News & Analysis as of

Spending Clause

Fisher Phillips

Federal Court Halts Enforcement of DEI Executive Orders: What Employers Need to Know + 5 Steps to Take Next

Fisher Phillips on

President Trump issued two anti-DEI executive orders at the start of his second term that shook up the workplace and left federal contractors and private employers wondering how to comply. Employers grappled with...more

DCI Consulting

Preliminary Injunction Granted Against Anti-DEI Executive Orders

DCI Consulting on

In a significant legal move, Democracy Forward, on behalf of the National Association of Diversity Officers in Higher Education (NADOHE), the American Association of University Professors (AAUP), Restaurant Opportunities...more

Poyner Spruill LLP

Federal Court Rules 2024 Title IX Regulations Unconstitutional

Poyner Spruill LLP on

In its decision vacating the United States Department of Education’s 2024 Title IX Regulations on January 9, 2025, the U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Kentucky found that the Department of Education exceeded...more

Bricker Graydon LLP

2024 Title IX Regulations Vacated by Federal Court

Bricker Graydon LLP on

On January 9, 2025, the U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Kentucky issued a ruling in which it vacated the 2024 Title IX regulations that went into effect in many states on August 1, 2024....more

Bond Schoeneck & King PLLC

Title IX 2024 Final Rule Struck Down

On Jan. 9, 2025, the Eastern District of Kentucky held in State of Tennessee, et al. v. Miguel Cardona, et al. that the U.S. Department of Education’s 2024 Final Rule implementing Title IX is “unlawful.” This court decision...more

Fisher Phillips

Federal Court Blocks Sweeping Title IX Rule for Schools Nationwide: How Your School Can Approach the Changes

Fisher Phillips on

A federal court just blocked the sweeping Title IX rule finalized by the Biden administration last year – effectively wiping the entire rule off the books for all schools nationwide. Prior to Thursday’s ruling, schools across...more

Shipman & Goodwin LLP

2024 Title IX Regulations Are Likely Vacated

Shipman & Goodwin LLP on

Last year was a turbulent one for Title IX, and although we are just a few days into 2025, this turbulence has persisted into the new year. Yesterday, January 9, 2025, a federal district court in Kentucky issued a ruling that...more

Ogletree, Deakins, Nash, Smoak & Stewart,...

U.S. Department of Education’s 2024 Title IX Final Rule Addressing Sex-Based Discrimination and Sexual Harassment Vacated

On January 9, 2025, in State of Tennessee v. Cardona, Civil Action No. 2:24-cv-072-DCR, the U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Kentucky vacated the Title IX Final Rule that was issued by the U.S. Department of...more

Husch Blackwell LLP

Title IX Litigation Tracker: Tensions Rise as Litigation Remains Active Between States and the Federal Government Over Title IX...

Husch Blackwell LLP on

On April 19, 2024, the U.S. Department of Education (“Department”) released the long-awaited Final Rule to Title IX. Title IX of the Education Amendments of 1972 is a statute with corresponding regulations that protect people...more

Adams & Reese

2024 Title IX Final Rule Enjoined in Louisiana, Mississippi, Montana, and Idaho

Adams & Reese on

Last Thursday, a United States District Court in Louisiana enjoined implementation of the amended Title IX regulations (2024 Final Rule), the first decision in one of several cases challenging the 2024 Final Rule. The new...more

King & Spalding

Key Recent Developments In Environmental Justice Litigation

King & Spalding on

Louisiana remains at the forefront of environmental justice activity. In just four days from January 19 to January 23, 2024, two courts in Louisiana offered interpretations to environmental justice efforts in the State of...more

Latham & Watkins LLP

US EPA’s Environmental Justice Objectives on Trial

Latham & Watkins LLP on

As the objectives gain traction, they are meeting state resistance in court. The US Environmental Protection Agency’s (EPA’s) strategic plan for 2022–26, released in March 2022, added a new foundational principle to the...more

K&L Gates LLP

7 to 2 - The US Supreme Court Confirms That Federal Nursing Home Reform Act Creates Patient Enforceable Rights

K&L Gates LLP on

On 8 June 2023, in Health and Hospital Corporation of Marion County v. Talevski, the United States Supreme Court ruled that the rights set out in the Federal Nursing Home Reform Act (FNHRA) can be enforced under 42 U.S.C. §...more

Foley Hoag LLP - Medicaid and the Law

The Supreme Court’s Talevski Decision: Medicaid Private Enforcement under Section 1983 Lives to See Another Day

Today’s post provides an important update on the Supreme Court case Health & Hospital Corporation of Marion County (HHC) v. Talevski. As readers will remember, our blog has been following this case since it made its way to...more

Faegre Drinker Biddle & Reath LLP

Supreme Court Decides Health & Hospital Corp. of Marion Cty. v. Talevski

On June 8, 2023, the U.S. Supreme Court decided Health & Hospital Corp. of Marion Cty. v. Talevski, No. 21-806, holding that certain rights contained in the Federal Nursing Home Reform Act (FNHRA) can be enforced through a...more

Tucker Arensberg, P.C.

