News & Analysis as of

No-Poaching Corporate Counsel

White & Case LLP

Labour related agreements in the European Commission’s antitrust spotlight: New Policy Brief on Antitrust in Labour Markets

White & Case LLP on

Until now, the European Commission's (EC) antitrust focus on labour-related issues has been timid. This may soon change. The EC has recently published a policy brief on labour markets, explaining that in its view, wage-fixing...more

Brownstein Hyatt Farber Schreck

Labor Markets and ‘No-Poach’ Agreements: FTC, Colorado AG Take Aim at Kroger-Albertsons Merger

The Federal Trade Commission (“FTC”) and the Colorado attorney general have filed separate lawsuits challenging the proposed acquisition by The Kroger Company (“Kroger”) of Albertsons Companies, Inc. (“Albertsons”). Two...more

Morrison & Foerster LLP

Quarterly Cartel Catch-Up: What to Watch in 2024

The year 2023 ended with a bang in the cartel space, with a federal court of appeals upending what was long believed to be the scope of conduct that should be considered per se under the Sherman Act. The new year, 2024,...more

Littler

Federal and State Authorities Bring Antitrust Enforcement to the Contingent Workforce Sector

Littler on

The U.S. Department of Justice (DOJ), Federal Trade Commission (FTC), and now state attorneys general, have set their sights on staffing companies in their evolving efforts to examine labor markets through an antitrust lens....more

Axinn, Veltrop & Harkrider LLP

Ending Where It Began?: DOJ No-Poach Prosecutions Take Another Hit

The Department of Justice’s years-long campaign to criminally prosecute no-poach agreements may be taking a hiatus. On November 13, 2023, the DOJ moved to dismiss its indictment against Surgical Care Affiliates, LLC (“SCA”),...more

DarrowEverett LLP

Q3 Employment Law Updates: Enforcement Actions Bring Much for Employers to Consider

DarrowEverett LLP on

The third quarter of 2023 has been pretty exciting as far as employment lawyers are concerned. Substantial regulations have been proposed and the pressure from federal agencies continues to rise. We will talk about some of...more

Manatt, Phelps & Phillips, LLP

Fresh Off the Grill: No-Poach Agreements May Lead to Per Se Antitrust Liability, Says 7th Circuit

Introduction - No-poach agreements, wherein companies agree not to solicit or hire employees away from a competitor, have been targeted by the White House, the Federal Trade Commission (FTC) and the Antitrust Division....more

Vinson & Elkins LLP

Seventh Circuit Revives Former McDonald’s Workers’ No-Poach Suit

Vinson & Elkins LLP on

An important federal appeals court has clarified a key principle of antitrust law in a way that potentially makes it more difficult for an employer to win a motion to dismiss, and thereby avoid expensive discovery, with...more

Davies Ward Phillips & Vineberg LLP

Employers Beware: Amendments to the Canadian Competition Act’s Criminal Conspiracy Provisions Take Effect

Amendments to the Canadian Competition Act (Act), taking effect on June 23, 2023, will make it a criminal offence for unaffiliated employers to agree, conspire or arrange to: •“fix, maintain, decrease or control salaries,...more

Miller Canfield

No Poaching - Upcoming Changes to Canada’s Competition Act

Miller Canfield on

The federal Canadian Competition Act is the principal legislation that aims to deter and prevent anti-competitive practices in the Canadian marketplace. One year ago, the Canadian government made major amendments to the act. ...more

Blake, Cassels & Graydon LLP

Nouvelles lignes directrices sur l’application de la loi aux accords de fixation des salaires et de non-débauchage

Le 30 mai 2023, le Bureau de la concurrence du Canada (le « Bureau ») a publié des Lignes directrices (les « Lignes directrices ») afin de fournir des précisions sur sa nouvelle approche en matière d’application de la loi à...more

Blake, Cassels & Graydon LLP

New Enforcement Guidelines for Wage-Fixing and No-Poach Agreements

On May 30, 2023, Canada’s Competition Bureau (Bureau) published Enforcement Guidelines (Guidance) to provide clarity on its enforcement approach to the new criminal prohibition against wage-fixing and no-poach agreements that...more

The Volkov Law Group

DOJ Suffers Rule 29 Dismissal of Criminal Antirust No-Poach Case in Aerospace Industry

