Latest Publications

Share:

New Title IX Regulations Halted in Additional States and at Hundreds of Institutions as Department of Education Continues to...

With the August 1, 2024, effective date of the Department of Education’s April Title IX regulations (Final Rule) just weeks away, court action in pending lawsuits challenging the Final Rule across the country continues. The...more

Title IX Regulations Enjoined in Four More States as Department of Education Appeals Earlier Injunctions

On July 2, Judge John Broomes of the U.S. District Court for the District of Kansas handed down yet another preliminary injunction blocking the Title IX regulations issued in April, following on the heels of similar orders...more

Title IX Regulations Enjoined in Six More States

On June 17, Chief Judge Danny Reeves of the Eastern District of Kentucky issued a preliminary injunction staying the effective date, and enjoining enforcement, of the new Title IX regulations in the states of Indiana,...more

Title IX Regulations Enjoined in Four States: What Do You Need to Know?

On June 13, a judge in the Western District of Louisiana issued a preliminary injunction enjoining the enforcement of the new Title IX regulations in full in the states of Louisiana, Mississippi, Montana and Idaho. The...more

Supreme Court Ends Use of Race as a Factor in College Admissions

In a much-anticipated decision, the Supreme Court last week ended the use of race as a factor in college admissions, effectively overturning its precedent in Grutter v. Bollinger. In a vote of 6-3, the Court held that the...more

College Athletics: Three Things for Campus Counsel to Keep an Eye On

Athletics on campus are currently in full swing. Football continues toward its various bowls and championships, while men’s and women’s basketball competitions have just begun, not to mention the many other fall and winter...more

Takeaways and Predictions from Oral Argument in UNC and Harvard Cases at the Supreme Court

On October 31, the Supreme Court heard the much-anticipated oral arguments in the cases brought by Students for Fair Admissions (SFFA) against Harvard University and the University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill (UNC),...more

District Court Enjoins EEOC and Department of Education Guidance Protecting LGBTQ Rights

On July 15, the U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Tennessee entered a preliminary injunction barring the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (EEOC) and the Department of Education (ED) from enforcing...more

Supreme Court Grants Review in Race-Conscious Admissions Cases

On January 24, the Supreme Court granted certiorari in two closely-watched cases raising the issue of the constitutionality of the use of race in college admissions. The Court has consolidated the cases brought by Students...more

OSTP Issues Guidance to Agencies to Implement NSPM 33—Key Takeaways for Institutions Conducting Federally-Funded Research

On January 4, the White House Office of Science and Technology Policy (OSTP) issued guidance for federal agencies to implement National Security Presidential Memorandum 33 (NSPM 33). NSPM 33 was issued in January 2021 at the...more

United States Urges Supreme Court to Decline Review of Harvard Case

On December 8, the Solicitor General filed a brief stating the views of the United States on the pending petition for certiorari in the case challenging the admissions program of Harvard University. The petition, filed by...more

Supreme Court Hears Oral Argument: Are Allegations of Excessive Retirement Plan Fees Sufficient to State a Claim under ERISA?

On December 6, the U.S. Supreme Court heard oral argument in the case of Hughes v. Northwestern University. The question at issue is whether allegations that a defined-contribution retirement plan paid fees that substantially...more

Case Challenging Race-Conscious Admissions at the University of Texas is Dismissed

On July 26, the U.S. District Court for the Western District of Texas dismissed the latest case filed by Students for Fair Admissions (SFFA) against the University of Texas at Austin, challenging the university’s use of race...more

Second Circuit Affirms Convictions in College Basketball Bribery Scandal

On June 4, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit issued a decision upholding the bribery convictions of two defendants in the college basketball scandal that garnered a significant amount of media attention in...more

Payment for Student-Athletes’ NIL Rights Comes to Tennessee

On May 11, Tennessee Governor Bill Lee signed into law House Bill 1351 (HB 1351), which requires public and private four-year colleges in Tennessee that are not under the authority of the Tennessee Board of Regents...more

HHS Reverses Trump Administration Restrictions on Fetal Tissue Research

On April 16, 2021, the Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) rescinded actions taken during the Trump administration regarding extramural research funded by the National Institutes of Health (NIH) involving human...more

Implications of Possible NCAA v. Alston Decision: Is Pay for Play Inevitable?

On March 31, the Supreme Court heard oral argument in NCAA v. Alston, the closely-watched case that will determine whether certain NCAA rules, limiting compensation provided by colleges and universities to student-athletes,...more

NIH Begins Implementation of OSTP Foreign Influence Recommendations for Research Institutions

As part of the government’s broader efforts to combat foreign threats to U.S.-funded scientific research, the National Institutes of Health (NIH) and White House Office of Science and Technology Policy (OSTP) have announced...more

Department of Education Provides Timeline for Guidance on Title IX: What Can Institutions Expect to Come Next?

On April 6, the Department of Education Office for Civil Rights (OCR) sent a letter to stakeholders indicating how it intends to provide guidance on the implementation of Title IX of the Education Amendments of 1972 (Title...more

Supreme Court Hears Oral Argument in "Pay for Play" Case: NCAA v. Alston

On March 31, the Supreme Court heard oral argument in the closely watched case of NCAA v. Alston, the so-called “pay for play” case. The Supreme Court’s ruling in this case could have important ramifications not only for...more

Students May Unionize After All: NLRB Withdraws Proposed Rule

The National Labor Relations Board (NLRB or Board) recently announced it was changing course on whether students should be considered employees and therefore can unionize. This change of course returns to previous Board...more

Supreme Court Decides Uzuegbunam v. Preczewski: A Request for Nominal Damages is All You Need

On March 8, the United States Supreme Court issued its opinion in Uzuegbunam v. Preczewski, holding that a claim for nominal damages saves a claim from dismissal on mootness grounds. For more background on the case, see the...more

A Shadow of Things to Come: DOJ Filings in Affirmative Action and Title IX Cases

On February 3, the United States Department of Justice (DOJ) took steps in two separate cases to execute on expected changes in policy promised by the Biden Administration in the areas of affirmative action and Title IX. It...more

Supreme Court Hears Oral Argument: Do Nominal Damages Requests Save a Case from Mootness?

On January 12, the United States Supreme Court heard oral argument in the case of Uzuegbunam v. Preczewski, which occurred in the context of religious speech on a college campus. The question at issue in the case is whether a...more

Harvard's Affirmative Action Plan Upheld by First Circuit: Victory Now But What Will Come Next?

On November 12, the United States Court of Appeals for the First Circuit upheld the use of race by Harvard College in its student admissions program against a challenge brought by Students for Fair Admissions (SFFA), a group...more

39 Results
 / 
View per page
Page: of 2

"My best business intelligence, in one easy email…"

Your first step to building a free, personalized, morning email brief covering pertinent authors and topics on JD Supra:
*By using the service, you signify your acceptance of JD Supra's Privacy Policy.
- hide
- hide