News & Analysis as of

Depositions Corporate Executives

Perkins Coie

Washington Evaluates the Standard for Corporate Executive Depositions

Perkins Coie on

The Washington Supreme Court recently considered whether it would adopt the "apex doctrine." This doctrine is a framework used by some courts to evaluate whether a party may take the deposition of a company's executives and...more

Stoel Rives - Notice of Appeal

Washington Supreme Court Unanimously Rejects the Apex Doctrine

In Stratford v. Umpqua Bank, No. 100717-5 (Sept. 14, 2023) (slip op.), the Washington Supreme Court rejected the application of the “apex doctrine” in Washington. The apex doctrine has been adopted by some jurisdictions to...more

BCLP

Georgia Supreme Court Finds “Apex Doctrine” Factors Are Entitled to Consideration

BCLP on

The Supreme Court of Georgia recently issued a decision on whether the Apex Doctrine - a theory under which high-ranking corporate executives and government officials may not be compelled to sit for depositions if they lack...more

Esquire Deposition Solutions, LLC

Georgia Sets New Ground Rules for Deposing High-Level Executives

Much of the law is about balancing interests, and pretrial discovery is no exception. On the one hand, parties in litigation are entitled to discovery of any unprivileged information that could lead to admissible evidence at...more

Parker Poe Adams & Bernstein LLP

Georgia Supreme Court Rejects "Apex Doctrine"

On June 1, 2022, the Georgia Supreme Court issued a ruling that has the potential to significantly impact discovery in Georgia courts. In Gen. Motors, LLC v. Buchanan, No. S21G1147, 2022 WL 1750716 (Ga. June 1, 2022), the...more

Butler Snow LLP

The Apex Doctrine and the C-Suite Deponent

Butler Snow LLP on

The First Line of Defense Against Plaintiff Overreach - The suit has been filed, the troops have been marshaled, and written discovery is underway. What’s next are the inevitable requests for depositions of current and...more

Littler

Florida Adopts the Apex Doctrine in the Corporate Context

Littler on

Late last month, the Florida Supreme Court codified into Florida Rule of Civil Procedure 1.280(h) the “apex doctrine” and declared the doctrine applies with equal force to high-ranking corporate and government officials....more

Burr & Forman

Florida Supreme Court Adopts Apex Doctrine

Burr & Forman on

On August 26, 2021, the Florida Supreme Court amended the Florida Rules of Civil Procedure to adopt the so-called “apex doctrine” that protects high-level corporate officers from abusive discovery. ...more

Butler Snow LLP

Update – Rule 30(b)(6) Officially Amended with a Modified Meet and Confer Requirement, But Practical Challenges Remain

Butler Snow LLP on

Previously, I wrote about a proposed amendment to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 30(b)(6) that would create a meet and confer requirement among counsel concerning the topics for examining a corporate representative in a...more

Bradley Arant Boult Cummings LLP

You Don’t Get a Bite at the Big Dog: Texas Court Rules that Injured Worker Cannot Depose Company CEO

What if your employee plaintiff sues you and then demands to take the deposition of your company CEO or some other high-level corporate executive who has no personal knowledge about the facts of the case? No one would be...more

Butler Snow LLP

Apex Depositions

Butler Snow LLP on

It has become an increasingly common tactic for opposing counsel to seek the depositions of top corporate executives. These depositions are generically referred to as apex depositions....more

Weintraub Tobin

If You Sue Facebook, What's The Likelihood You'll Be Allowed To Depose Mark Zuckerberg?

Weintraub Tobin on

Companies are no strangers to litigation. In California, it is a cost of doing business. Unfortunately, it is not uncommon for litigants to try to gain leverage in a dispute with a corporate party by attempting to depose its...more

Fish & Richardson

The Corporate Litigant and Rule 30(b)(6) Depositions: The Duty to Prepare the Corporate Representative to Testify

Fish & Richardson on

On November 9, 2016, United States Magistrate Judge Paul D. Stickney (N.D. Tex.) entered an Order that serves as a reminder to corporate litigants and their counsel that the demands of Rule 30(b)(6) should not be disregarded...more

PilieroMazza PLLC

The Corporate Designee in Commercial Litigation – the Voice That Binds the Company

PilieroMazza PLLC on

A corporate entity is regarded by the law as a “person” for purposes of standing to sue and be sued, but an organization, whether corporation, partnership, governmental organization, or other entity, can act only through its...more

Stinson LLP

When Nobody Knows the Answers: What to Do When a 30 (B)(6) Notice is Served on a Successor Corporation

Stinson LLP on

SUCCESSOR CORPORATION - Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 30(b)(6) allows a party to take the deposition of an organization by identifying the topics about which the party seeks information from the corporation. In...more

Butler Snow LLP

To Speak or Not to Speak: The “Personal Knowledge” Requirement of a Corporate Representative

Butler Snow LLP on

Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 30(b)(6) permits a corporate representative to testify during deposition about matters within the corporation’s knowledge. This testimony does not require the corporate representative to have...more

Foley & Lardner LLP

When Must Executives Testify in Corporate Litigation? Wisconsin Judge Provides Insight

Foley & Lardner LLP on

When can top executives in large corporations and other organizations avoid testifying in litigation involving the organization? Under a recent ruling by Federal Judge William Conley of Madison, the answer turns, in part, on...more

Arnall Golden Gregory LLP

The Apex Doctrine: Protect Your Corporate Executives From Harassment

Because few cases proceed to trial, discovery and, more specifically, depositions are the focal point in most civil litigation. The permissible scope of discovery is usually very broad – permitting a party to discover...more

Arnall Golden Gregory LLP

Proven Strategies For Handling Difficult Deposition Questions

When we prepare 30(b)(6) corporate representatives and executives for their depositions, they are often fearful that the questioning attorney will try to trick them into admitting something that is not entirely accurate. They...more

19 Results
 / 
View per page
Page: of 1

"My best business intelligence, in one easy email…"

Your first step to building a free, personalized, morning email brief covering pertinent authors and topics on JD Supra:
*By using the service, you signify your acceptance of JD Supra's Privacy Policy.
- hide
- hide