News & Analysis as of

Amgen Pharmaceutical Industry Patent Infringement

Venable LLP

Amgen Files BPCIA Lawsuit Against Samsung Bioepis Prolia® / Xgeva® Proposed Biosimilar SB16

Venable LLP on

On August 12, 2024, Amgen filed Case No. 1:24-cv-08417 (D.N.J.) against Samsung Bioepis, alleging SB16 (denosumab), its proposed Prolia® / Xgeva® (denosumab) biosimilar, would infringe 34 of Amgen’s patents....more

Goodwin

Amgen Files BPCIA Complaint Against Celltrion Regarding Denosumab

Goodwin on

On May 28, Amgen filed a BPCIA complaint in the District Court for the District of New Jersey against Celltrion related to its denosumab biosimilar of Amgen’s PROLIA and XGEVA. This is the second BPCIA litigation regarding...more

Venable LLP

Amgen Files BPCIA Lawsuit Against Celltrion’s Proposed Prolia® / Xgeva® (Denosumab) Biosimilar CT-P41

Venable LLP on

On May 28, 2024, Amgen filed a BPCIA litigation, Case No. 1:24-cv-06497 (D.N.J.), against Celltrion’s proposed Prolia® / Xgeva® (denosumab) biosimilar CT-P41 alleging infringement of 29 of Amgen’s patents, including one...more

Goodwin

Court Cancels Injunction Hearings In Aflibercept BPCIA Litigation; Regeneron May Seek Temporary Restraining Orders

Goodwin on

As we previously reported, the Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation recently granted Regeneron Pharmaceutical’s (“Regeneron”) motion to establish a multi-district litigation (“MDL”) for its aflibercept BPCIA litigation....more

Morgan Lewis

Blockbuster Biologics Review | Issue 21

Morgan Lewis on

Welcome to our quarterly update relating to biologics and biosimilars, including post-grant and patent litigation challenges to blockbuster biologics. Since the enactment of the Biologics Price Competition and Innovation Act...more

Robins Kaplan LLP

Amgen Inc. v. Sandoz Inc. Otezla® (Apremilast)

Robins Kaplan LLP on

Case Name: Amgen Inc. v. Sandoz Inc., Nos. 2022-1147, 2022-1149, 2022-1150, 2022-1151, 2023 WL 2994166 (Fed. Cir. Apr. 19, 2023) (Circuit Judges Lourie, Cunningham, and Stark presiding; Opinion by Lourie, J.) (Appeal from...more

A&O Shearman

Half an hour for a bifurcation: UPC Central Division rejects preliminary objection after first oral hearing

A&O Shearman on

The decision concerns the time of filing and admissibility of a revocation action at the Central Division when a parallel infringement action is filed at a local division (Art. 33(4) UPCA). Art 33(4) UPCA states that...more

Wilson Sonsini Goodrich & Rosati

Broad Genus Patents Must Be Enabled over the Full Scope of the Claims

Amgen Inc. et al. v. Sanofi et al., No. 22-157 (U.S. 2023) - The U.S. Supreme Court, in a unanimous decision, has affirmed the Federal Circuit’s decision invalidating Amgen’s patent claims covering a genus of antibodies...more

Goodwin

Janssen and Amgen Settle STELARA (Ustekinumab) BPCIA Litigation

Goodwin on

We previously reported on Janssen’s complaint alleging that Amgen’s filing of an aBLA for ustekinumab, a biosimilar of STELARA, infringes Amgen patents, and about Janssen seeking a preliminary injunction to block Amgen from...more

Kilpatrick

The More You Claim, The More You Must Enable – The Supreme Court rules that Amgen’s Genus-Level Antibody Claims Lack Enablement

Kilpatrick on

In a unanimous opinion announced on Thursday, May 18, 2023, the Supreme Court affirmed a Federal Circuit opinion invalidating claims in two patents owned by drugmaker Amgen for failing to properly enable claims directed to...more

Goodwin

Amgen Files BPCIA Complaint Against Sandoz Regarding Denosumab

Goodwin on

On May 1, 2023, Amgen filed a BPCIA complaint in the District of New Jersey against Sandoz related to Sandoz’s denosumab biosimilar of Amgen’s PROLIA® and XGEVA®. This is Amgen’s first BPCIA case filed with respect to a...more

Axinn, Veltrop & Harkrider LLP

The Supreme Court Hears Arguments About the Enablement Standard in Amgen v. Sanofi

The Supreme Court heard arguments this week in Amgen v. Sanofi, the closely-watched case involving the enablement standard for patent claims, particularly as applied to functionally-defined genus claims. The question raised...more

Sterne, Kessler, Goldstein & Fox P.L.L.C.

