Latest Publications

Share:

Federal Court Strikes Down NLRB’s New Joint Employer Rule, Leaving 2020 Rule in Place for Now

On March 8, 2024, a federal district court in Texas vacated the National Labor Relations Board’s 2023 joint employer rule. The 2023 rule, which was set to take effect on March 11, would have expanded the joint employer test...more

DOL Proposes New Rule Clarifying the Test for Classification of Workers

On September 22, 2020, the U.S. Department of Labor (DOL) issued a new proposed rule that would substantially simplify the test for determining whether persons are employees or independent contractors under the Fair Labor...more

Ninth Circuit Rules Amazon Drivers Fall Within FAA’s Transportation Worker Exemption

On August 19, the Ninth Circuit delivered the latest guidance in the long-running debate over the Federal Arbitration Act’s (FAA) scope. It held that Amazon delivery drivers can move forward with a nationwide class action —...more

Families First Coronavirus Response Act FAQ (Updated)

Updated as of April 8, 2020 - The Families First Coronavirus Response Act (FFCRA) was signed into law on March 18, 2020, and took effect on April 1, 2020. The FFCRA provides temporary relief to eligible employees affected...more

Labor and Employment Issues in the CARES Act

On March 27, 2020 the House passed the Coronavirus Aid, Relief and Economic Security Act (CARES Act) – the largest stimulus package in U.S. history – in response to the economic crisis caused by the coronavirus pandemic. The...more

Congress Nears Passage of $2 Trillion COVID-19 Relief Package

Following days of protracted negotiations, Congress is heading toward enacting a $2 trillion measure to respond to the coronavirus pandemic. Anticipated to clear the House of Representatives on Friday and be promptly signed...more

Families First Coronavirus Response Act FAQ

The Families First Coronavirus Response Act (FFCRA) was signed into law on March 18, 2020, and will go into effect on or before April 2, 2020. The FFCRA creates obligations for many employers to provide temporary relief to...more

In Dispute Over Timecard Rounding, California Court of Appeals Issues ‘Balanced’ Ruling

Timecard rounding is a tricky area of employment law. Employers like rounding because it streamlines timekeeping and payroll; employees like it because it gives them the chance to get paid for time they did not actually work...more

9th Circuit Puts Brakes on Joint Employment Claims

Companies doing business in California and elsewhere scored a victory yesterday in one of the fastest growing areas in employment law: joint employment claims. In a significant opinion, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the 9th...more

Supreme Court Upholds FLSA Collective Action Waivers in Arbitration Agreements

On May 21, 2018, the U.S. Supreme Court held that employees can waive their right to participate in a collective action under the Fair Labor Standards Act (FLSA). This is a major victory for employers seeking to limit...more

California Supreme Court Adopts "ABC" Test for Independent Contractor Status Under California Wage Orders

The California Supreme Court issued its long-awaited opinion in Dynamex Operations West v. Superior Court, in which the court considered the appropriate test to use when determining whether a worker is an employee or...more

Supreme Court Grants Second Review of FLSA Overtime Exemption for Auto Service Advisors

On September 28, 2017, the Supreme Court announced it will consider for a second time whether service advisors in automobile dealerships are exempt from overtime compensation under the Fair Labor Standards Act (FLSA)....more

Second Circuit Holds Individualized Damages, Standing Alone, Do Not Preclude Class Certification

Two years ago, in Comcast v. Behrend et.al, the Supreme Court caught the attention of employers facing class action lawsuits by holding that plaintiffs cannot “show Rule 23(b)(3) predominance” when “[q]uestions of individual...more

NLRB Office of General Counsel Alleges Franchisor Is Liable for Claims of Its Franchisees' Employees

On December 19, 2014, the National Labor Relations Board's (NLRB) Office of General Counsel took another step forward in its effort to erase the line between franchisors and franchisees. In a controversial move, the Office of...more

Landmark Ruling: Franchisor Not Liable Absent Employment Related Control

On August 28, 2014, the California Supreme Court issued a landmark ruling in favor of Domino's Pizza and all business format franchisors that do business in California. In Patterson v. Domino's Pizza, LLC, ---P.3d---, 2014 WL...more

NLRB Office of General Counsel: Franchisors May Be Liable for Franchisees' Employment Practices

In a decision with potentially far-reaching consequences for the franchise industry, the National Labor Relations Board's (NLRB) Office of General Counsel decided on July 29, 2014, that it will require McDonald's USA, LLC...more

Unanimous Supreme Court Rebukes President Obama for Unconstitutional NLRB Recess Appointments

On June 26, 2014, the United States Supreme Court handed down its Noel Canning decision, unanimously finding that President Obama's January 4, 2012, appointments of Sharon Block, Richard Griffin and Terence Flynn to the...more

17 Results
 / 
View per page
Page: of 1

"My best business intelligence, in one easy email…"

Your first step to building a free, personalized, morning email brief covering pertinent authors and topics on JD Supra:
*By using the service, you signify your acceptance of JD Supra's Privacy Policy.
- hide
- hide