News & Analysis as of

Arbitration Temporary Restraining Order

Arbitration is a widely-used method for settling disputes between parties. During arbitration, parties submit their dispute to an impartial third person or party, usually chosen by the parties. Typically, parties... more +
Arbitration is a widely-used method for settling disputes between parties. During arbitration, parties submit their dispute to an impartial third person or party, usually chosen by the parties. Typically, parties to arbitration agree in advance to be bound by the arbitrator's decision. Arbitration is an alternative to litigation, but it shares many of the familiar features of litigation. Namely, parties to arbitration hold hearings before neutral decision-makers, present evidence and argue the merits of their position. Parties often choose arbitration due to its perceived advantages over litigation. Those perceived advantages include greater efficiency and flexibility, and lower costs. less -
Seward & Kissel LLP

Employment Litigation Roundup: November 2024

Seward & Kissel LLP on

In May 2024, two TD Bank entities (“TD Bank”) sued two former employees and their new employer Raymond James Financial Services, Inc. and one of its subsidiaries (together, “Raymond James”) in Connecticut federal court,...more

Troutman Pepper Locke

Minnesota Court Denies Substitution Motion: Implications for Litigation Funders

Troutman Pepper Locke on

A new decision may cut back on attempts by third-party litigation lenders to control settlements. Earlier this month, the U.S. District Court for the District of Minnesota refused to permit the substitution of a legal...more

UB Greensfelder LLP

Federal Judge Rules That While Zoom Arbitrations Are “Clunkier,” They Are Not Unfair

UB Greensfelder LLP on

Carlos Legaspy is a respondent in a FINRA arbitration that was scheduled to go to hearing in August. As with all other FINRA cases, it was subject to a sweeping administrative decision by FINRA to postpone all in-person...more

Seyfarth Shaw LLP

AB 51: Preliminary Injunction GRANTED

Seyfarth Shaw LLP on

Seyfarth Synopsis: Among other things, AB 51 makes it unlawful for employers to impose arbitration agreements on employees as a condition of employment, even if employees are permitted to opt out. AB 51 was quickly challenged...more

Littler

California Court Concludes that Anti-Arbitration Law is Likely Preempted

Littler on

On February 7, 2020, the U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of California issued an order supporting its injunction of Assembly Bill 51 (AB 51), an expansive anti-arbitration law enacted in October, which was...more

Vedder Price

Federal Court Preliminary Enjoins Enforcement of New California Arbitration Law AB 51

Vedder Price on

On Friday, January 31, 2020, Chief District Judge Kimberly J. Mueller of the federal District Court for the Eastern District of California issued a Preliminary Injunction (PI) against the State of California, enjoining the...more

Epstein Becker & Green

Federal Court Issues Preliminary Injunction to Stop California’s Controversial Anti-Arbitration Law

The California Legislature’s attempt to circumvent both the Federal Arbitration Act (“FAA”) and the Supreme Court’s landmark decision in Epic Systems by crafting a new law prohibiting California employers from requiring...more

Seyfarth Shaw LLP

AB 51 Challenge: Preliminary Injunction Issued

Seyfarth Shaw LLP on

Seyfarth Synopsis: After granting a temporary restraining order days before AB 51 was to go into effect, the Eastern District of California granted a motion for a preliminary injunction on January 31, 2020. An order detailing...more

Littler

Federal Court Halts Enforcement of California Arbitration Law

Littler on

A California federal court has granted a preliminary injunction blocking enforcement of Assembly Bill 51, an expansive anti-arbitration law enacted in October and set to take effect on January 1, 2020....more

Ervin Cohen & Jessup LLP

Breaking News: Federal Court Grants Preliminary Injunction To Block AB 51 Employment Arbitration Law

U.S. District Court Judge Kimberly Mueller just granted a preliminary injunction to block Assembly Bill 51 throughout future court proceedings, which will examine the enforceability of the new law.  This is welcome news for...more

Fisher Phillips

Federal Court Preserves Use Of Mandatory Arbitration Agreements In California

Fisher Phillips on

A federal judge just extended the reprieve that permitted California employers to escape the grasp of a newly enacted law that aimed to prevent them from utilizing mandatory arbitration agreements with their employees. After...more

Stokes Wagner

AB 51 Remains on Pause as the District Court Requests Further Briefing

Stokes Wagner on

The temporary restraining order (“TRO”) which prevents the enforcement of AB 51 remains in effect until January 31, 2020. As a reminder, California’s AB 51 bars mandatory arbitration agreements in employment agreements....more

