News & Analysis as of

Constitutional Challenges Injunctions

Morgan Lewis

Courts Invalidate President’s IEEPA Tariffs, But Stays Keep Duties on Imports—for Now

Morgan Lewis on

The US Court of International Trade and the US District Court for the District of Columbia have invalidated President Donald Trump’s actions imposing tariffs pursuant to the International Emergency Economic Powers Act of...more

Miller Nash LLP

Oregon Cannabis Employers No Longer Need to Comply with Measure 119 and Obtain Labor Peace Agreements

Miller Nash LLP on

On May 20, 2025, the U.S. District Court for Oregon permanently prohibited Oregon state officials from enforcing Measure 119. In 2024, Oregon voters approved Measure 119, which became effective on December 5, 2024. Measure...more

Jenner & Block

Client Alert: Tariffs Cancelled By Courts—Or Are They?

Jenner & Block on

Two courts this week invalidated the tariffs issued by the President under the International Emergency Economic Powers Act (IEEPA). First, late Wednesday night (May 28), the US Court of International Trade (CIT) in V.O.S. v....more

Torres Trade Law, PLLC

Court of International Trade Blocks Most Trump Tariffs

On May 28, 2025, a three-judge panel of the U.S. Court of International Trade (“CIT”) held that all Trump administration tariff actions based on the International Emergency Economic Powers Act (“IEEPA”) are unconstitutional....more

Cozen O'Connor

U.S. Court of International Trade Enjoins IEEPA Tariffs, But Federal Circuit Stays the Injunctions

Cozen O'Connor on

On May 28, 2025, the U.S. Court of International Trade (USCIT) issued a decision vacating and permanently enjoining many of the most economically significant tariff orders issued over the past four months by President Trump....more

McGuireWoods LLP

Federal Court Strikes Down Two Key Tariffs, Appeal Pending

McGuireWoods LLP on

On May 28, 2025, the U.S. Court of International Trade declared key tariffs implemented by the Trump administration under the International Emergency Economic Powers Act (IEEPA) unconstitutional. The ruling directly impacts...more

Dorsey & Whitney LLP

Federal Court Strikes Down Trump’s Border Emergency and Global Tariffs

Dorsey & Whitney LLP on

President Trump exceeded his emergency authority when he imposed tariffs on Canadian, Chinese, and Mexican origin goods citing border issues, and global reciprocal tariffs the U.S. Court of International Trade (“CIT”) said on...more

Pierce Atwood LLP

Federal Trade Court Rules Trump Lacks Authority for Tariffs Under IEEPA - D.C. District Court also finds tariffs unconstitutional...

Pierce Atwood LLP on

On May 29, 2025, in a fast-moving case involving President Trump’s authority to issue tariffs using the International Emergency Economic Powers Act (IEEPA), the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit temporarily stayed...more

BakerHostetler

Supreme Court to Decide the Fate of Universal Injunctions

BakerHostetler on

The Supreme Court is prepared to determine the legality of a powerful but controversial judicial remedy — the universal injunction. The case, Trump v. CASA, Inc., reached the Justices after a lower court barred the Trump...more

Warner Norcross + Judd

The U.S. Court of International Trade Stops Several IEEPA Tariffs

Warner Norcross + Judd on

On May 28, the U.S. Court of International Trade in a case challenging tariffs issued under the International Emergency Economic Powers Act of 1977 (IEEPA) filed by V.O.S. Selections, Inc. and other plaintiffs, and joined in...more

Fox Rothschild LLP

Court Strikes Down Trump's Emergency Tariffs, Immediately Halts Collections

Fox Rothschild LLP on

In a sweeping decision released May 28, 2025, a three-judge panel of the U.S. Court of International Trade (CIT) invalidated a broad set of tariffs imposed by President Trump earlier this year under the International...more

Stevens & Lee

Has Humphrey’s Executor Been Effectively Overruled on the Supreme Court’s Emergency Docket with Impact on the FTC?

Stevens & Lee on

The Supreme Court last week granted the stay requested by the Government enjoining the enforcement of the U.S. District Court for the District of Columbia’s orders involving President Trump’s firing of members of the National...more

Jackson Lewis P.C.