The Volkov Law Group on

The Department of Justice’s Antitrust Division has suffered setbacks in its precedent-setting criminal prosecution of no-poach agreements in labor markets.  The latest and perhaps most surprising defeat occurred when the...more

McGuireWoods LLP

Trial Court Rejects DOJ Antitrust Division’s No-Poach Legal Theory and Acquits Defendants

McGuireWoods LLP on

On April 28, 2023, the Department of Justice Antitrust Division suffered another setback to its expanded criminal prosecution of no-poach agreements. The trial court in United States v. Patel, et al., granted a motion to...more

K&L Gates LLP

No-Poach Agreements Receive Their Marching Orders in the US and Europe: Do's and Don'ts for HR Departments

K&L Gates LLP on

Labor Market Meets Competition Law - In a labor market where companies are competing to attract and retain talent, the rising shortage of highly-skilled employees, high mobility, and high salary demands in certain market...more

White & Case LLP

CMA joins the global pack and signals increased antitrust scrutiny of labour markets

White & Case LLP on

The UK antitrust authority, the CMA, has recently published a guide for employers on how to avoid breaching UK antitrust law in labour markets. This publication signals the UK's intent to ratchet up antitrust scrutiny of...more

Mintz - Antitrust Viewpoints

DOJ Antitrust Division Announces Indictment Against Health Care Staffing Executive For Nurse Wage-Fixing

On March 16, the U.S. Department of Justice Antitrust Division (“DOJ Antitrust Division”) announced that a federal grand jury returned an indictment charging a former health care staffing executive of fixing wages for nurses....more

Cozen O'Connor

Getting Ready for Canada’s Upcoming Ban on Wage-Fixing & No-Poach Agreements

Cozen O'Connor on

Wage-fixing and no-poach agreements will be illegal and subject to criminal penalties and damages actions in Canada as of June 23, 2023, as part of a package of amendments to the Competition Act passed in 2022. The new...more

Patterson Belknap Webb & Tyler LLP

The DOJ Defeats Another Motion to Dismiss a No-Poach Criminal Indictment and Closes Out Another No-Poach and Wage-Fixing Case With...

Two of the Department of Justice’s labor-market criminal antitrust prosecutions have seen interesting recent developments. (See our previous coverage of this prosecution trend, reported on: Feb. 9th; May 2nd; Sept. 22nd; and...more

Faegre Drinker Biddle & Reath LLP

Top Noncompete Developments of 2022

2022 was a relatively quiet year in terms of noncompete developments. However, both state legislatures and courts continued to take steps to narrow the circumstances under which noncompetition and employee non-solicitation...more

Foley Hoag LLP - White Collar Law &...

The DOJ Gets the Green Light in its Latest No-Poach Criminal Prosecution

It has been a tumultuous year for the Department of Justice (“DOJ”) and its recent no-poach criminal prosecution strategy. No-poach agreements, which are arrangements between companies that place restrictions on the hiring...more

Morrison & Foerster LLP

Quarterly Cartel Catch-Up: Year-End Edition 2022

Morrison & Foerster LLP on

In 2022, antitrust authorities around the world were pursuing more investigations, bringing new types of cases, and making policy changes to spark even more enforcement actions. In the United States, the Department of...more

Patterson Belknap Webb & Tyler LLP

The DOJ Finally Secures Its First No-Poach and Wage-Fixing Conviction

Last month, the DOJ finally secured its first criminal conviction for a labor-market antitrust offense.  (Check here for our previous coverage of this prosecution trend.)  VDA OC LLC (“VDA”), a healthcare staffing company,...more

Dorsey & Whitney LLP

Poaching Employees Landed Generator Maker into Hot Water

Dorsey & Whitney LLP on

In a recent trade secrets litigation in the United States District Court in the Northern District of California, a jury awarded the plaintiffs 40 million dollars, half of which was punitive damages. The Court also...more

Epstein Becker & Green

DOJ Secures Its First No-Poach Win With a Guilty Plea by a Healthcare Staffing Firm

Epstein Becker & Green on

It is no secret that the Department of Justice (DOJ) has been largely unsuccessful in the criminal no poach cases it has brought to trial to date. Its most public loss came with the acquittals earlier this year of DaVita, a...more

74 Results
 / 
View per page
Page: of 3

"My best business intelligence, in one easy email…"

Your first step to building a free, personalized, morning email brief covering pertinent authors and topics on JD Supra:
*By using the service, you signify your acceptance of JD Supra's Privacy Policy.
- hide
- hide