Advertising Law - December 14, 2011


In This Issue:

Court Refuses to Certify Class in Zip Code Suit; Facebook, Zynga Score Court Victory; TCPA is “Weird,” Says Supreme Court Justice; FDA to Appeal Injunction of Cigarette Labeling Rules; and In San Francisco, It Costs 10 Cents More to be “Happy”.

Excerpt from Court Refuses to Certify Class in Zip Code Suit

A U.S. District Court judge in California denied class certification in a suit alleging that salespeople at General Nutrition Corp. asked for customers’ zip codes when they conducted credit card transactions.

The suit was one of hundreds filed in the wake of Pineda v. Williams- Sonoma, where the California Supreme Court ruled that zip codes are “personal identification information” under the state’s Song-Beverly Credit Card Act. Requesting and recording the zip codes of customers can therefore result in a statutory fine of $250 for the first violation and $1,000 for each subsequent violation, the court in the Pineda case held.

Please see full article below for more information.

LOADING PDF: If there are any problems, click here to download the file.

DISCLAIMER: Because of the generality of this update, the information provided herein may not be applicable in all situations and should not be acted upon without specific legal advice based on particular situations.

© Manatt, Phelps & Phillips, LLP | Attorney Advertising

Written by:


Manatt, Phelps & Phillips, LLP on:

Reporters on Deadline

"My best business intelligence, in one easy email…"

Your first step to building a free, personalized, morning email brief covering pertinent authors and topics on JD Supra:

Sign up to create your digest using LinkedIn*

*With LinkedIn, you don't need to create a separate login to manage your free JD Supra account, and we can make suggestions based on your needs and interests. We will not post anything on LinkedIn in your name. Or, sign up using your email address.