News & Analysis as of

Arbitration Supreme Court of the United States Reversal

Arbitration is a widely-used method for settling disputes between parties. During arbitration, parties submit their dispute to an impartial third person or party, usually chosen by the parties. Typically, parties... more +
Arbitration is a widely-used method for settling disputes between parties. During arbitration, parties submit their dispute to an impartial third person or party, usually chosen by the parties. Typically, parties to arbitration agree in advance to be bound by the arbitrator's decision. Arbitration is an alternative to litigation, but it shares many of the familiar features of litigation. Namely, parties to arbitration hold hearings before neutral decision-makers, present evidence and argue the merits of their position. Parties often choose arbitration due to its perceived advantages over litigation. Those perceived advantages include greater efficiency and flexibility, and lower costs. less -
Holland & Knight LLP

U.S. Supreme Court: Workers Who Transport Goods Are Exempt from FAA, Regardless of Industry

Holland & Knight LLP on

The U.S. Supreme Court on April 12, 2024, decided Bissonnette v. LePage Bakeries Park St., LLC. The central issue revolved around the Federal Arbitration Act (FAA) and its applicability to workers engaged in interstate...more

Perkins Coie

Supreme Court Holds That Prejudice Is Not Part of an Arbitration Waiver Analysis Under the FAA

Perkins Coie on

The U.S. Supreme Court, in a May 23 decision, ruled that the federal policy favoring arbitration does not authorize federal courts to impose a prejudice requirement when evaluating whether a party has waived its right to...more

Burr & Forman

SCOTUS: Waiver of Arbitration Does Not Require Prejudice

Burr & Forman on

A unanimous Supreme Court held May 23 that a party’s waiver of its arbitration right does not require showing prejudice to an opposing party, because the Federal Arbitration Act (“FAA”) prohibits arbitration-specific rules....more

Foley & Lardner LLP

Sixth Circuit Refuses to Enforce Unilateral Changes to Arbitration Provision

Foley & Lardner LLP on

While the United States Supreme Court has made clear that class action waivers in arbitration clauses can be enforced, plaintiffs’ counsel continue to find creative ways to challenge these types of arbitration agreements....more

Mintz - Arbitration, Mediation, ADR...

Who Decides the “Class Arbitrability” Issue: Fifth Circuit Joins Consensus That It Is a Court, Not an Arbitrator, But Evidently...

Add the Fifth Circuit to the growing list of Federal Circuit Courts that have decided that “class arbitrability” is a gateway question for a court, rather than an arbitrator, to decide in the first instance, absent the...more

Moore & Van Allen PLLC

U.S. Supreme Court Said “No” to Class Arbitration in Employment-Related Data Breach Dispute Because Arbitration Agreement...

Moore & Van Allen PLLC on

The U.S. Supreme Court issued two 5-4 decisions in as many months regarding class procedures. Lamp Plus, Inc. v. Varela, 587 U. S. ____ (2019) was favorable to corporate defendants by limiting the availability of class...more

King & Spalding

Supreme Court Rules Class Arbitrations Must Be Explicitly Authorized

King & Spalding on

On April 24, 2019, in a 5-4 decision split along ideological lines, the Supreme Court held in Lamps Plus, Inc. v. Varela that class arbitration is not available where arbitration agreements are unclear about whether the...more

Partridge Snow & Hahn LLP

One Epic Year Later: Have You Implemented A Mandatory Arbitration Agreement Yet?

A year ago, the United States Supreme Court issued its seminal decision in Epic Systems v. Lewis, which confirmed that employers may use mandatory individual arbitration agreements without fear of the National Labor Relations...more

Ervin Cohen & Jessup LLP

Good News for Employers: Express Consent Required for Class Arbitration

Last year, the United States Supreme Court ruled that class action waivers in employment arbitration agreements are enforceable. But, the ruling did not address an agreement that is silent or ambiguous regarding the intent to...more

Vedder Price

Class-Wide Arbitration May Not Be Compelled in the Face of an “Ambiguous” Arbitration Agreement

Vedder Price on

In a case with important implications for employers, Lamps Plus, Inc. v. Varela, the United States Supreme Court held that class-wide arbitration may not be compelled pursuant to an arbitration agreement that is ambiguous as...more

Carlton Fields

Supreme Court’s Lamp Plus Brings Ambiguity in Classwide Arbitration to Light

Carlton Fields on

In 2016, a hacker tricked an employee of petitioner Lamps Plus Inc. into disclosing tax information of about 1,300 company employees. ...more

Parker Poe Adams & Bernstein LLP

U.S. Supreme Court Says Arbitration Agreements Exclude Class Arbitration Absent Consent

