News & Analysis as of

Rest and Meal Break Penalties

Ogletree, Deakins, Nash, Smoak & Stewart,...

Minnesota Employment Legislative Update 2025, Part II: It’s Déjà Vu - Lengthy Omnibus Bills, Buried Employment Law Changes

Last year’s Minnesota legislative session resulted in a 1,000-page omnibus bill that included significant changes to the state’s labor and employment laws. As this year’s legislative session comes to a close, we predict a...more

ArentFox Schiff

Illinois Amends One Day Rest in Seven Act to Prohibit Retaliation

ArentFox Schiff on

The One Day Rest in Seven Act is an Illinois law providing employees with the right to meal breaks and one full day of rest each work week....more

FordHarrison

Illinois One Day Rest in Seven Act and Meal Break Law: How Employers Can Protect Themselves

FordHarrison on

Real World Impact: A recent increase in complaints under the Illinois One Day Rest in Seven Act (ODRISA) highlights the necessity for Illinois employers to be familiar with the requirements of this law....more

Seyfarth Shaw LLP

Court of Appeals Issues New Ruling On Penalties For Missed Breaks, New Filings Increasing

Seyfarth Shaw LLP on

On September 30, 2024, the Washington State Court of Appeals (Division I) issued a new opinion, Androckitis v. Virginia Mason Medical Center, 556 P.3d 714 (2024), addressing the appropriate penalties for an employee who...more

Ogletree, Deakins, Nash, Smoak & Stewart,...

Navigating Meal Period Compliance: Key Insights From Recent Washington Court Ruling for Employers

An appellate court in Washington state recently held a hospital liable to pay employees who worked through meal period breaks for their time worked plus compensation for an additional break as a penalty, highlighting...more

Fisher Phillips

California Supreme Court Rules Public Employers Are Exempt from PAGA: What Employers Need to Know + 4 Practical Tips

Fisher Phillips on

The California Supreme Court just ruled that public employers are not subject to civil penalties under the state’s Private Attorneys General Act of 2004 (PAGA). In a pivotal decision, the court held that public entities,...more

Husch Blackwell LLP

PAGA Reforms: Not a Panacea but Significant Relief for California Employers

Husch Blackwell LLP on

On July 1, 2024, California Governor Gavin Newsom signed two legislative bills (AB 2288, amending Labor Code Section 2699; and SB 92, amending Section 2699.3) into law, effective July 1, 2024. The new law significantly...more

ArentFox Schiff

In a Rare Win for Employers, the California Supreme Court Holds That Wage Statement Penalties Are Not Available if an Employer...

ArentFox Schiff on

In Naranjo v. Spectrum Security Services, Inc., Case No. S279397 (May 6, 2024), the California Supreme Court held that if an employer reasonably and in good faith believed it was providing a complete and accurate wage...more

Farella Braun + Martel LLP

Navigating California Wage Statement Penalties After Naranjo v. Spectrum Security Services, Inc.

On May 6, 2024, the California Supreme Court, in Naranjo v. Spectrum Security Services, Inc., clarified that an employer is not liable for statutory penalties for inaccurate wage statements when it had a good faith and...more

Davis Wright Tremaine LLP

California Supreme Court: Employees Are Not Entitled to Wage Statement Penalties When Employer Acted in Good Faith

Earlier this week, a unanimous California Supreme Court held that employers have a viable good faith defense to claims for statutory penalties arising out of wage statement violations. The Court's decision, in Naranjo v....more

Payne & Fears

Employers Have a Good Faith Defense to Statutory Penalties for Wage Statement Violations

Payne & Fears on

The Question - The basics of California’s wage statement requirements should be familiar to employers. The consequences for failing to comply with these requirements can be severe....more

Proskauer - California Employment Law

Abused California Employers Score A Rare Victory!

