News & Analysis as of

Supreme Court of the United States › Medicaid

The United States Supreme Court is the highest court of the United States and is charged with interpreting federal law, including the United States Constitution. The Court's docket is largely discretionary... more +
The United States Supreme Court is the highest court of the United States and is charged with interpreting federal law, including the United States Constitution. The Court's docket is largely discretionary with only a limited number of cases granted review each term.  The Court is comprised of one chief justice and eight associate justices, who are nominated by the President and confirmed by the Senate to hold lifetime positions. less -
Bradley Arant Boult Cummings LLP

The Overturn of Chevron: A New Design for Healthcare Law

Bradley Arant Boult Cummings LLP on

On June 28, 2024, SCOTUS overturned the long-standing Chevron doctrine in its decision Loper Bright Enterprises v. Raimondo and Relentless v. Department of Commerce. The Court’s ruling will have a significant impact on...more

ArentFox Schiff

Post-Chevron Health Care Regulations: The Dawn of a New Day

ArentFox Schiff on

On June 28, the US Supreme Court overturned the Chevron doctrine — the legal principle that the judiciary should defer to a federal agency’s reasonable interpretation of an ambiguous statute. Chevron reflected the view...more

Arnall Golden Gregory LLP

Healthcare Providers Could Finally Have Their Day in Court: Supreme Court Holds That Defendants Are Entitled to Jury Trials When...

Arnall Golden Gregory LLP on

On June 27, 2024, the Supreme Court of the United States released its opinion in SEC v. Jarkesy, a case involving a Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”) enforcement action for civil penalties against an investment...more

Foley & Lardner LLP

What Does the End of Chevron Deference Mean for Federal Health Care Programs?

Foley & Lardner LLP on

On June 28, 2024, the Supreme Court rejected the doctrine of Chevron deference in the closely watched case of Loper Bright Enterprises v. Raimondo. In a 6-3 decision, the Court held that Chevron’s rule that courts must defer...more

Lippes Mathias LLP

Supreme Court Decides in Favor of Tribal Nations in Becerra v. San Carlos Apache Tribe

Lippes Mathias LLP on

The U.S. Supreme Court’s June 6 decision is a victory for Tribal Nations, affording them new opportunities to recover contract support costs pertaining to healthcare programs. In Becerra v. San Carlos Apache Tribe, the...more

Baker Donelson

What the Supreme Court's "Chevron Deference" Ruling Could Mean for Health Care Law

Baker Donelson on

Baker Donelson recently published Anticipating SCOTUS Ruling on Chevron Deference – What to Know and Five Ways to Prepare explaining the United States Supreme Court's upcoming ruling which is expected to impact the regulatory...more

Proskauer - Health Care Law Brief

New HIPAA Requirements Place Additional Privacy Obligations on Covered Entities and Patients in an Effort to Protect Reproductive...

Proskauer - Health Care Law Brief on

On April 22, 2024, the Office for Civil Rights (OCR) for the United States Department of Health and Human Services issued a Final Rule amending the Privacy Rule of the Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act...more

Dorsey & Whitney LLP

Tribes Win Healthcare Contract Support Costs at Supreme Court

Dorsey & Whitney LLP on

On June 6, 2024, the Supreme Court issued its decision in the consolidated cases of Becerra v. San Carlos Apache Tribe (No. 23-250) and Becerra v. Northern Arapaho Tribe (No. 23-253)....more

Snell & Wilmer

Supreme Court Ruling Supports Tribal Healthcare Funding and Self-Determination

Snell & Wilmer on

By Heidi McNeil Staudenmaier and Kelsey Haake  In a momentous decision on June 6, 2024, the U.S. Supreme Court delivered a resounding victory for Native American tribes. The Court ruled that the Indian Health Service (IHS)...more

WilmerHale

In Narrow Victory for Tribal Nations, US Supreme Court Requires Federal Government to Reimburse Tribal Nations for Healthcare...

WilmerHale on

On June 6, 2024, the US Supreme Court decided Becerra v. San Carlos Apache Tribe and Becerra v. Northern Arapaho Tribe (Nos. 23-250 and 23-253), holding that the Indian Health Service (IHS) must reimburse Native nations,...more

Dorsey & Whitney LLP

The Supreme Court Update - June 6, 2024

Dorsey & Whitney LLP on

The Supreme Court of the United States issued three decisions today: Becerra v. San Carlos Apache Tribe, No. 23-250: This case concerns the funding the Indian Health Service (“IHS”) must provide to Indian tribes that...more

Holland & Knight LLP

Tribes: Act Now to Take Advantage of Supreme Court's Decision on Contract Support Costs

Holland & Knight LLP on

The U.S. Supreme Court ruled on June 6, 2024, that the Indian Health Service (IHS) must pay contract support costs with respect to program income – payments from Medicare, Medicaid and private insurers – received by tribes...more

