News & Analysis as of

Motion to Compel Interstate Commerce

Jackson Lewis P.C.

Ninth Circuit Continues to Expand Transportation Worker Exemption Under Federal Arbitration Act

Jackson Lewis P.C. on

Courts are finding more workers who do not physically transport goods or people across state lines to be transportation workers exempt from arbitrating their claims under the Federal Arbitration Act (FAA). The U.S. Court of...more

McGlinchey Stafford

Ohio Appeals Court Finds Error in Not Staying Discovery Pending Motion to Compel Arbitration

McGlinchey Stafford on

In Biotricity, Inc. v. DeJohn, 8th Dist. Cuyahoga No. 113216, 2024-Ohio-1593, the Ohio Eighth Appellate District found that the trial court erred by refusing to stay discovery pending a ruling on a motion to compel...more

Seyfarth Shaw LLP

The Long And Winding Road: Ninth Circuit Exempts Last-Leg Drivers From Arbitration Under The Federal Arbitration Act

Seyfarth Shaw LLP on

Seyfarth Synopsis: The Ninth Circuit recently extended the scope of which transportation workers are exempt from arbitration under the Federal Arbitration Act (“FAA”). In Carmona Mendoza v. Domino’s Pizza, LLC, – F.4th –,...more

Epstein Becker & Green

Ninth Circuit Rules Domino’s Truck Drivers Exempt from FAA

On July 21, 2023, a unanimous three-judge panel once again affirmed a California federal court’s ruling that the truck drivers who deliver ingredients from Domino’s Southern California Supply Chain Center to Domino’s...more

Carlton Fields

South Carolina Supreme Court Finds Contract Did Not Involve Interstate Commerce and Reverses Order Compelling Arbitration

Carlton Fields on

In Hicks Unlimited, Inc. v. UniFirst Corporation, the Supreme Court of South Carolina agreed with a trial court ruling that the underlying contract between the parties, which included mandatory arbitration “to be governed by...more

CDF Labor Law LLP

CA Court of Appeal Upholds Arbitration Agreement Under FAA Preemption

CDF Labor Law LLP on

Evenskaas v. California Transit Inc. reversed a Los Angeles Superior Court judge’s denial of an employer’s motion to compel arbitration of a former employee’s wage and hour class action. The trial court had concluded that the...more

Carlton Fields

Ninth Circuit Concludes Domino’s Drivers Are Exempt From FAA

Carlton Fields on

The Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals recently concluded that the Federal Arbitration Act’s exemption for “workers engaged in foreign or interstate commerce” applied to drivers and precluded their employer from compelling...more

Carlton Fields

Ninth Circuit Affirms That Uber Driver Not Engaged in “Foreign or Interstate Commerce” for Purposes of Exemption to FAA

Carlton Fields on

The Ninth Circuit denied a petition seeking to vacate an order compelling arbitration of an Uber driver’s putative class action. The district court held that rideshare drivers who pick up and drop off passengers at airports...more

Epstein Becker & Green

Court to Consider Whether California Ride Share Drivers Who Make Airport Runs Are Exempt from the Federal Arbitration Act

Epstein Becker & Green on

On November 26, 2019, San Francisco Superior Court Judge Richard B. Ulmer ruled that the Federal Arbitration Act (“FAA”) might not apply to Uber drivers who are engaged in interstate commerce while driving passengers to or...more

Womble Bond Dickinson

Court enforces Arbitration Clause in Clickwrap Agreement of “Ganjapreneur” App

Womble Bond Dickinson on

A California Court granted Defendant’s motion to compel arbitration based on a duly formed and consented arbitration clause via a “clickwrap” agreement, despite Plaintiff’s argument that no contract was ever formed because...more

Fisher Phillips

Gig Companies Lose Round 2 in New Prime Battle As Courts Debate Whether Workers Are Exempt From Arbitration

Fisher Phillips on

A federal appeals court decided last week that ride-share drivers engaging in interstate commerce while performing work for Uber should not be subject to the company’s arbitration agreement because of a recent Supreme Court...more

Payne & Fears

Nevada Supreme Court Affirms that Arbitration Agreements in CC&Rs are Binding and Enforceable

Payne & Fears on

In a win for residential developers seeking an alternative forum to resolve construction-defect claims, the Nevada Supreme Court rules that arbitration agreements in CC&Rs are enforceable. Based on the following, the court...more

Manatt, Phelps & Phillips, LLP

Entertainment and Media Litigation Update - October 2015

The "Dancing Baby" Case—Ninth Circuit Rules That "Fair Use" Must First Be Considered Before Sending Takedown Notices Under the DMCA - Why it matters: On September 14, 2015, the Ninth Circuit ruled in Lenz v. Universal...more

Burr & Forman

TN COA: Arbitrators Decide Scope and Unconscionability

Burr & Forman on

The Tennessee Court of Appeals at Jackson recently enforced a NY choice-of-law provision against an arbitration challenge, holding that courts determine contract-formation issues, while arbitrators decide the scope and...more

14 Results
 / 
View per page
Page: of 1

"My best business intelligence, in one easy email…"

Your first step to building a free, personalized, morning email brief covering pertinent authors and topics on JD Supra:
*By using the service, you signify your acceptance of JD Supra's Privacy Policy.
- hide
- hide