The California Supreme Court handed employers a consolation prize this week, holding that an employer does not incur monetary penalties if there is a reasonable, good faith dispute over whether the employer violated the wage...more

K&L Gates LLP

Keeping the Faith: Employer's Good Faith Belief Prevails

K&L Gates LLP on

In a rare victory for employers, the California Supreme Court unanimously held in Naranjo v. Spectrum Sec. Serv., Inc., S279397 (Decided 6 May 2024) that an employer’s “objectively reasonable, good faith belief” that it has...more

Foley & Lardner LLP

Illinois Imposes New Requirements on Employers Who Use Staffing Agencies

Foley & Lardner LLP on

Illinois employers who use staffing agencies should take note. The state’s Day and Temporary Labor Services Act (the “Act”), which was last revised by the General Assembly in 2017, was significantly amended this past...more

ArentFox Schiff

Good Faith Defense Defeats Penalties on California Break Issues

ArentFox Schiff on

Last year, in Naranjo v. Spectrum Security Services, Inc., 13 Cal.5th 93 (2022), the California Supreme Court held that an employer’s failure to timely pay premium pay for meal and rest break violations could subject the...more

Proskauer - California Employment Law

Good News for Employers: Good Faith Belief of Compliance Precludes Both Final Wage and Wage Statement Penalties

Last summer, we reported here the California Supreme Court ruling that premium payments owed under Labor Code section 226.7 for meal and rest break violations constitute “wages.” The Naranjo et al. v. Spectrum Sec. Servs.,...more

Foley & Lardner LLP

More Breaks for Illinois Employees (Or Else More Penalties for Employers)

Foley & Lardner LLP on

Employers operating in Illinois should be aware that as of January 2023, they will be required to provide additional rest and meal breaks to most non-exempt employees. On May 13, 2022, Illinois Governor J.B. Pritzker signed...more

McDermott Will & Emery

California Supreme Court Clarifies Missed-Break Premiums Penalties

McDermott Will & Emery on

On May 23, 2022, the California Supreme Court issued its decision in Naranjo v. Spectrum Sec. Servs. Inc. (Naranjo), holding that meal and rest break premiums (also known as extra pay or premium pay) constitute “wages” that:...more

Perkins Coie

CA Court Confirms Employers Must Timely Pay and Report Meal Period Premiums or Face Additional Penalties

Perkins Coie on

The California Supreme Court, on May 23, 2022, issued a seminal opinion in Naranjo v. Spectrum Security Services, Inc., which found that employees can recover penalties for failure to timely pay wages at termination and...more

ArentFox Schiff

Breaking News: California Break Premium Pay Can Trigger Waiting Time and Wage Statement Penalties

ArentFox Schiff on

In addition, on a point with broader implications, the Supreme Court held that wage statements must include all wages earned, and not just wages paid, with any wages earned but unpaid possibly triggering penalties for an...more

Buchalter

Naranjo v. Spectrum Security Services, Inc.: The California Supreme Court Determines that Meal and Rest Premiums are Wages and...

Buchalter on

On May 23 2022, the California Supreme Court reversed the Second Appellate District Court of Appeal and made clear that meal and rest period premiums (or “extra pay” or “premium pay”) constitute “wages” and must be accurately...more

BakerHostetler

California Supreme Court Allows Employees to Seek Derivative Penalties for Meal and Rest Break Violations

BakerHostetler on

On May 23, the California Supreme Court issued an opinion that will drastically increase the potential exposure for employers facing meal and rest break class actions. The court, in Naranjo v. Spectrum Security Services,...more

Fox Rothschild LLP

Is There Any Viable Defense To A Dreaded PAGA Claim?

Fox Rothschild LLP on

In plain English, PAGA allows a Court to award a penalty for each pay period that includes a wage-and-hour violation. It does not include the damages for the underlying violation, just the discretionary penalty, which starts...more

Davis Wright Tremaine LLP

Meal or Rest Break Premiums Do Not Trigger Waiting Time or Wage Statement Penalties

Update February 10, 2021: This blog has been updated to reflect current guidance about California meal and rest break laws. On September 26, 2019, California’s Second District Court of Appeals in Gustavo Naranjo, et al. v....more

Hogan Lovells

California Appellate Rulings Give Employers Some Good News On Break Premiums

Hogan Lovells on

The filing of class actions against California employers for meal and rest break violations remain as prevalent as ever, but the California Courts of Appeal have recently issued two rulings that may help employer-defendants....more

31 Results
 / 
View per page
Page: of 2

"My best business intelligence, in one easy email…"

Your first step to building a free, personalized, morning email brief covering pertinent authors and topics on JD Supra:
*By using the service, you signify your acceptance of JD Supra's Privacy Policy.
- hide
- hide