King & Spalding

CMS Issues Ruling 1498-R3 Revoking 1498-R2 Regarding Disproportionate Share Medicare/SSI Fractions

King & Spalding on

On March 4, 2024, CMS issued Ruling 1498-R3 which revokes CMS Ruling 1498-R2. CMS Ruling 1498-R2 gave providers the option of using either “total” days or “covered” days in calculating their disproportionate share (DSH)...more

PilieroMazza PLLC

Settlements and Judgments from FCA and Fraud Matters Top $2.68 Billion in 2023

PilieroMazza PLLC on

On February 22, 2024, the Department of Justice (DOJ) released its annual statistical report (Annual Report) regarding settlements and judgments obtained in the False Claims Act (FCA) and fraud matters for Fiscal Year (FY)...more

Paul Hastings LLP

SuperValu and Executive Health Resources: What to Know About the FCA Following the 2023 Term

Paul Hastings LLP on

As we take stock of the Supreme Court’s 2023 term, two landmark decisions shift our understanding of scienter and government intervention as it relates to the False Claims Act (“FCA”), 31 U.S.C. § 3729. First, on June 1,...more

Epstein Becker & Green

SuperValu’s Effect on the FCA Scienter Standard and Impact to Future Litigation

Epstein Becker & Green on

n June 1, 2023, the U.S. Supreme Court unanimously settled a long-standing dispute over a subjective versus objective standard for scienter under the False Claims Act (FCA), holding that a defendant’s own subjective belief is...more

Dickinson Wright

False Claims Act “Knowledge” Is a Subjective Standard

Dickinson Wright on

The Federal False Claims Act (“FCA”) allows private parties to bring lawsuits in the name of the federal government against defendants who allegedly “knowingly” present a false claim to the government for payment. The...more

ArentFox Schiff

Investigations Newsletter: New FCA Filings Point to Future Path Forward For Companies

ArentFox Schiff on

New FCA Filings Point to Future Path Forward For Companies - The US Supreme Court recently ruled in United States ex rel. Proctor v. Safeway Inc. and United States ex rel. Schutte, et al. v. SuperValu Inc. et al. that...more

Stevens & Lee

Supreme Court’s Decision in SuperValu May Benefit Defendants in False Claims Act Cases

Stevens & Lee on

Last month in United States ex rel. Schutte, et al. v. SuperValu Inc. et al, the Supreme Court unanimously held (with Justice Thomas writing the opinion) that the False Claims Act’s (“FCA”) scienter element refers to a...more

BCLP

U.S. Supreme Court Explains Meaning of “knowingly” Under the False Claims Act

BCLP on

In its recent unanimous and significant decision in the consolidated cases of United States ex rel. Schutte v. SuperValu, No. 21-1326 (6-1-23), and United States ex rel. Proctol v. Safeway, Inc., No. 22-111 (6-1-23), the...more

King & Spalding

Supreme Court Vacates and Remands Medicaid Disputes to 4th, 7th Circuits

King & Spalding on

On June 20, 2023, the Supreme Court vacated and remanded two circuit court decisions finding private rights of action for violations of rights purportedly created by federal Medicaid law for further consideration in light of...more

Holland & Knight LLP

Supreme Court Narrows Scope of Aggravated Identity Theft Law in Healthcare Fraud Case

Holland & Knight LLP on

The healthcare industry is one of the most heavily regulated industries in the United States. Healthcare companies and practitioners devote significant resources to complying with the complex and often changing legal and...more

Clark Hill PLC

Healthcare Organizations and Practitioners Receive New Protection Against Frivolous Whistleblower Lawsuits

Clark Hill PLC on

Last Friday, the U.S. Supreme Court (SCOTUS) handed down an important ruling that will give healthcare organizations and practitioners relief against meritless whistleblower lawsuits. The ruling could result in saving...more

Jackson Lewis P.C.

U.S. Supreme Court: False Claims Act Liability Depends on Defendant’s Subjective Beliefs

Jackson Lewis P.C. on

Liability in False Claims Act (FCA) suits depends on whether a defendant subjectively believed its claims were false, not on whether it can offer an objectively reasonable basis for its claims, the U.S. Supreme Court has held...more

Zuckerman Spaeder LLP

In a win for defendants, the Supreme Court limits the aggravated identity theft statute and resulting prosecutorial...

Zuckerman Spaeder LLP on

Federal prosecutors will now be cabined in their ability to use aggravated identity theft charges to pressure defendants to plead guilty to other offenses in exchange for avoiding the two-year mandatory minimum, mandatory...more

241 Results
 / 
View per page
Page: of 10
Next »

"My best business intelligence, in one easy email…"

Your first step to building a free, personalized, morning email brief covering pertinent authors and topics on JD Supra:
Sign up Log in
*By using the service, you signify your acceptance of JD Supra's Privacy Policy.
- hide
- hide