News & Analysis as of

Supreme Court of the United States › Subject Matter Jurisdiction

The United States Supreme Court is the highest court of the United States and is charged with interpreting federal law, including the United States Constitution. The Court's docket is largely discretionary... more +
The United States Supreme Court is the highest court of the United States and is charged with interpreting federal law, including the United States Constitution. The Court's docket is largely discretionary with only a limited number of cases granted review each term.  The Court is comprised of one chief justice and eight associate justices, who are nominated by the President and confirmed by the Senate to hold lifetime positions. less -
Foley & Lardner LLP

FINRA In-House Disciplinary Proceedings Survive Post-Jarkesy Challenge … For Now

Foley & Lardner LLP on

On September 4, 2024, the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania denied D. Allen Blankenship’s challenge to enjoin the Financial Industry Regulatory Authority’s (FINRA) disciplinary action...more

Miller Canfield

Justices Leave Federal Jurisdiction over Enforcement of Arbitration Awards Unclear

Miller Canfield on

The Federal Arbitration Act (FAA) requires federal courts to enforce agreements to arbitrate that impact interstate commerce. The FAA and its body of case law are binding on state courts and many states have adopted similar...more

Dechert LLP

Dechert Re:Torts - Issue 16

Dechert LLP on

Supreme Court to Resolve Availability of RICO Claims to Personal Injury Plaintiffs - On April 29, 2024, the Supreme Court granted certiorari in Medical Marijuana, Inc. v. Horn, No. 23-365, 2024 WL 1839091 (U.S. Apr. 29,...more

Foley & Lardner LLP

Master of Its Choice of Forum?

Foley & Lardner LLP on

On April 29, 2024, the U.S. Supreme Court agreed to review whether a plaintiff may compel the remand of a case removed on the basis of federal question jurisdiction by voluntarily amending its complaint to leave only state...more

Dorsey & Whitney LLP

The Supreme Court Update - April 29, 2024

Dorsey & Whitney LLP on

Today, the Supreme Court of the United States granted certiorari in four cases: Medical Marijuana, Inc. v. Horn, No. 23-365: This case involves interpretation of the Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organizations Act...more

Snell & Wilmer

The Ninth Circuit Affirms Tribal Court Jurisdiction Over Insurance Provider

Snell & Wilmer on

On February 29, 2024, the Ninth Circuit issued its opinion in Lexington Insurance Co. v. Smith (Suquamish Tribe). The Court affirmed the tribal court’s subject-matter jurisdiction over Lexington pursuant to the Tribe’s...more

McDermott Will & Emery

Badgerow Enforced: District Court Lacks Independent Jurisdiction to Enforce Arbitration Award

McDermott Will & Emery on

The US Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit reversed and remanded a district court’s arbitration award because the district court lacked proper subject matter jurisdiction, independent from the Federal Arbitration Act...more

Skadden, Arps, Slate, Meagher & Flom LLP

The Class Action Chronicle - August 2023

Skadden, Arps, Slate, Meagher & Flom LLP on

Post-TransUnion, A Closer Examination of Threshold for Article III Standing- Class action trials are rare. The potential magnitude of an adverse verdict, even when improbable, makes the risks of trial unpalatable for...more

Holland & Knight LLP

Religious Institutions Update: July 2023

Holland & Knight LLP on

Supreme Court Decides Freedom of Speech Trumps Public Accommodations Law In 303 Creative LLC v. Elenis, No. 21-476 (June 30, 2023), the U.S. Supreme Court reversed 6-3 the lower courts' denial of the injunction the plaintiff...more

Paul Hastings LLP

The IRS Can Obtain Your Bank Records Without Your Knowledge

Paul Hastings LLP on

The U.S. Supreme Court rules that the IRS does not need to provide notice to innocent bank account holders when the summonses are issued in aid of collection of a delinquent taxpayer’s tax assessment. ...more

Morrison & Foerster LLP

U.S. Supreme Court Holds Federal Courts Have Subject-Matter Jurisdiction over Criminal Prosecutions Against Foreign Sovereign...

Morrison & Foerster LLP on

The United States Supreme Court has rejected arguments made by Turkiye Halk Bankasi A.S. (“Halkbank”) that, as a majority state-owned bank and thus an agency or instrumentality of the Republic of Türkiye, it enjoys immunity...more

Stevens & Lee

Challenging the Constitutionality of the FTC’s Fundamental Structure/Processes

Stevens & Lee on

Supreme Court to Hear Oral Arguments in Axon Enterprises- With the October 2022 term of the U.S. Supreme Court (“Court”) now underway, health care providers and others in the health care industry contemplating merger and...more

Morrison & Foerster LLP

U.S. Supreme Court to Decide the Scope of Federal Courts’ Criminal Jurisdiction over Foreign Sovereign Defendants