Amgen Inc. v. Sanofi Live Coverage

On Monday, March 27, 2023, at 10:00 a.m. EDT, the Supreme Court of the United States will hear oral arguments in Amgen Inc. v. Sanofi, No. 21-757. William H. Milliken, a director in Sterne Kessler’s Trial & Appellate Practice...more

Saul Ewing LLP

Supreme Court Grants Cert in Amgen v. Sanofi on Question of Enablement

Saul Ewing LLP on

​On November 4, 2022, the Supreme Court granted certiorari in Amgen v. Sanofi, No. 21-757, agreeing to review, “whether enablement is governed by the statutory requirement that the specification teach those skilled in the art...more

McDonnell Boehnen Hulbert & Berghoff LLP

Supreme Court Grants Certiorari in Amgen v. Sanofi

High Court Will Tackle Proper Enablement Standard - Constituting something of a surprise, the Supreme Court on Friday, November 3rd granted Amgen's petition for certiorari on the second of the Questions Presented in its...more

Carlton Fields

Amgen, Juno And The Fate Of Functional Genus Claims

Carlton Fields on

The U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit issued two significant decisions last year that affect the protection of biotechnology through the use of functional genus claims — Amgen Inc. v. Sanofi and Juno Therapeutics...more

Goodwin

Motion to Dismiss Denied in Amgen v. Hospira BPCIA

Goodwin on

At the end of last month, Judge Connolly denied defendants Hospira and Pfizer’s motion to dismiss following a telephone conference with the parties.  We previously reported back in February 2020 that Amgen sued Pfizer and its...more

Locke Lord LLP

Functional Antibody Claims: Setting the Bar for Enablement

Locke Lord LLP on

On February 11, 2021, in a unanimous decision, the Federal Circuit affirmed the district court’s holding that Amgen Inc., Amgen Manufacturing, Ltd., and Amgen USA, Inc.’s (collectively, “Amgen’s”) antibody composition claims...more

Fish & Richardson

Biosimilars 2020 Year in Review

Fish & Richardson on

Introduction - The biosimilar pathway was designed to increase competition for biologics and reduce healthcare costs. Yet 2020 saw a slowdown in biosimilar activity with the lowest number of annual biosimilar approvals since...more

Rothwell, Figg, Ernst & Manbeck, P.C.

Big Pharma to Face Off at Federal Circuit Oral Arguments Over Antibody Genus Patentability

Mark your calendars – on December 9th, the Federal Circuit is slated to hear oral arguments as to whether two Amgen patents claiming a genus of antibodies meet the enablement requirement of 35 U.S.C. § 112. The court’s...more

Kramer Levin Naftalis & Frankel LLP

Biosimilar Maker Leverages IPR to Avoid Patent Dance and Obtain Early Market Entry

Amgen Inc. and Alexion Pharmaceuticals Inc. settled three Inter Partes Review (IPR) proceedings concerning patents covering Alexion’s blockbuster humanized monoclonal antibody drug Soliris®, with Amgen obtaining a...more

Robins Kaplan LLP

Amgen Inc. v. Amneal Pharms. LLC

Robins Kaplan LLP on

Case Name: Amgen Inc. v. Amneal Pharms. LLC, 2018-2414, 2019-1086, 2020 U.S. App. LEXIS (Fed. Cir. Jan. 7, 2020) (Circuit Judges Newman, Lourie, and Taranto presiding; Opinion by Lourie, J.) (Appeal from D. Del., Goldberg,...more

Goodwin

Amgen v. Sanofi Praulent® Litigation Once Again on Appeal before the Federal Circuit

Goodwin on

We have previously reported on the Amgen v. Sanofi Praulent® litigation, which has been ongoing since late 2014. After the parties stipulated to infringement, a jury in the District of Delaware found in favor of Amgen and the...more

McDonnell Boehnen Hulbert & Berghoff LLP

Life Sciences Court Report - March 2020

About Life Sciences Court Report:  We will periodically report on recently filed biotech and pharma litigation. Allergan USA, Inc. v. Prollenium US Inc. 1-20-cv-00104; filed January 23, 2020 in the District Court of Delaware...more

Nelson Mullins Riley & Scarborough LLP

Federal Circuit Clarifies Construction of Claims Reciting Markush Groups

The Federal Circuit’s recent decision in Amgen Inc. v. Amneal Pharms. LLC, 945 F.3d 1368 (Fed. Cir. 2020) provides guidance on construing claims that recite Markush groups, particularly in combination with the open and closed...more

124 Results
 / 
View per page
Page: of 5

"My best business intelligence, in one easy email…"

Your first step to building a free, personalized, morning email brief covering pertinent authors and topics on JD Supra:
*By using the service, you signify your acceptance of JD Supra's Privacy Policy.
- hide
- hide