BakerHostetler

Update on the TRO Issued in the Case Involving California’s AB 51 Anti-Arbitration Law

BakerHostetler on

On Jan. 10, 2020 Chief District Judge Kimberly J. Mueller further defined the scope, issues and duration of the Temporary Restraining Order (TRO) she initially issued on Dec. 30, 2019....more

Epstein Becker & Green

Federal Court Extends TRO to Enjoin Enforcement of New California Arbitration Statute

Epstein Becker & Green on

As we recently wrote here, on December 29, 2019, just days before California’s new arbitration statute known as AB 51 was to go into effect, a federal judge in the United States District Court of the Eastern District of...more

Fenwick & West LLP

TRO Blocks State of California From Enforcing New Arbitration Law

Fenwick & West LLP on

U.S. District Judge Kimberly Mueller, in Sacramento on December 30, 2019, issued a temporary restraining order (TRO) blocking the state of California from enforcing AB 51, and on January 10 extended the TRO until January 31,...more

Ervin Cohen & Jessup LLP

Update: AB 51 Employment Arbitration Law Remains On Hold

Assembly Bill 51, the controversial law that would have prevented employers from requiring employees to enter arbitration agreements, has been put on hold until at least January 31, 2020.  As reported in this blog last week,...more

Ogletree, Deakins, Nash, Smoak & Stewart,...

AB 51 Update: Court Continues TRO on California’s Arbitration Statute

Assembly Bill (AB) 51, which attempts to ban certain mandatory arbitration agreements, was scheduled to go into effect on January 1, 2020. However, a coalition of business organizations filed a suit on December 9, 2019...more

Mintz - Employment Viewpoints

California’s Ban on Mandatory Employment Arbitration Stayed for Now

California AB 51’s ban on mandatory employment arbitration remains stayed for now. AB 51 was passed in fall 2019 and essentially prohibits employers from requiring an applicant or employee to consent to mandatory arbitration...more

Orrick - Employment Law and Litigation

Try To Restrain Yourself: California Is Temporarily Restrained From Enforcing Arbitration Ban

Remember California’s new ban on mandatory workplace arbitration agreements? The Eastern District of California has put it on ice, granting a temporary restraining order against the ban’s enforcement....more

Vedder Price

TRO Halts New Arbitration Law AB51

Vedder Price on

On December 30, 2019, a federal District Court issued a Temporary Restraining Order (TRO) against the State of California temporarily enjoining the State from enforcing Assembly Bill 51 (AB 51) —the new California law...more

Seyfarth Shaw LLP

AB 51 Challenge: TRO Granted

Seyfarth Shaw LLP on

Seyfarth Synopsis: Set to take effect on January 1, 2020, AB 51 would make it unlawful for employers to impose arbitration agreements on employees as a condition of employment, even if employees are permitted to opt out. As...more

Ervin Cohen & Jessup LLP

Judge Orders Emergency Halt of AB 51 Employment Arbitration Law

A federal judge issued a temporary restraining order on Monday, December 30, to halt enforcement of California’s Assembly Bill 51 (AB 51), which was scheduled to go into effect on January 1, 2020. AB 51 would have prevented...more

Lewitt Hackman

Employers: California Assembly Bill 51 on Hold For Now

Lewitt Hackman on

We previously highlighted Assembly Bill 51, which prohibits employers from requiring employees or applicants for employment to “waive any right, forum, or procedure for a violation” of the Fair Employment and Housing Act or...more

FordHarrison

A (Temporary) Reprieve for Mandatory Workplace Arbitration

FordHarrison on

On December 30, 2019, a federal judge in the Eastern District of California entered an order temporarily halting the enforcement of AB 51, California’s new anti-mandatory arbitration law. AB 51, which was set to go into...more

Dorsey & Whitney LLP

Court Temporarily Halts California’s New Ban on Mandatory Employment Arbitration Agreements

Dorsey & Whitney LLP on

On October 10, 2019, California Governor Newsom signed a bill seeking to ban employers from requiring employees or applicants to sign arbitration agreements waiving their rights under the Labor Code or the state’s...more

30 Results
 / 
View per page
Page: of 2

"My best business intelligence, in one easy email…"

Your first step to building a free, personalized, morning email brief covering pertinent authors and topics on JD Supra:
*By using the service, you signify your acceptance of JD Supra's Privacy Policy.
- hide
- hide