Emotional Distress Monetary Damages Section 504 Claims Allowed by Supreme Court

Tucker Arensberg, P.C. on

​​​​​​​In Cummings v. Premier Rehab Keller, P.L.L.C., 142 S. Ct. 1562 (April 28, 2022) (U.S. Supreme Court) concludes that damages for emotional distress are not recoverable under the Rehabilitation Act of 1973 and the...more

Law School Toolbox

Law School Toolbox Podcast Episode 362: Listen and Learn -- The Taxing and Spending Clause (Con Law)

Law School Toolbox on

Welcome back to the Law School Toolbox podcast! In today's episode from our "Listen and Learn" series, we're discussing the Taxing and Spending Clause of the Constitution, which specifies how Congress can collect taxes and...more

ArentFox Schiff

Key Supreme Court Cases to Watch in Administrative and Environmental Law

ArentFox Schiff on

The first Monday of October means the Supreme Court begins to hear cases for the new term. As we promised at the end of last term, below we summarize cases the Court could address, including issues involving the federal Clean...more

Weber Gallagher Simpson Stapleton Fires &...

U.S. Supreme Court Holds That Emotional Distress Damages are not Recoverable Under the Rehab Act and ACA

On April 28, 2022, the Supreme Court of the United States ruled 6-3 that emotional distress damages are not recoverable in a private action to enforce the Rehabilitation Act or the Affordable Care Act (ACA)....more

McAfee & Taft

SCOTUS: Emotional distress damages not recoverable under certain anti-discrimination statutes

McAfee & Taft on

Congress has passed many laws that prohibit discrimination in many ways. Four of those statutes were passed pursuant to Congress’s authority under the Spending Clause in the U.S. Constitution....more

Law School Toolbox

Bar Exam Toolbox Podcast Episode 183: Listen and Learn -- Taxing and Spending Clause (Con Law)

Law School Toolbox on

Welcome back to the Bar Exam Toolbox podcast! In today's episode from our "Listen and Learn" series, we're discussing the Taxing and Spending Clause of the Constitution, which specifies how Congress can collect taxes and...more

Rumberger | Kirk

Recent U.S. Supreme Court Decision Alters the Scope of Recoverable Damages Under Anti-Discrimination Statutes Enacted under the...

Rumberger | Kirk on

The Supreme Court of the United States recently held in Cummings v. Premier Rehab Keller, P.L.L.C., 142 S. Ct. 1562 (2022), that damages for emotional distress are not recoverable in actions seeking to enforce the...more

Saul Ewing LLP

The U.S. Supreme Court Holds That Emotional Damages Are Not Available Under Spending Clause Statutes, Including Title IX and Title...

Saul Ewing LLP on

On April 28, 2022, the U.S. Supreme Court held in Cummings v Premier Rehab Keller, P.L.L.C. that emotional distress damages are not recoverable in a private action to enforce several civil rights statutes. While Cummings...more

Ogletree, Deakins, Nash, Smoak & Stewart,...

U.S. High Court Says No Emotional Distress Damages For Discrimination under Rehab Act and ACA

The Supreme Court of the United States, on April 28, 2022, held that emotional distress damages are not available for private discrimination claims under the federal Rehabilitation Act of 1973 and the Affordable Care Act...more

FordHarrison

U.S. Supreme Court Holds that Spending Clause Antidiscrimination Statutes do not Permit Recovery of Damages for Emotional Distress

FordHarrison on

Executive Summary: In a groundbreaking opinion authored by Chief Justice Roberts in Cummings v. Premier Rehab Keller, P.L.L.C., the United States Supreme Court held that damages for emotional distress are not recoverable in a...more

39 Results
 / 
View per page
Page: of 2

"My best business intelligence, in one easy email…"

Your first step to building a free, personalized, morning email brief covering pertinent authors and topics on JD Supra:
*By using the service, you signify your acceptance of JD Supra's Privacy Policy.
- hide
- hide