Latest Posts › Wage and Hour

Share:

Los Angeles Fires: Employers Should Weigh Employee Needs With Current Laws

The recent wildfires in Los Angeles have significantly impacted businesses and their employees – employers should be aware of their responsibilities to support their workforce during this challenging time. ...more

Beyond the Contract: Non-Signatories to an Arbitration Agreement Can Compel Arbitration

Departing from the ruling in Soltero v. Precise Distribution earlier this year, the California Court of Appeal in the Second District in Gonzalez v. Nowhere Beverly Hills LLC, created a split of authority regarding an alleged...more

Cadena v. Customer Connexx: Time Spent Clocking-In Is Compensable

The Ninth Circuit Court of Appeal held that time spent logging in to start employees’ shifts should be compensable....more

Camp v. Home Depot-Employer Rounding Policies Under Scrutiny

The Sixth District California Court of Appeal held that despite evidence of neutrality of a rounding policy, the employer did not meet its burden of proof to show employees were properly compensated for all hours worked....more

No break from penalties – CA Supreme Court holds unpaid premiums give rise to waiting time penalties

The California Supreme Court published its decision in Gustavo Naranjo et al., v. Spectrum Security Services holding that employers who fail to pay for meal or rest break premiums, may also be responsible for waiting time and...more

Traveling California with PAGA

If you are an employer in California, you are probably familiar with the various employment peculiarities in the state, such as the five-hour meal rule, four-hour (or major fraction) rest rule, piece rate rules, wage...more

California Employers, a Well-Rounded Time-Keeping Policy is No Longer Good Policy

Once in a while, the California Supreme Court makes a ruling which declares unlawful an employment practice previously perceived as lawful. Today, the California Supreme Court in Donohue v. AMN Services, LLC held that...more

Good News for Employers: No Attorney Fees to Prevailing Plaintiffs on Non-Wage Claims

The threat of statutory attorney fees to a prevailing plaintiff in a wage and hour lawsuit is often leveraged to force settlements from employer defendants. In a welcomed ruling for employers, a California Court of Appeal...more

COVID-19: California Employer Frequently Asked Questions Updated

1. Can I ask employees to leave the workplace and stay home if I suspect they have COVID-19? If an employee is exhibiting symptoms related to COVID-19 (i.e., cough, shortness of breath, fever) you may ask the employee to...more

Good News for California Employers Following a Difficult 2019 Legislative Session

On January 1, 2020, California businesses faced several new laws that may significantly impact business operations, including AB 5 (codifying the “ABC” test) and AB 51 (restricting the use of mandatory arbitration). On the...more

“No More Arbitration for You!” – Part 2

In our previous blog we wrote about California’s Assembly Bill 51, which largely impacts arbitration agreements by prohibiting employers from requiring employees or applicants for employment to agree to arbitrate claims for...more

Franchisors are “Lovin’ It”

In a win for franchisors, the Ninth Circuit recently affirmed the district court’s summary judgment in favor of fast-food behemoth McDonald’s Corp., ruling that the franchisor is not a joint employer of its franchisees’...more

Good News for Employers: No Derivative Penalties for Meal or Rest Break Violations

Any employer that has faced a wage & hour lawsuit in California knows that minor violations can quickly add up to significant liabilities....more

Goodbye 1099; Hello Employer Uncertainty

Last year (April 2018) the California Supreme Court rocked the boat with the seminal Dynamex decision, which created very high barriers for companies who utilize independent contractors. On September 18, 2019, Governor Gavin...more

Employment Defense: Closing the Pay Gap One Government Regulation at a Time

The discourse around equal pay has reverberated through the media and made its way to a new federal regulation that seeks to identify and address instances in which persons of different sex, race, and ethnicity earn different...more

Employment Defense: Workforce Classification

The analysis of whether a worker is an employee or independent contractor for purposes of California’s Wage Orders became more restrictive in 2018 following the California Supreme Court’s adoption of the “ABC” test in the...more

California Employer Compliance: New Laws Affect Nearly Every Business

The 2017-2018 legislative session concluded last month with new laws effecting almost all employers in California. Here’s a summary of the new laws, as well as the bills that would have had a significant impact, but were...more

Court Of Appeal Limits Applicability Of The ABC Test

In Dynamex, the California Supreme Court decided to adopt an “ABC” test to determine whether workers are properly classified as independent contractors. This raised a number of questions concerning how (or if) the test should...more

Independent Contractor vs. Employee: Our Supreme Court Speaks Again

On April 30, 2018, the California Supreme Court handed down a ruling that may significantly impact the decision on classifying workers as “employees” or “independent contractors.” ...more

21 Results
 / 
View per page
Page: of 1

"My best business intelligence, in one easy email…"

Your first step to building a free, personalized, morning email brief covering pertinent authors and topics on JD Supra:
*By using the service, you signify your acceptance of JD Supra's Privacy Policy.
- hide
- hide