News & Analysis as of

Public Officials

Bricker Graydon LLP

New AOS Requirement: All Employees and Elected Officials of a Political Subdivision Required to Complete Online Fraud Training by...

Bricker Graydon LLP on

Per recent updates to various sections of Ohio law, all employees and elected officials of public entities in Ohio are required to report alleged fraud, theft in office, or misuse or misappropriation of public money....more

BakerHostetler

‘Bribe’ vs. ‘Tip’ - The Implications of Snyder v. United States for Companies

BakerHostetler on

In 2012 and 2013, while James Snyder was the mayor of Portage, Indiana, the city purchased garbage trucks from local trucking company Great Lakes Peterbilt for roughly $1.1 million....more

Polsinelli

“Tokens of Appreciation:” Supreme Court Continues to Weaken Corruption Laws

Polsinelli on

On June 26, 2024, the Supreme Court of the United States released its opinion in Snyder v. United States, holding that 18 U.S.C. §666, relating to theft or bribery concerning programs receiving federal funds, forbids bribes...more

The Volkov Law Group

Supreme Court Continues to Pare Back Criminal Laws

The Volkov Law Group on

In a pair of rulings issued near the end of the last Term, Fischer v. United States and Snyder v. United States, the Supreme Court continued to cut back on the Justice Department’s interpretation and enforcement of criminal...more

Benesch

“Tip” Away?! SCOTUS Rules That 18 U.S.C. § 666 Does Not Criminalize Gratuities

Benesch on

On Wednesday, June 26, 2024, the Supreme Court ruled that the federal anti-bribery statute does not make it a crime for state and local officials to accept a gratuity for acts taken in the past....more

Womble Bond Dickinson

Supreme Court Resolves Circuit Split and Finds Federal Gratuities Inapplicable to State and Local Officials

Womble Bond Dickinson on

On June 26, 2024, the U.S. Supreme Court issued an opinion in a public corruption case that could have a lasting impact on how the U.S. Government prosecutes corruption and procurement fraud cases involving state and local...more

Baker Donelson

Timing is Everything: The Court's Latest Gift to Defendants in Bribery Prosecutions (Snyder v. United States)

Baker Donelson on

Readers of prior Firm client alerts in the white-collar criminal space will no doubt recall the Supreme Court's recent trend of scaling back the powers of the Department of Justice (DOJ) in prosecuting public corruption...more

McDermott Will & Emery

Supreme Court Limits Scope of Anti-Bribery Statute for State Officials

In Snyder v. United States, the Supreme Court of the United States held that it is not a federal crime for state and local officials to accept gratuities under 18 U.S.C. § 666. In so doing, the Court overturned the decision...more

Skadden, Arps, Slate, Meagher & Flom LLP

US Supreme Court Holds That Federal Bribery Law Does Not Criminalize Gratuities

On June 26, 2024, the U.S. Supreme Court found that the main federal anti-corruption statute proscribing bribes to state and local officials does not criminalize gratuities, which the Court described as “payments made to an...more

Morgan Lewis

Despite Snyder Ruling, Gratuities Still an Issue for Government Contractors

Morgan Lewis on

The US Supreme Court’s June 26 ruling in Snyder v. United States clarified that the primary federal law regulating state and local corruption, 18 USC § 666, does not bar state and local officials from accepting...more

Sands Anderson PC

U.S. Supreme Court Says Federal Bribery Statute Permits “Gratuities”: Virginia Law Much Less Forgiving

Sands Anderson PC on

Last month, in Snyder v. United States, the Supreme Court of the United States narrowly construed the federal anti-bribery statute.  In that case, the mayor of Portage, Indiana worked with other officials to carefully prepare...more

Bradley Arant Boult Cummings LLP

Supreme Court Holds Bribery Statute Does Not Criminalize After-the-Fact Gratuities

In the latest example of the Roberts court reining in the government’s use of broadly worded criminal statutes, on June 26, 2024, the Supreme Court ruled in United States v. Snyder that the federal bribery statute does not...more

Epstein Becker & Green

Two Down, 12 to Go, and Two More Decision Days This Week - SCOTUS Today

Epstein Becker & Green on

The Supreme Court started yesterday with 14 decisions yet to deliver and only reduced the number by two—neither of them the Trump immunity case nor the Loper case concerning the future of the agency deference doctrine of...more

