Gareth Osborne and John Riley on How to Build Seamless Client Experiences - Episode 10 Passle's CMO Series Digital Masterclass:
Podcast Episode 174: Timeline of an Accomplished Law Firm Senior Marketer: From Coordinator to CMO (1989-today)
LISI's All the Things Podcast | One More Thing with Matt Parfitt, President @ Cirrom
Paula Zirinsky of Structura Strategy Group on clients, romance, and where law firms can up their engagement game - Passle's CMO Series Podcast
Angela Quinn of Husch Blackwell on aligning your firm around the client experience - Passle CMO Series Podcast
What Lawyers Need to Know About Cybersecurity | Dennis Van Metre | Texas Appellate Law Podcast
Internal Investigations in the Asia-Pacific Region
[LEGAL MARKETING MOMENTS] What Do You Need To Know About The Term Metaverse?
Law Firm ILN-telligence Podcast | Episode 21: Carl Grassi, McDonald Hopkins LLC | United States
Law Firm ILN-telligence Podcast | Episode 20: Andreas Kaeser, wehinger kaelin ferrari ag | Switzerland
Sitting with the C-Suite: How to Determine Where to Put Your Business's Capital Investments
Law Firm ILN-telligence Podcast | Episode 12: Marie Macdonald | Miller Samuel Hill Brown | Glasgow, Scotland
Law Firm ILN-telligence Podcast | Episode 11: Bruce Feuchter | Stradling Yocca Carlson & Rauth | California, US
Client Confidentiality in the Age of Coronavirus [More with McGlinchey Ep. 2]
[EP. 45] Are Lawyers Creating Coronavirus Content The Wrong Way?
Law Firm ILN-telligence Podcast | Episode 4: Attilio Ferrari | FPB Legal, Milan, Italy
Digital Issues for Individuals Working at Home (Digital Planning Podcast)
[EP. 44] Should Lawyers Be Selling Services During This Coronavirus COVID-19 Crisis?
Law Firm ILN-telligence Podcast | Episode 1: Pal Jalsovszky, Jalsovszky Law Firm | Budapest, Hungary
The ABA recently provided insight for attorneys who represent corporate clients. While that engagement is often limited to an attorney’s duty to the organization, there is a very real risk that the organization’s members –...more
Outside and in-house lawyers may of course normally claim privilege protection for their investigation-related communications, as long as they were primarily motivated by the need for legal advice. Depending on the...more
Many things go without saying. But the fact that attorneys wear many hats—especially those working as in-house counsel—shouldn’t be one of them. These professionals must not only appear Janus-like in their ability to...more
In 2013, then Chancellor Leo Strine determined that under Section 259 of the Delaware General Corporation Law the attorney-client privilege held by the target company follows to the surviving company after a merger. Great...more
Attorney-client privilege protection depends on a communication’s content — which must be primarily motivated by the client’s request for legal advice....more
With its origins in the 16th century, the attorney-client privilege is one of the oldest doctrines in our common law tradition. Even so, new issues do arise, like in the North Carolina Business Court case Hosie v. 8 Rivers...more
Lawyers representing corporations all recognize the privilege waiver risk of disclosure to outsiders. But there are two huge risks to privilege protection even for internal corporate communications. Pointing to the “primary...more
There is no doubt that high-stakes litigation is a team sport. Among myriad experts that come to the table for the client, litigation communications professionals are becoming more essential than ever. To help manage the...more
Defendants seeking to avoid liability by relying on a lawyer’s advice trigger a classic “implied waiver.” Although asserting that defense does not itself disclose any privileged communications (as with an intentional or...more
The US concepts of the attorney-client privilege and the work-product doctrine are rooted in England’s and Wales’s legal advice and litigation privileges. The primary purpose of the attorney-client privilege and the legal...more
Join our panel of distinguished attorneys from across the globe to explore how attorney-client privileged communications and work product protections are defined and applied across jurisdictions. Panelists from the United...more
Some lawyers erroneously assume that the fragile attorney-client privilege protection normally survives disclosure (by them or by their clients) to the client’s consultant/agent. That can be true in very limited...more
Consider the scenario in which opposing counsel provided a settlement offer that the client approved, but the lawyer has not communicated its acceptance to opposing counsel prior to the client’s death. A zealous advocate may...more
On January 9, 2023, the Supreme Court held oral arguments on a significant issue regarding the application of the attorney-client privilege in a case called In re Grand Jury, Docket No. 21-1397, 598 U.S. ___ (2023). In re...more
A recent U.S. Supreme Court case, In re Grand Jury, captured the attention of lawyers nationwide who hoped it would provide guidance on the application of attorney-client privilege to “mixed-purpose” communications between...more
It’s hard to keep up with all the recent changes to labor and employment law. While the law always seems to evolve at a rapid pace, there have been an unprecedented number of changes for the past few years — and this past...more
On January 23, 2023, the United States Supreme Court dismissed the writ of certiorari as improvidently granted in a case that asked the Court to consider how to determine the application of attorney-client privilege to...more
The Supreme Court was seemingly set to decide whether and when a party can assert attorney-client privilege protection over communications containing both legal and non-legal advice, but SCOTUS recently decided to bypass the...more
The “attorney-client privilege” may be the most well-known and misunderstood legal principles. Both attorneys and clients often make broad assumptions about its scope and application. When these assumptions turn out to be...more
On January 23, 2023, the U.S. Supreme Court dismissed In re Grand Jury, which had asked it to expand the scope of attorney-client privilege protection for dual-purpose communications, i.e., communications (particularly those...more
On January 9, 2023, the United States Supreme Court heard oral argument in In re Grand Jury, No. 21-1397, a case with potentially far-reaching implications concerning the application of the attorney-client privilege to...more
The Supreme Court just heard arguments in a case that could transform the way in-house and outside attorneys communicate with their clients every single day. The issue before SCOTUS in the case of In re Grand Jury is whether...more
The attorney-client privilege protects confidential communications between clients and their attorneys made for the purpose of obtaining or providing legal advice. In Upjohn Co. v. United States, a seminal 1981 decision...more
It is well-established that attorneys and their clients are entitled to private and protected communications. But what level of protections are available when an accountant is used in an engagement to provide an area of...more
We wrote last July about a draft California ethics opinion regarding clients who may have diminished mental capacity. After receiving public comment, the State Bar’s Standing Committee on Professional Responsibility and...more