Charge Rule: Intending Immigrants No Longer Need to Pass Wealth Test

Harris Beach PLLC on

On March 9, 2021, the Department of Homeland Security (DHS) announced that it will no longer seek judicial review of any court decisions invalidating the 2019 Public Charge Final Rule, noting: Today, DHS Secretary...more

96 Results
 / 
View per page
Page: of 4
Next »

"My best business intelligence, in one easy email…"

Your first step to building a free, personalized, morning email brief covering pertinent authors and topics on JD Supra:
Sign up Log in
*By using the service, you signify your acceptance of JD Supra's Privacy Policy.
- hide
- hide