News & Analysis as of

Occupational Exposure Coronavirus/COVID-19

Marshall Dennehey

The Appellate Division Reversed and Remanded a Trial Court Order Denying the Plaintiffs’ Motion to Amend Their Complaint and...

Marshall Dennehey on

Estate of Alfredo Pabatao, et al. v. Palisades Med. Ctr., et al., No. A-1740-22 (Apr. 24, 2024) - The plaintiffs had filed a complaint for survival and wrongful death against the defendants, asserting the defendants caused...more

Weber Gallagher Simpson Stapleton Fires &...

New York Workers' Compensation Ruling Roundup - March 2024

This week the 3rd Department released four new cases with a particular focus on psychological injuries. Learn more below. First is Anderson v. City of Yonkers, the 3rd Dept. examined the way the Board reviews psychological...more

Marshall Dennehey

Superior Court Affirms Decision That Claimant Failed to Prove She Contracted COVID-19 at Work, but Does Not Reach Issue of Whether...

Marshall Dennehey on

Hudson v. Beebe Medical Center, S23A-10-002 NEP, 2024 WL 36063 (Del. Super. Jan. 3, 2024). Ms. Hudson worked as a front-line nurse for the employer on its COVID-19 floor in the Fall of 2020. She contracted COVID at some...more

Jackson Lewis P.C.

What Employers Should Know About the Latest CDC COVID-19 Guidance

Jackson Lewis P.C. on

It has been almost exactly four years since the COVID-19 pandemic changed the American working landscape. Many of us followed the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) through multiple changes and guidance,...more

Weber Gallagher Simpson Stapleton Fires &...

New York Workers' Compensation Ruling Roundup

Matter of Fernandez v. NYCTA. CV-23-0309 - The 3rd Dept. affirmed the Board’s decision to disallow this COVID-19 death claim. In this case, it involved an essential worker in the early days of COVID-19. The decedent was a...more

Fisher Phillips

California Relaxes COVID-19 Isolation and Testing Requirements: 5 Points for Employers

Fisher Phillips on

California may be one of the last states standing with a workplace COVID-19 prevention rule in place — but Cal/OSHA just relaxed its related isolation and testing requirements for employers in light of recent public health...more

Jackson Lewis P.C.

California Supreme Court Cases Employers Should Watch in 2024

Jackson Lewis P.C. on

The California Supreme Court issued several important decisions in 2023 about issues such as COVID-19 take-home exposure and arbitrating Private Attorney General Act (PAGA) claims. Employers should continue to be aware of...more

Marshall Dennehey

Risk of Exposure to COVID-19 at Employer’s Poultry Processing Plant Was Not Distinct From That Attending Employment in General.

Marshall Dennehey on

Fowler v. Perdue Farms, 2023 WL 6888918 (Del. Super. Oct. 18, 2023) - Mr. Fowler alleged that he suffered a compensable COVID-19 exposure while working as a “boxer” at a poultry processing plant. The Industrial Accident Board...more

Robinson+Cole Manufacturing Law Blog

Tackle Flu Season with Confidence

It’s the season of football, fall foliage, and unfortunately, the flu. As the temperatures dip and boxes of tissues begin to fly off the shelves, it’s time for employers to prepare to meet the challenges of cold and flu...more

Locke Lord LLP

Employers Not Responsible for Spread ‎of COVID-19 by Employees Off the Clock, ‎California Supreme ‎Court Says

Locke Lord LLP on

On July 6, 2023, the California Supreme Court issued a unanimous decision in Kuciemba v. Victory Woodworks, Inc., No. S274191, 2023 WL 4360826 (Cal. July 6, 2023), limiting the scope of employer liability to third parties in...more

Manatt, Phelps & Phillips, LLP

Employer Not Liable for Employee’s Spouse’s COVID-19

Answering certified questions from the Ninth U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals, the California Supreme Court found that public policy precluded holding an employer liable where an employee’s spouse suffered from COVID-19...more

Lewitt Hackman

California Courts Weighing In re Employees and COVID-19

Lewitt Hackman on

California courts recently issued two guiding decisions relating to COVID-19: In Thai v. International Business Machines Corp., 2023 Cal. App. LEXIS 526, the Court of Appeal held that a government mandate to work from...more

Beveridge & Diamond PC

California Employers are not Liable for the Spread of COVID-19 to Household Members

The California Supreme Court held this month that employers do not owe a duty of care under California law to prevent the spread of COVID-19 to employees’ household members. Kuciemba v. Victory Woodworks, Inc., S274191 (July...more

Ogletree, Deakins, Nash, Smoak & Stewart,...