Morrison & Foerster LLP on

On October 3, 2022, the United States Supreme Court granted certiorari in Turkiye Halk Bankasi A.S. v. United States, No. 21-1450 (“Halkbank”), to determine whether federal courts have subject-matter jurisdiction over...more

Dorsey & Whitney LLP

The Supreme Court - October 3, 2022

Dorsey & Whitney LLP on

Today, on the first day of the new term, the Supreme Court of the United States granted certiorari in nine cases: Gonzalez v. Google LLC, No. 21-1333: Section 203(c)(1) of the Communication Decency Act shields an...more

Payne & Fears

Key California Employment Law Case Summaries: May 2022

Payne & Fears on

Naranjo v. Spectrum Security Services. Inc., No. S258966, 2022 WL 1613499 (Cal. May 23, 2022) Summary: Unpaid meal- and rest-break premiums may serve as the basis for waiting-time penalties and inaccurate wage statement...more

Proskauer - Minding Your Business

Supreme Court Limits Federal Court Jurisdiction to Vacate or Confirm Arbitration Awards

Proskauer - Minding Your Business on

In an 8-1 decision, the United States Supreme Court recently held in Badgerow v. Walters that federal courts may not examine the substance of arbitration disputes to establish federal question jurisdiction under Sections 9...more

K&L Gates LLP

Look At Me, Not Through Me: Supreme Court Limits Federal Jurisdiction for Post-Arbitration Award Petitions

K&L Gates LLP on

On 31 March 2022, the United States Supreme Court in Badgerow v. Walters limited federal subject matter jurisdiction over post-arbitration award petitions under the Federal Arbitration Act (FAA) §§ 9 and 10. After years of...more

Porter Hedges LLP

Supreme Court Narrows Subject Matter Jurisdiction in Arbitration

Porter Hedges LLP on

On March 31, 2022, the United States Supreme Court issued an important decision regarding federal courts’ subject matter jurisdiction to confirm, vacate, or modify arbitral awards under Sections 9 and 10 of the Federal...more

Parker Poe Adams & Bernstein LLP

Supreme Court Limits Federal Jurisdiction over Arbitration Awards

Parker Poe Adams & Bernstein LLP on

Last week in Badgerow v. Walters, the United States Supreme Court held in an 8-1 decision that under the Federal Arbitration Act, a federal court cannot consider an underlying dispute to determine whether it has federal...more

Ogletree, Deakins, Nash, Smoak & Stewart,...

Supreme Court’s New Arbitration Ruling: Limits Federal Jurisdiction For Confirming or Challenging Arbitration Awards Under the FAA

Ogletree, Deakins, Nash, Smoak & Stewart,... on

On March 31, 2022, the Supreme Court of the United States issued a decision in Badgerow v. Walters, No 20-1143, addressing when federal courts have jurisdiction to rule on motions to confirm, modify, or vacate arbitration...more

Perkins Coie

Supreme Court Limits Federal Courts’ Jurisdiction to Enforce Arbitration Awards

Perkins Coie on

Last week, the U.S. Supreme Court ruled that federal courts cannot enforce or vacate arbitration awards under Sections 9 and 10 of the Federal Arbitration Act (FAA), 9 U.S.C. § 1 et seq., unless they have an independent...more

McGlinchey Stafford

Through the Looking Glass: Courts Cannot “Look Through” Arbitration Motion to Establish Jurisdiction

McGlinchey Stafford on

In a nearly unanimous opinion, the United States Supreme Court recently held in Badgerow v. Walters that a district court cannot “look through” to the underlying controversy in order to support jurisdiction to decide a motion...more

BakerHostetler

The Vote is In, FAA Sections 9 And 10 Do Not Provide “Look-Through” Jurisdiction to Confirm or Modify Arbitral Awards

BakerHostetler on

Our prior blog articles predicted that the outcome in Badgerow v. Walters, No. 20-1143, might turn on whether the plain text of the Federal Arbitration Act (FAA) or its purposes would prevail. See our June 16 and Nov. 9, 2021...more

Holland & Knight LLP

Federal Jurisdiction Limited When Confirming or Setting Aside Domestic Arbitration Awards

Holland & Knight LLP on

In a recent decision involving arbitration, the U.S. Supreme Court held that federal courts do not have subject-matter jurisdiction to confirm or vacate a domestic arbitration award under Sections 9 and 10 of the Federal...more

Miller Canfield

Supreme Court Limits Federal Court Jurisdiction Under the Federal Arbitration Act

Miller Canfield on

In a little-noticed recent decision, a nearly-unanimous U.S. Supreme Court significantly narrowed the jurisdiction of the federal courts to confirm, vacate or modify arbitration awards under the Federal Arbitration Act (FAA)....more

87 Results
 / 
View per page
Page: of 4
Next »

"My best business intelligence, in one easy email…"

Your first step to building a free, personalized, morning email brief covering pertinent authors and topics on JD Supra:
Sign up Log in
*By using the service, you signify your acceptance of JD Supra's Privacy Policy.
- hide
- hide