Faegre Drinker Biddle & Reath LLP

Supreme Court Decides Snyder v. United States

On June 26, 2024, the U.S. Supreme Court decided Snyder v. United States, No. 23-108, holding that federal statute 18 U. S. C. § 666, which makes it a crime for most state and local officials to “corruptly” solicit, accept,...more

Latham & Watkins LLP

Recent Developments for UK PLCs June Edition 2024

Latham & Watkins LLP on

FCA Issues Reminders on Annual Reporting and LTIP Disclosure Requirements - On 22 May 2024, the FCA published Primary Market Bulletin 49 (PMB 49) reminding listed companies of certain continuing obligations under the...more

Tucker Arensberg, P.C.

Supreme Court Addresses Social Media Usage by a Public Official

Lindke v. Freed, 2024 U.S. LEXIS 1214 (2024) (A public official who blocks someone from commenting on the official’s social-media page engages in state action under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 only if the official both 1) possessed...more

Blake, Cassels & Graydon LLP

Projet de loi C-70 : Lourd fardeau de conformité du registre pour la transparence en matière d’influence étrangère

En réponse aux préoccupations soulevées par l’ingérence étrangère dans les élections canadiennes, lesquelles ont fait couler beaucoup d’encre, le ministre de la Sécurité publique du Canada a présenté le projet de loi C-70,...more

Latham & Watkins LLP

Former Aide to Madagascan President Sentenced for Soliciting Bribes From UK-Based Company

Latham & Watkins LLP on

The sentencing of Romy Andrianarisoa, the first ever foreign public official to be convicted under the Bribery Act 2010, provides important takeaways. On 10 May 2024, Romy Andrianarisoa was sentenced to three-and-a-half...more

Pietragallo Gordon Alfano Bosick & Raspanti,...

Snyder V. United States: Will Public Servants Be Next To Put Out A Tip Jar?

Who would have thought politicians can work for tips? Well, that is what Portage, Indiana Mayor Jim Snyder argued (more or less) before the Supreme Court last month, when he sought to overturn his conviction under 18 U.S.C. §...more

Ary Rosenbaum - The Rosenbaum Law Firm P.C.

You can’t let opinions bother you

I have been blocked by 3 of the sitting 7 members of my local board of education on social media because it’s my opinion that they’re doing a bad job. Imagine that, a publicly elected official with such fragile egos, can’t...more

Bricker Graydon LLP

Supreme Court Issues First in a Series of Social Media Cases Affecting the Public Sector

Bricker Graydon LLP on

On March 15, 2024, the United States Supreme Court issued a much-awaited decision on two cases that now create guardrails on when government officials can and cannot block private citizens from social media accounts....more

Parker Poe Adams & Bernstein LLP

U.S. Supreme Court Sets New Standards for Public Officials' Use of Social Media

There are about 20 million state and local government employees across the United States. Many of them use social media for personal reasons or for official communications. ...more

Bricker Graydon LLP

Township Civility: Dealing with Difficult Residents, Staff, and Elected Officials

Bricker Graydon LLP on

There is not a public servant, employee, or trustee who doesn’t have a war story regarding an unruly public meeting or hearing gone wild. Perhaps it was just a quirky public comment. Maybe it’s a viral comment from a public...more

Rumberger | Kirk

SCOTUS Clarifies Scope of Social Media Liability for Public Officials

Rumberger | Kirk on

On March 15, 2024, the United States Supreme Court handed down its decisions in Lindke v. Freed and O’Connor-Ratcliff v. Garnier, two similar cases which broadly asked when public officials may be liable for their use of...more

Saiber LLC

The Supreme Court Addresses When Public Officials Can Block Social Media Followers

Saiber LLC on

On March 15, 2024, the Supreme Court of the United States issued decisions in Lindke v. Freed and Garnier v. O’Connor-Ratcliff, two cases which involved when public officials can block social media followers and delete their...more

271 Results
 / 
View per page
Page: of 11

"My best business intelligence, in one easy email…"

Your first step to building a free, personalized, morning email brief covering pertinent authors and topics on JD Supra:
*By using the service, you signify your acceptance of JD Supra's Privacy Policy.
- hide
- hide