Employment Law Commentary: Unpaid Internships: A Prevalent Practice Called into Question -- Volume 24, No. 5 May 2012 by Morrison & Foerster LLP on 5/23/2012 An unpaid internship for a college student has almost become a rite of passage. Many advocates, however, charge that unpaid internships are just a form of unpaid labor, regardless of the benefits enjoyed by students and...more
Court Issues $35M Award Against Plan Fiduciaries for Excessive Fees by Reed Smith on 5/23/2012 A recent decision, Tussey v. ABB, Inc., 2012 WL 1113291 (W.D. Mo. 3/31/2012), has drawn much attention in the retirement plan community. In Tussey, a U.S. District Court found that ABB, Inc., along with several of the...more
Two Medical Conditions Can Equal One FMLA Serious Health Condition by Franczek Radelet P.C. on 5/23/2012 Employers beware: Just when an employee gives you the left jab, look for the right hook. The combination of the two, as far as the Family and Medical Leave Act is concerned, can knock employers out. As reported by my...more
Attorney Fee Award Should Be Made Payable To Attorney And Not Client by Proskauer - California Employment Law on 5/21/2012 Henry M. Lee represented Ok Song Chang in employment litigation resulting in a $62,000 judgment in Chang's favor following a jury trial. The trial court also awarded Chang $300,000 in attorney fees as a prevailing party under...more
The “Wright” Way to Draft a Termination Provision by Fraser Milner Casgrain LLP on 5/18/2012 n the recently released Ontario Superior Court of Justice decision in Wright v. The Young and Rubicam Group of Companies, it was confirmed that a termination provision in an employment agreement will not be upheld if there...more
Executive Entitled to Bonus Despite Breach of Fiduciary Duty by Fraser Milner Casgrain LLP on 5/18/2012 The Ontario Court of Appeal has recently restored an arbitrator’s decision granting a terminated executive his bonus despite his misappropriation of the employer’s money and resources during the period in which the bonus was...more
Legal Alert: Minnesota Supreme Court Expands Sexual Harassment Cause of Action under State Law by Ford & Harrison LLP on 5/18/2012 Executive Summary: Yesterday, the Minnesota Supreme Court concluded for the first time that a cause of action exists under the Minnesota Human Rights Act (MHRA) for a hostile work environment based on sex without evidence...more
The New NRLB Rules: What is the Current Status? by Davis, Brown, Koehn, Shors & Roberts, P.C. on 5/18/2012 On May 15, 2012, the Federal District Court in Washington, D.C. enjoined effect of the new NLRB election rules, noting in the opinion that the the National Labor Relations Board did not have a legal quorum voting when the...more
Federal Court Invalidates NLRB’s ‘Ambush Election’ Rule by Ballard Spahr LLP on 5/17/2012 Finding that no quorum existed to allow the National Labor Relations Board to take administrative action, a federal judge in Washington, D.C., has struck down the NLRB’s attempt to change the way it handled elections in the...more
Federal Court Enjoins NLRB’s "Ambush Election" Rule on Procedural Grounds; Reprieve for Employers May Prove Short-Lived by Saul Ewing LLP on 5/17/2012 On Monday, May 14, 2012 a federal court in Washington, D.C. issued an Order invalidating the NLRB's controversial "ambush election" rules which took effect on April 30, 2012, on grounds that the rules were not properly...more
Judge Blocks NLRB's Union Election Rules by Pierce Atwood LLP on 5/17/2012 On Monday, a federal judge in Washington, D.C. blocked the National Labor Relations Board’s controversial new rules concerning the union representation election process that had gone into effect at the end of April 2012. The...more
Retaliation Claims Under Civil Rights Statutes by Dinsmore & Shohl LLP on 5/17/2012 Retaliation claims originate from employees engaging in a protected activity, such as reporting a violation of a federal law, and the employer retaliating by taking an adverse employment action against the employee. What is a...more
9th Circuit: Equitable Remedies Post-Amara — Mere Violations of Law Do Not Establish “Harm” Justifying Equitable Remedies by Lane Powell PC - ERISA Law on 5/17/2012 What equitable remedies are available to plan participants? As you probably know, CIGNA v. Amara, 131 S.Ct. 1866, 1878-80 (2011) contains dicta that can be viewed as expanding the range of “equitable relief” available to...more
Act Now Advisory: Court Strikes Down NLRB "Quickie Election" Rules . by Epstein Becker & Green, P.C. on 5/17/2012 In a sharp setback for the National Labor Relations Board (the “Board”), a federal district court in Washington, D.C. (the “Court”), struck down the Board’s election rules, which took effect on April 30, 2012, on technical...more
NLRB Notice Posting Requirement and New Representation Election Rules by Miller Canfield on 5/17/2012 On August 25, 2011, the National Labor Relations Board (NLRB) issued a rule requiring essentially all private employers to post a notice informing employees of their rights under the National Labor Relations Act (the Act). ...more