Latest Publications

Share:

BYOOVIZ is confusing with BEOVU: Federal Court finds violation of Novartis’ trademark rights

In a decision dated January 24, 2024, Justice Pallotta allowed Novartis’ application, finding that Biogen and Samsung’s use of the trademark BYOOVIZ in association with an ophthalmologic drug violates Novartis’ rights in its...more

Canadian Trademark Law 2021: A Year in Review

2021 offered many lessons to Canadian trademark owners including: reminders of the challenges of enforcing inherently weak trademarks and the importance and benefits of registering IP rights at the Canadian border. As well,...more

Supreme Court of Canada denies leave to appeal in Travelway Group International Inc v Group III International Ltd

SCC decision highlights the importance of obtaining a trademark registration to guard against claims of infringement and passing off - The Supreme Court of Canada has now put an end to a dispute between Wenger SA, Group...more

Top 10 differences between Canadian and U.S. trademark filing, prosecution and enforcement

Canada has established itself as an attractive jurisdiction in which to do business. It has a stable economy, a high-income population, a business-friendly environment and has long led the G7 in growth. It also has especially...more

Effectively using experts in IP Litigation – Part 2: Practise

In intellectual property litigation, the outcome of many high stakes cases has turned on expert testimony. It is therefore important for a litigator to spend time and effort to properly identify, select, and prepare the...more

Why you should designate Canada – and a Canadian agent – in your next Madrid application

A little over a year has passed since Canada overhauled its trademark legislation and acceded to the Madrid Protocol, making it easier than ever to protect trademark rights in Canada. In this IP Update, we explore some of...more

Effectively using experts in IP Litigation – Part 1: Theory

In IP litigation, expert testimony is common and important. Experts may provide the court with a scientific primer in highly complex cases. In patent litigation, experts may construe complex claims through the eyes of a...more

PC v. PC. Pampered Chef Succeeds in Trademark Infringement Battle

On July 22, 2019, the Federal Court issued its decision in Loblaws Inc v Columbia Insurance Company, 2019 FC 961. Pampered Chef, a Berkshire Hathaway company and a world-leader in the sale of premium kitchenware products, has...more

Rx IP Update - April 2019

PMPRB amendments expected to come into force no earlier than Spring 2020 - On April 1, 2019, Health Canada released Forward Regulatory Plan 2019-2021: Regulations Amending the Patented Medicines Regulations. This brief...more

Health Canada and CADTH launch new initiative to provide early parallel scientific advice

On February 28, 2019, Health Canada released a Notice to Industry announcing the Early Parallel Scientific Advice initiative. Currently, Health Canada and the Canadian Agency for Drugs and Technologies in Health (CADTH) offer...more

Rx IP Update - January 2019

IN THIS ISSUE: -Abbott/Takeda permitted to plead that a third party’s patent would be infringed by alleged non-infringing alternative - PMPRB News: **PMPRB issues a Notice of Hearing for allegations of excessive...more

Rx IP Update - December 2018

FCA overturns cefaclor damages decision on prejudgment interest issue, provides guidance on NIA defence - On November 23, 2018, the Federal Court of Appeal (FCA) allowed in part Apotex’s appeal of a decision awarding Eli...more

Rx IP Update - November 2018

In This Issue: Ontario Court of Appeal allows Sanofi and Schering to plead that Federal Court ramipril patent invalidity decision was flawed due to “promise doctrine” - In an action by Apotex for compensation from...more

Rx IP Update - October 2018

Apotex not permitted to plead promise-based invalidity grounds in Ontario section 8 lansoprazole action - This motion arose in the context of a section 8 action in which Apotex claims damages for delay in the issuance of...more

Apotex not permitted to plead promise-based invalidity grounds in Ontario section 8 lansoprazole action

This motion arose in the context of a section 8 action in which Apotex claims damages for delay in the issuance of its notice of compliance for its generic lansoprazole product (Takeda's PREVACID), due to prohibition...more

Rx IP Update - September 2018

Certificate of Supplementary Protection Regime: First Anniversary Update - September 21, 2018 marked the first anniversary of the certificate of supplementary protection (CSP) regime. CSPs, which provide an additional...more

17 Results
 / 
View per page
Page: of 1

"My best business intelligence, in one easy email…"

Your first step to building a free, personalized, morning email brief covering pertinent authors and topics on JD Supra:
*By using the service, you signify your acceptance of JD Supra's Privacy Policy.
- hide
- hide