In last year’s Epic Systems decision, the U.S. Supreme Court held that the Federal Arbitration Act (FAA) allows mandatory arbitration agreements that preclude class or collective action claims. In other words, a party to the...more

Obermayer Rebmann Maxwell & Hippel LLP

Supreme Court Blocks Class-Wide Employment Arbitration Due to Vague Contract Language

Over the past several years, the U.S. Supreme Court has been expanding the enforceability of arbitration agreements and making it easier for employers to keep employment claims out of court. In its landmark Epic Systems...more

Vedder Price

SCOTUS Catapults Class Arbitration Onto the Endangered Species List

Vedder Price on

On April 24, 2019, the U.S. Supreme Court issued an important decision touching a number of hot button issues and litigation threats facing American businesses — including class actions, arbitration agreements and data...more

Sheppard Mullin Richter & Hampton LLP

U.S. Supreme Court Upholds Individualized Arbitration Where Agreement Is Ambiguous on Issue of Class Arbitration

In a 2010 decision, Stolt-Nielsen S. A. v. Animalfeeds International Corp., the United States Supreme Court held that parties may not be compelled to submit to class arbitration under the Federal Arbitration Act (FAA) unless...more

Eversheds Sutherland (US) LLP

Lights out for class arbitration – Lamps Plus holds that class arbitration cannot be read into ambiguous arbitration clauses

Consistent with prior US Supreme Court opinions, the Supreme Court held on April 24, 2019, that contractual ambiguity regarding class arbitration may not be construed against the drafter because of Federal Arbitration Act...more

Morgan Lewis

US Supreme Court Holds No Class Arbitration Absent Express Consent: Four Things to Know

Morgan Lewis on

The US Supreme Court’s recent decision in Lamps Plus means that parties with arbitration agreements governed by the Federal Arbitration Act may now compel arbitration without worrying that the court will order class...more

Akerman LLP - HR Defense

U.S. Supreme Court Rules that Ambiguous Arbitration Agreements Do Not Authorize Class Arbitration

Ambiguous language in an arbitration agreement is not a sufficient basis for concluding a party has agreed to class arbitration, the U.S. Supreme Court ruled last week....more

Bass, Berry & Sims PLC

Supreme Court Rules on Enforcement of Class Arbitration

Bass, Berry & Sims PLC on

The Supreme Court ruled on April 24, 2019 that an arbitration agreement which is ambiguous as to whether the parties had agreed to class arbitration was insufficient to require a party to participate in class arbitration. ...more

A&O Shearman

Supreme Court Holds That Parties Must Unambiguously Consent To Class Arbitration

A&O Shearman on

On April 24, 2019, the United States Supreme Court, in a 5-4 decision authored by Chief Justice Roberts, held that an agreement ambiguous as to whether arbitration had been agreed for class claims as well as individual claims...more

Cozen O'Connor

Supreme Court Finds Classwide Arbitration Available Only When Clearly Set Forth in Contract

Cozen O'Connor on

On April 24, 2019, the U.S. Supreme Court issued a decision in Lamps Plus v. Varela that should be of interest to the maritime industry. Even though our industry has long relied upon mandatory arbitration clauses in its...more

Miller Canfield

US Supreme Court Clarifies Language Triggering Class-wide Arbitration

Miller Canfield on

A majority of the U.S. Supreme Court held that the Federal Arbitration Act ("FAA") bars class arbitration actions when the agreement is ambiguous about the availability of such arbitration. The opinion strengthens protections...more

Morrison & Foerster LLP

Lamps Plus, Inc. v. Varela: The Supreme Court Clarifies that Clear Consent is Necessary for Class Arbitration

On April 24, 2019, the Supreme Court’s decision in Lamps Plus, Inc. v. Varela made it clear that an arbitration agreement must explicitly contemplate and provide for class arbitration, building on a line of pro-arbitration...more

Cozen O'Connor

SCOTUS: Ambiguous Agreement Insufficient to Compel Class Arbitration

Cozen O'Connor on

In a 5-4 decision, the U.S. Supreme Court decided on April 24, 2019, that an arbitration agreement in an employment contract that was ambiguous as to the availability of class arbitration could not serve as the basis for the...more

FordHarrison

Supreme Court Says: Express Language Required to Arbitrate on a Class Basis

FordHarrison on

Approximately one year ago, in Epic Systems Corp., the United States Supreme Court upheld the enforceability of mandatory arbitration agreements that prohibit employees from bringing employment claims on a class or collective...more

142 Results
 / 
View per page
Page: of 6

"My best business intelligence, in one easy email…"

Your first step to building a free, personalized, morning email brief covering pertinent authors and topics on JD Supra:
*By using the service, you signify your acceptance of JD Supra's Privacy Policy.
- hide
- hide