California Supreme Court Holds Employers Do Not Owe Duty of Care to Prevent the Spread of COVID-19 Outside the Workplace

The Supreme Court of California recently held that the California Workers’ Compensation Act (WCA) does not bar an employee’s spouse from bringing a negligence claim against the employer where the employee contracts COVID-19...more

CDF Labor Law LLP

California Supreme Court Declines to Impose Tort Duty on Employers to Prevent Spread of COVID-19 to Employees’ Households

CDF Labor Law LLP on

The California Supreme Court held last week that a California employer does not owe a duty of care to prevent the spread of COVID-19 to members of an employee’s household. In a unanimous decision, Kuciemba v. Victory...more

Jackson Lewis P.C.

California Supreme Court Rules Against COVID-19 Take-Home Exposure Liability for Employers

Jackson Lewis P.C. on

The California Supreme Court in Kuciemba v. Victory Woodworks, Inc was asked to rule on two questions by the 9th Circuit: 1. If an employee contracts COVID-19 at the workplace and brings the virus home to a spouse, causing...more

Seyfarth Shaw LLP

California Supremes Set Bounds on Employer Duty to Non-Workers

Seyfarth Shaw LLP on

Seyfarth Synopsis: The California Supreme Court unanimously held that while claims brought by an employee’s spouse for COVID injury are not barred by the Workers’ Compensation Act’s (WCA) exclusivity provision, policy...more

Seyfarth Shaw LLP

Cal/OSHA Turns Up The Heat on Employers

Seyfarth Shaw LLP on

Seyfarth Synopsis: After a lengthy delay due in part to the COVID-19 pandemic, Cal/OSHA has published its proposed indoor heat illness prevention standard. After the publication, there is a 45-day comment period, ending at...more

CDF Labor Law LLP

COVID-19 Workplace Rules Linger For California Employers Even Absent a COVID-19 Emergency

CDF Labor Law LLP on

Effective February 3, 2023 and in place until February 3, 2025, Cal-OSHA’s Non-Emergency Regulations direct all employers to continue to follow certain COVID-19 guidance. As a result, employers should vigilantly monitor the...more

Lewitt Hackman

New COVID-19 Prevention Regulations Are Now in Effect: The End of Exclusion Pay

Lewitt Hackman on

Download PDF On December 15, 2022, the California Occupational Safety and Health Standards Board voted to adopt non-emergency COVID-19 prevention regulations (“New Regulations.”) The New Regulations, which went into effect...more

Littler

Cal/OSHA’s Non-Emergency COVID-19 Regulation Is Approved and in Effect for Next Two Years

Littler on

On February 3, 2023, California’s Office of Administrative Law approved Cal/OSHA’s COVID-19 Non-Emergency Regulation (NER). The NER is now the operative COVID-19 regulation for most California employers. Cal/OSHA also...more

Epstein Becker & Green

New York HERO Act Enhanced Workplace Safety Committee Enforcement Provisions Enacted

Epstein Becker & Green on

On December 28, 2022, New York Governor Kathy Hochul signed into law Senate Bill 9450, which added new enforcement provisions to the New York Health And Essential Rights Act’s (NY HERO Act) workplace safety committee...more

Davis Wright Tremaine LLP

Cal/OSHA Approves COVID-19 Prevention Non-Emergency Regulations

On December 15, 2022, the California Occupational Safety and Health Standards Board (Cal/OSHA) voted to adopt COVID-19 Prevention Non-Emergency Regulations (Non-Emergency Regulations). Approval by the Office of Administrative...more

Faegre Drinker Biddle & Reath LLP

Summary of Cal/OSHA’s Non-Emergency COVID-19 Prevention Regulations

On December 31, 2022, the Cal/OSHA Emergency Temporary Standards (ETS), as previously summarized, expire after being in place since November 2020. On December 15, 2022, the California Occupational Safety & Health Standards...more

CDF Labor Law LLP

Cal/OSHA Adopts New “Non-Emergency” COVID-19 Prevention Regulations

CDF Labor Law LLP on

For the last two years, California employers have been subject to the careful eye of Cal/OSHA and its COVID-19 Emergency Temporary Standards (or “ETS”). Yesterday, the Standards Board finally voted to adopt a new,...more

381 Results
 / 
View per page
Page: of 16

"My best business intelligence, in one easy email…"

Your first step to building a free, personalized, morning email brief covering pertinent authors and topics on JD Supra:
*By using the service, you signify your acceptance of JD Supra's Privacy Policy.
- hide
- hide