Federal Court Enjoins DHS’s Revocation of Harvard’s Ability to Enroll International Students

Jackson Lewis P.C. on

On May 22, 2025, Secretary of Homeland Security Kristi Noem ordered the Department of Homeland Security (“DHS”) to terminate Harvard University’s Student and Exchange Visitor Program (“SEVP”) certification for alleged...more

Cozen O'Connor

Democratic AGs Sue to Protect States’ Access to Federal EV Infrastructure Funds

Cozen O'Connor on

A group of 17 Democratic AGs has filed suit to block the U.S. Department of Transportation’s Federal Highway Administration from revoking or withholding funds allocated to states under the National Electric Vehicle...more

Mintz - Health Care Viewpoints

Twenty States Sue the Trump Administration for HHS Program Eliminations and Staff Layoffs

Nineteen states plus the District of Columbia filed a federal Complaint in U.S. District Court for the District of Rhode Island on May 5, 2025 alleging that the Trump Administration’s recent activities to downsize and...more

Bond Schoeneck & King PLLC

Supreme Court Chooses Not to Review Challenge to New York Gun Law

In April, the United States Supreme Court denied certiorari in Antonyuk v. James, a case challenging many of the restrictions imposed by New York’s Concealed Carry Improvement Act (CCIA). As a result, the Second Circuit’s...more

Farella Braun + Martel LLP

District Court Issues Permanent Injunction Enjoining Enforcement of Prop 65 Warning Requirements for Dietary Acrylamide

On May 2, 2025, the Eastern District of California found that Prop 65 warning requirements for dietary acrylamide violate the First Amendment, and granted a permanent injunction enjoining enforcement of those warnings....more

Skadden, Arps, Slate, Meagher & Flom LLP

Supreme Court Could Soon Rule on the Merits in Challenges to the Trump Administration - The Trump Administration’s First 100 Days

The U.S. Supreme Court has taken a cautious approach to the Trump administration’s wide-ranging actions....more

Saiber LLC

Arkansas “Social Media Safety Act” Ruled Unconstitutional

Saiber LLC on

On March 31, 2025, a judge of the United States District Court for the Western District of Arkansas, granted summary judgment for the plaintiff in NetChoice, LLC v. Griffin, a case in which NetChoice, an internet trade...more

Carlton Fields

Florida Appeals Court Decisions Week of April 14 - 18, 2025

Carlton Fields on

U.S. Eleventh Circuit Court of Appeals - Kinsale v. Pride of St Lucie - (Fla law) insurance, bad faith, duty to initiate settlement - Pipkins v. Hoover Ala - Fourth Amendment, deadly force - Vargas v. Lincare - False...more

Cozen O'Connor

Democratic AGs Support Law Firms Subject to Executive Orders

Cozen O'Connor on

A group of 21 Democratic AGs filed amicus briefs in two cases pending in the U.S. District Court for the District of Columbia in support of law firms challenging President Trump’s Executive Orders imposing sanctions against...more

Jackson Lewis P.C.

EEOC Is Permanently Enjoined From Enforcing Portions of PWFA Final Regulations and EEOC’s Title VII Guidance On Harassment in the...

Jackson Lewis P.C. on

On April 15, 2025, the United States District Court for the District of North Dakota issued its decision granting partial summary judgment to the Catholic Benefits Association, on behalf of its members and the Bismarck...more

Snell & Wilmer

Two More Tribes Enter Suit Over California Card Rooms’ Banked Games

Snell & Wilmer on

“Defendants [California card rooms] operate, participate in, and facilitate illegal gambling,” according to a complaint filed on April 1, 2025, by the Rincon Band of Luiseno Indians (the Rincon Band) and the Santa Ynez Band...more

Seyfarth Shaw LLP

Court Halts TPS Termination for Venezuelans: Relief (and Uncertainty) for Employers

Seyfarth Shaw LLP on

On March 31, 2025, Federal Judge Edward M. Chen of the Northern District of California issued a stay on the Trump administration’s revocation of Temporary Protected Status (TPS) for Venezuelans in the United States....more

Paul Hastings LLP

Illinois District Court Blocks Portions of Anti-DEI Executive Order

Paul Hastings LLP on

There are several concurrent challenges to President Donald Trump’s “Ending Illegal Discrimination and Restoring Merit-Based Opportunity” executive order (Anti-DEI EO). Previously, the U.S. District Court for the District of...more

88 Results
 / 
View per page
Page: of 4

"My best business intelligence, in one easy email…"

Your first step to building a free, personalized, morning email brief covering pertinent authors and topics on JD Supra:
*By using the service, you signify your acceptance of JD Supra's Privacy Policy.
- hide
- hide